These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

172 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 30029280)

  • 1. [Assessment of Mental Disorders].
    Dreßing H; Förster K; Schneider F
    Fortschr Neurol Psychiatr; 2018 Jul; 86(7):422-427. PubMed ID: 30029280
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. [Problem of a test method assessment of simulation and dissimulation in forensic expert testimony].
    Szegedi M
    Acta Med Leg Soc (Liege); 1986; 36(2):298-300. PubMed ID: 2979386
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. Clinical neuropsychology in the criminal forensic setting.
    Denney RL; Wynkoop TF
    J Head Trauma Rehabil; 2000 Apr; 15(2):804-28. PubMed ID: 10739969
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. Malingering in children: fibs and faking.
    Walker JS
    Child Adolesc Psychiatr Clin N Am; 2011 Jul; 20(3):547-56. PubMed ID: 21683919
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. The insanity defense: five years of research (1993-1997).
    Lymburner JA; Roesch R
    Int J Law Psychiatry; 1999; 22(3-4):213-40. PubMed ID: 10457921
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. The legal basis of forensic psychiatry: statutorily mandated psychiatric diagnoses.
    Bloom JD; Rogers JL
    Am J Psychiatry; 1987 Jul; 144(7):847-53. PubMed ID: 3605396
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. [Opinion of the Polish Psychiatric Association Management Office and Polish consultants about the use of forensic psychiatry in expert court testimony].
    Bomba J; Wciórka J; Puzyński S
    Psychiatr Pol; 2004; 38(2):198-200. PubMed ID: 15307285
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. [Methodics and aspects of postmortem forensic psychiatric expertise in a civil law suit].
    Ileĭko VR
    Lik Sprava; 2002; (7):30-2. PubMed ID: 12587300
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. The expert witness in forensic psychiatry.
    Chaplow DG; Peters JL; Kydd RR
    Aust N Z J Psychiatry; 1992 Dec; 26(4):624-30. PubMed ID: 1476528
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. [The diagnosis of simulation in forensic psychiatric practice].
    Pustovalov LV
    Sud Med Ekspert; 1994; 37(2):33-6. PubMed ID: 8009551
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. Lying in the medicolegal field: Malingering and psychodiagnostic assessment.
    Cassano A; Grattagliano I
    Clin Ter; 2019; 170(2):e134-e141. PubMed ID: 30993310
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. Interpreting clinical evidence of malingering: a Bayesian perspective.
    Mossman D
    J Am Acad Psychiatry Law; 2000; 28(3):293-302. PubMed ID: 11055526
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. To what extent should expert psychiatric witnesses comment on criminal culpability?
    Hallett N
    Med Sci Law; 2020 Jan; 60(1):67-74. PubMed ID: 31483744
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. Psychological testing and the assessment of malingering.
    McDermott BE
    Psychiatr Clin North Am; 2012 Dec; 35(4):855-76. PubMed ID: 23107567
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. Minimizing the influence of unconscious bias in evaluations: a practical guide.
    Goldyne AJ
    J Am Acad Psychiatry Law; 2007; 35(1):60-6. PubMed ID: 17389346
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. [Assessment of malingering and dissimulation in the examination of subjects with mental and psychosomatic disorders].
    Dohrenbusch R; Henningsen R; Merten T
    Versicherungsmedizin; 2011 Jun; 63(2):81-5. PubMed ID: 21698944
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. A comparison of simulation and known groups in the detection of malingering on the MMPI-2.
    Kucharski LT; Johnsen D
    J Forensic Sci; 2002 Sep; 47(5):1078-82. PubMed ID: 12353551
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. [Differences in psychiatric expertise of responsibility: Assessment and initial hypotheses through a review of literature].
    Guivarch J; Piercecchi-Marti MD; Glezer D; Chabannes JM
    Encephale; 2015 Jun; 41(3):244-50. PubMed ID: 25864036
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. [Ethical problems in forensic-psychiatric assessment].
    Barbey I
    Psychiatr Prax; 1988 Sep; 15(5):176-81. PubMed ID: 3054984
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. Disabled doctors: the insurance industry seeks a second opinion.
    Wall BW; Appelbaum KL
    J Am Acad Psychiatry Law; 1998; 26(1):7-19. PubMed ID: 9554705
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 9.