These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

193 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 30028930)

  • 21. Comparative evaluation of three gingival displacement systems: an in-vivo study.
    Aldhuwayhi S
    Eur Rev Med Pharmacol Sci; 2023 Sep; 27(17):8019-8025. PubMed ID: 37750631
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 22. Effects of diode laser (980 nm) on orthodontic tooth movement and interleukin 6 levels in gingival crevicular fluid in female subjects.
    Yassaei S; Aghili H; Afshari JT; Bagherpour A; Eslami F
    Lasers Med Sci; 2016 Dec; 31(9):1751-1759. PubMed ID: 27680969
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 23. Quality of impressions after use of the Magic FoamCord gingival retraction system--a clinical study of 269 abutment teeth.
    Beier US; Kranewitter R; Dumfahrt H
    Int J Prosthodont; 2009; 22(2):143-7. PubMed ID: 19418859
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 24. Evaluation of Effectiveness of Three New Gingival Retraction Systems: A Comparative Study.
    Kumari S; Singh P; Parmar UG; Patel AM
    J Contemp Dent Pract; 2021 Aug; 22(8):922-927. PubMed ID: 34753845
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 25. Evaluation of gingival displacement methods in terms of periodontal health at crown restorations produced by digital scan: 1-year clinical follow-up.
    Ünalan Değirmenci B; Karadağ Naldemir B; Değirmenci A
    Lasers Med Sci; 2021 Aug; 36(6):1323-1335. PubMed ID: 33566189
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 26. Gingival retraction techniques for implants versus teeth: current status.
    Bennani V; Schwass D; Chandler N
    J Am Dent Assoc; 2008 Oct; 139(10):1354-63. PubMed ID: 18832271
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 27. New Zealand dentists' use of gingival retraction techniques for fixed prosthodontics and implants.
    Al-Ani A; Bennani V; Chandler NP; Lyons KM; Thomson WM
    N Z Dent J; 2010 Sep; 106(3):92-6. PubMed ID: 20882737
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 28. Comparative evaluation of three noninvasive gingival displacement systems: An
    Thimmappa M; Bhatia M; Somani P; Kumar DRV
    J Indian Prosthodont Soc; 2018; 18(2):122-130. PubMed ID: 29692565
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 29. Evaluation of gingival displacement, bleeding and ease of application for polytetrafluoroethylene (PTFE) and conventional retraction cord - a clinical trial.
    Nasim H; Lone MA; Kumar B; Ahmed N; Farooqui WA; Alsahhaf A; Alresayes S; Vohra F; Abduljabbar T
    Eur Rev Med Pharmacol Sci; 2023 Mar; 27(6):2222-2231. PubMed ID: 37013740
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 30. Laser gingival retraction: a quantitative assessment.
    Krishna Ch V; Gupta N; Reddy KM; Sekhar NC; Aditya V; Reddy GV
    J Clin Diagn Res; 2013 Aug; 7(8):1787-8. PubMed ID: 24086914
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 31. A Comparative Analysis of Post-Retraction Changes in Gingival Height after Conventional and Surgical Gingival Displacement: Rotary Curettage, Diode and Er:YAG Laser Troughing.
    Kazakova R; Vlahova A; Tomov G; Dimitrova M; Kazakov S; Zlatev S; Forte M; Barile G; Corsalini M; Capodiferro S
    Healthcare (Basel); 2023 Aug; 11(16):. PubMed ID: 37628460
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 32. [Gingival displacement techniques in daily practice. Survey among dental surgeons in Abidjan, Ivory Coast].
    Pesson DM; Bakou OD; Didia EL; Kouame A; Blohoua MR; Djeredou KB
    Odontostomatol Trop; 2015 Dec; 38(152):25-32. PubMed ID: 26939218
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 33. A randomized controlled clinical trial comparing the use of displacement cords and aluminum chloride paste.
    Bennani V; Aarts JM; Brunton P
    J Esthet Restor Dent; 2020 Jun; 32(4):410-415. PubMed ID: 32442353
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 34. Use of an erbium laser in lieu of retraction cord: a modern technique.
    Scott A
    Gen Dent; 2005; 53(2):116-9. PubMed ID: 15833012
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 35. Epinephrine absorption from commercial gingival retraction cords in clinical patients.
    Kellam SA; Smith JR; Scheffel SJ
    J Prosthet Dent; 1992 Nov; 68(5):761-5. PubMed ID: 1432796
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 36. Reproducibility of Buccal Gingival Profile Using a Custom Pick-Up Impression Technique: A 2-Year Prospective Multicenter Study.
    Lops D; Bressan E; Cea N; Sbricoli L; Guazzo R; Scanferla M; Romeo E
    J Esthet Restor Dent; 2016; 28(1):43-55. PubMed ID: 26358411
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 37. Tissue management with a new gingival retraction material: a preliminary clinical report.
    Ferrari M; Cagidiaco MC; Ercoli C
    J Prosthet Dent; 1996 Mar; 75(3):242-7. PubMed ID: 8648569
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 38. Laser Troughing to Improve Scanning and Impressions.
    Kurtzman GM; Agarwal T
    Dent Today; 2017 Jan; 36(1):122-5. PubMed ID: 29235779
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 39. Comparative evaluation of three gingival displacement materials for efficacy in tissue management and dimensional accuracy.
    Gajbhiye V; Banerjee R; Jaiswal P; Chandak A; Radke U
    J Indian Prosthodont Soc; 2019; 19(2):173-179. PubMed ID: 31040552
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 40. Efficiency of Cordless Versus Cord Techniques of Gingival Retraction: A Systematic Review.
    Huang C; Somar M; Li K; Mohadeb JVN
    J Prosthodont; 2017 Apr; 26(3):177-185. PubMed ID: 26378615
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Previous]   [Next]    [New Search]
    of 10.