193 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 30028930)
1. Gingival displacement using diode laser or retraction cords: A comparative clinical study.
Melilli D; Mauceri R; Albanese A; Matranga D; Pizzo G
Am J Dent; 2018 Jun; 31(3):131-134. PubMed ID: 30028930
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
2. Preimpression troughing with the diode laser: A preliminary study.
Stuffken M; Vahidi F
J Prosthet Dent; 2016 Apr; 115(4):441-6. PubMed ID: 26723098
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
3. [Access to the intracrevicular space in preparations for fixed prosthesis].
Porzier J; Benner-Jordan L; Bourdeau B; Losfeld R
Cah Prothese; 1991 Mar; (73):6-20. PubMed ID: 2013007
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
4. Comparative evaluation of the effect of impregnated retraction cord versus laser on gingival attachment level and pain perception following retraction for subgingival margins - A prospective, split-mouth, controlled, clinical study.
Diwan V; Chauhan MR; Tembhurne J; Gangurde A; Wani H; Danane S
J Indian Prosthodont Soc; 2024 Apr; 24(2):136-143. PubMed ID: 38650338
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
5. Effect of different retraction and impression techniques on the marginal fit of crowns.
Wöstmann B; Rehmann P; Trost D; Balkenhol M
J Dent; 2008 Jul; 36(7):508-12. PubMed ID: 18479801
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
6. Clinical evaluation of different gingival retraction cords.
Kumbuloglu O; User A; Toksavul S; Boyacioglu H
Quintessence Int; 2007 Feb; 38(2):e92-8. PubMed ID: 17510720
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
7. Evaluation of efficacy of different gingival displacement materials on gingival sulcus width.
Prasanna GS; Reddy K; Kumar RK; Shivaprakash S
J Contemp Dent Pract; 2013 Mar; 14(2):217-21. PubMed ID: 23811648
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
8. A multicenter randomized, controlled clinical trial comparing the use of displacement cords, an aluminum chloride paste, and a combination of paste and cords for tissue displacement.
Einarsdottir ER; Lang NP; Aspelund T; Pjetursson BE
J Prosthet Dent; 2018 Jan; 119(1):82-88. PubMed ID: 28478985
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
9. [Three-dimensional model analysis of the gingival sulcus width from different retraction time].
Zhang Jj; Liu Yh; Lv Pj; Zhao Yj
Beijing Da Xue Xue Bao Yi Xue Ban; 2011 Feb; 43(1):73-6. PubMed ID: 21321624
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
10. The use of retraction paste to simplify impression and cementation of ceramic veneers and crowns: 3-year follow-up report.
Andreiuolo RF; Abreu JLB; Hirata R
Quintessence Int; 2019; 50(8):604-610. PubMed ID: 31286117
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
11. A Clinical Study of 50 Partially Edentulous Patients with Fixed Partial Denture Restorations to Compare Clinical Parameters and Changes in Gingival Sulcus Width After Displacement with 2 Different Gingival Retraction Cord Materials (Cotton and Polymer).
Kumar L; Mattoo KA; Jain S; Khalid I; Kota MZ; Baig FAH; Ibrahim M; Javali MA; Khader MA; Kanji MA
Med Sci Monit; 2023 Apr; 29():e940098. PubMed ID: 37183802
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
12. Effects of pre-soaked retraction cords on the microcirculation of the human gingival margin.
Fazekas A; Csempesz F; Csabai Z; Vág J
Oper Dent; 2002; 27(4):343-8. PubMed ID: 12120770
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
13. Clinical trial of gingival retraction cords.
Jokstad A
J Prosthet Dent; 1999 Mar; 81(3):258-61. PubMed ID: 10050111
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
14. A clinical comparison of cordless and conventional displacement systems regarding clinical performance and impression quality.
Acar Ö; Erkut S; Özçelik TB; Ozdemır E; Akçil M
J Prosthet Dent; 2014 May; 111(5):388-94. PubMed ID: 24360008
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
15. Clinical Assessment of Gingival Sulcus Width using Various Gingival Displacement Materials.
Goutham GB; Jayanti I; Jalaluddin M; Avijeeta A; Ramanna PK; Joy J
J Contemp Dent Pract; 2018 May; 19(5):502-506. PubMed ID: 29807958
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
16. Gingival Retraction Methods for Fabrication of Fixed Partial Denture: Literature Review.
S S; Ma VS; Mi VS; F HG; M H
J Dent Biomater; 2016 Jun; 3(2):205-213. PubMed ID: 28959744
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
17. Using the double-cord packing technique of tissue retraction for making crown impressions.
Cloyd S; Puri S
Dent Today; 1999 Jan; 18(1):54-9. PubMed ID: 10765795
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
18. Cytotoxic effects of gingival retraction cords on human gingival fibroblasts in vitro.
Liu CM; Huang FM; Yang LC; Chou LS; Chou MY; Chang YC
J Oral Rehabil; 2004 Apr; 31(4):368-72. PubMed ID: 15089944
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
19. Efficacy of Different Gingival Displacement Materials in the Management of Gingival Sulcus Width: A Comparative Study.
Rathod A; Jacob SS; MAlqahtani A; Valsan I; Majeed R; Premnath A
J Contemp Dent Pract; 2021 Jun; 22(6):703-706. PubMed ID: 34393130
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
20. To cord or not to cord? That is still a question.
Veitz-Keenan A; Keenan JR
Evid Based Dent; 2017 Mar; 18(1):21-22. PubMed ID: 28338036
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
[Next] [New Search]
