These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

148 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 30030588)

  • 1. The oddball effect on P3 disappears when feature relevance or feature-response mappings are unknown.
    Verleger R; Keppeler M; Sassenhagen J; Śmigasiewicz K
    Exp Brain Res; 2018 Oct; 236(10):2781-2796. PubMed ID: 30030588
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. Effects of response delays and of unknown stimulus-response mappings on the oddball effect on P3.
    Verleger R; Grauhan N; Śmigasiewicz K
    Psychophysiology; 2016 Dec; 53(12):1858-1869. PubMed ID: 27593167
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. Testing the S-R link hypothesis of P3b: The oddball effect on S1-evoked P3 gets reduced by increased task relevance of S2.
    Verleger R; Hamann LM; Asanowicz D; Śmigasiewicz K
    Biol Psychol; 2015 May; 108():25-35. PubMed ID: 25797104
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. Testing the stimulus-to-response bridging function of the oddball-P3 by delayed response signals and residue iteration decomposition (RIDE).
    Verleger R; Metzner MF; Ouyang G; Śmigasiewicz K; Zhou C
    Neuroimage; 2014 Oct; 100():271-80. PubMed ID: 24960419
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. EEG gamma-band activity in rapid serial visual presentation.
    Kranczioch C; Debener S; Herrmann CS; Engel AK
    Exp Brain Res; 2006 Feb; 169(2):246-54. PubMed ID: 16328311
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. Is P3 a strategic or a tactical component? Relationships of P3 sub-components to response times in oddball tasks with go, no-go and choice responses.
    Verleger R; Grauhan N; Śmigasiewicz K
    Neuroimage; 2016 Dec; 143():223-234. PubMed ID: 27570107
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. The unstable bridge from stimulus processing to correct responding in Parkinson's disease.
    Verleger R; Schroll H; Hamker FH
    Neuropsychologia; 2013 Nov; 51(13):2512-25. PubMed ID: 24051004
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. The hard oddball: effects of difficult response selection on stimulus-related P3 and on response-related negative potentials.
    Verleger R; Baur N; Metzner MF; Smigasiewicz K
    Psychophysiology; 2014 Nov; 51(11):1089-100. PubMed ID: 24981371
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. The auditory-evoked N2 and P3 components in the stop-signal task: indices of inhibition, response-conflict or error-detection?
    Dimoska A; Johnstone SJ; Barry RJ
    Brain Cogn; 2006 Nov; 62(2):98-112. PubMed ID: 16814442
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. Effects on P3 of spreading targets and response prompts apart.
    Verleger R; Siller B; Ouyang G; Śmigasiewicz K
    Biol Psychol; 2017 May; 126():1-11. PubMed ID: 28366558
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. Effect of negatively valenced words on deviant P3 during the three-stimulus oddball paradigm.
    Ishida M; Kaneda M; Akamine A; Sakakibara M
    Neurosci Lett; 2018 Sep; 683():38-42. PubMed ID: 29906482
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. Go and no-go P3 with rare and frequent stimuli in oddball tasks: A study comparing key-pressing with counting.
    Verleger R; Grauhan N; Śmigasiewicz K
    Int J Psychophysiol; 2016 Dec; 110():128-136. PubMed ID: 27845155
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. Stimulus context determines whether non-target stimuli are processed as task-relevant or distractor information.
    Sawaki R; Katayama J
    Clin Neurophysiol; 2006 Nov; 117(11):2532-9. PubMed ID: 17005448
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. Reduced brain responses to novel sounds in depression: P3 findings in a novelty oddball task.
    Bruder GE; Kroppmann CJ; Kayser J; Stewart JW; McGrath PJ; Tenke CE
    Psychiatry Res; 2009 Dec; 170(2-3):218-23. PubMed ID: 19900720
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. Dissociating love-related attention from task-related attention: an event-related potential oddball study.
    Langeslag SJ; Franken IH; Van Strien JW
    Neurosci Lett; 2008 Feb; 431(3):236-40. PubMed ID: 18162320
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. Distractor P3 is associated with attentional capture by stimulus deviance.
    Sawaki R; Katayama J
    Clin Neurophysiol; 2008 Jun; 119(6):1300-9. PubMed ID: 18411071
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. Can working memory predict target-to-target interval effects in the P300?
    Steiner GZ; Barry RJ; Gonsalvez CJ
    Int J Psychophysiol; 2013 Sep; 89(3):399-408. PubMed ID: 23933170
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. Do Rare Stimuli Evoke Large P3s by Being Unexpected? A Comparison of Oddball Effects Between Standard-Oddball and Prediction-Oddball Tasks.
    Verleger R; Śmigasiewicz K
    Adv Cogn Psychol; 2016; 12(2):88-104. PubMed ID: 27512527
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. Differential modulation of the N2 and P3 event-related potentials by response conflict and inhibition.
    Groom MJ; Cragg L
    Brain Cogn; 2015 Jul; 97():1-9. PubMed ID: 25955278
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. The influence of stimulus deviance and novelty on the P300 and novelty P3.
    Goldstein A; Spencer KM; Donchin E
    Psychophysiology; 2002 Nov; 39(6):781-90. PubMed ID: 12462506
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 8.