These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.
202 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 30029348)
1. The importance of landscape characteristics for the delivery of cultural ecosystem services. Ridding LE; Redhead JW; Oliver TH; Schmucki R; McGinlay J; Graves AR; Morris J; Bradbury RB; King H; Bullock JM J Environ Manage; 2018 Jan; 206():1145-1154. PubMed ID: 30029348 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
2. [Evaluation of ecosystem cultural services of urban protected areas based on public participation GIS (PPGIS): A case study of Gongqing Forest Park in Shanghai, China]. Peng WT; Liu WQ; Cai WB; Wang X; Huang Z; Wu CZ Ying Yong Sheng Tai Xue Bao; 2019 Feb; 30(2):439-448. PubMed ID: 30915794 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
3. Mapping and assessment of landscape aesthetic quality in Lithuania. Kalinauskas M; Mikša K; Inácio M; Gomes E; Pereira P J Environ Manage; 2021 May; 286():112239. PubMed ID: 33662753 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
4. [Landscape ecological planning of Jiaozuo city]. Wang W; Fang C; Li H Ying Yong Sheng Tai Xue Bao; 2005 Sep; 16(9):1724-8. PubMed ID: 16355790 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
5. Participatory mapping of cultural ecosystem services for landscape corridor planning: A case study of the Silk Roads corridor in Zhangye, China. Xu H; Zhao G; Fagerholm N; Primdahl J; Plieninger T J Environ Manage; 2020 Jun; 264():110458. PubMed ID: 32250892 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
6. Quantifying the visual-sensory landscape qualities that contribute to cultural ecosystem services using social media and LiDAR. Van Berkel DB; Tabrizian P; Dorning MA; Smart L; Newcomb D; Mehaffey M; Neale A; Meentemeyer RK Ecosyst Serv; 2018; 31():326-335. PubMed ID: 30148061 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
7. Mapping and assessing coastal recreation cultural ecosystem services supply, flow, and demand in Lithuania. Inácio M; Gomes E; Bogdzevič K; Kalinauskas M; Zhao W; Pereira P J Environ Manage; 2022 Dec; 323():116175. PubMed ID: 36088764 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
8. Mapping bundles of ecosystem services reveals distinct types of multifunctionality within a Swedish landscape. Queiroz C; Meacham M; Richter K; Norström AV; Andersson E; Norberg J; Peterson G Ambio; 2015 Jan; 44 Suppl 1(Suppl 1):S89-101. PubMed ID: 25576284 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
9. Assessing the influences of ecological restoration on perceptions of cultural ecosystem services by residents of agricultural landscapes of western China. Dou Y; Zhen L; Yu X; Bakker M; Carsjens GJ; Xue Z Sci Total Environ; 2019 Jan; 646():685-695. PubMed ID: 30059928 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
10. [Spatial evaluation on ecological and aesthetic quality of Beijing agricultural landscape]. Pan Y; Xiao H; Yu ZR Ying Yong Sheng Tai Xue Bao; 2009 Oct; 20(10):2455-60. PubMed ID: 20077704 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
11. Impacts of road network expansion on landscape ecological risk in a megacity, China: A case study of Beijing. Mo W; Wang Y; Zhang Y; Zhuang D Sci Total Environ; 2017 Jan; 574():1000-1011. PubMed ID: 27668852 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
12. The impact of urban planning on land use and land cover in Pudong of Shanghai, China. Zhao B; Nakagoshi N; Chen JK; Kong LY J Environ Sci (China); 2003 Mar; 15(2):205-14. PubMed ID: 12765263 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
13. Integrating spatial-temporal soundscape mapping with landscape indicators for effective conservation management and planning of a protected area. Xu X; Baydur C; Feng J; Wu C J Environ Manage; 2024 Apr; 356():120555. PubMed ID: 38527384 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
14. [Urban ecosystem services: A review]. Mao QZ; Huang GL; Wu JG Ying Yong Sheng Tai Xue Bao; 2015 Apr; 26(4):1023-33. PubMed ID: 26259442 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
15. Interacting Social and Environmental Predictors for the Spatial Distribution of Conservation Lands. Baldwin RF; Leonard PB PLoS One; 2015; 10(10):e0140540. PubMed ID: 26465155 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
17. [Ecological land use in three towns of eastern Beijing: a case study based on landscape security pattern analysis]. Yu KJ; Qiao Q; Li DH; Yuan H; Wang SS Ying Yong Sheng Tai Xue Bao; 2009 Aug; 20(8):1932-9. PubMed ID: 19947214 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
18. [Ecological environmental quality assessment of Hangzhou urban area based on RS and GIS]. Xu P; Zhao D Ying Yong Sheng Tai Xue Bao; 2006 Jun; 17(6):1034-8. PubMed ID: 16964936 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
19. [Changes of land use and landscape pattern in Taihu Lake Basin]. Wan R; Yang G Ying Yong Sheng Tai Xue Bao; 2005 Mar; 16(3):475-80. PubMed ID: 15943360 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
20. Change in landscape and ecosystems services as the basis of monitoring natural protected areas: a case study in the Picos de Europa National Park (Spain). De Pablo CL; Peñalver-Alcázar M; De Agar PM Environ Monit Assess; 2020 Mar; 192(4):220. PubMed ID: 32146535 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related] [Next] [New Search]