499 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 30030638)
1. Risk valuation of ecological resources at contaminated deactivation and decommissioning facilities: methodology and a case study at the Department of Energy's Hanford site.
Burger J; Gochfeld M; Jeitner C
Environ Monit Assess; 2018 Jul; 190(8):478. PubMed ID: 30030638
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
2. Risk to ecological resources following remediation can be due mainly to increased resource value of successful restoration: A case study from the Department of Energy's Hanford Site.
Burger J; Gochfeld M; Kosson DS; Brown KG; Salisbury JA; Jeitner C
Environ Res; 2020 Jul; 186():109536. PubMed ID: 32344209
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
3. Evaluation of ecological resources at operating facilities at contaminated sites: The Department of Energy's Hanford Site as a case study.
Burger J; Gochfeld M; Kosson DS; Brown KG; Salisbury JA; Jeitner C
Environ Res; 2019 Mar; 170():452-462. PubMed ID: 30640079
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
4. Importance of buffer lands to determining risk to ecological resources at legacy contaminated sites: A case study for the Department of Energy's Hanford Site, Washington, USA.
Burger J; Gochfeld M; Jeitner C
J Toxicol Environ Health A; 2019; 82(22):1151-1163. PubMed ID: 31852396
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
5. A Methodology to Evaluate Ecological Resources and Risk Using Two Case Studies at the Department of Energy's Hanford Site.
Burger J; Gochfeld M; Bunn A; Downs J; Jeitner C; Pittfield T; Salisbury J; Kosson D
Environ Manage; 2017 Mar; 59(3):357-372. PubMed ID: 27904947
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
6. Contaminated Department of Energy facilities and ecosystems: weighing the ecological risks.
Burger J
J Toxicol Environ Health A; 2000 Sep; 61(2):141-54. PubMed ID: 11032427
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
7. A paradigm for protecting ecological resources following remediation as a function of future land use designations: a case study for the Department of Energy's Hanford Site.
Burger J; Gochfeld M; Kosson DS; Brown KG; Salisbury J; Jeitner C
Environ Monit Assess; 2020 Feb; 192(3):181. PubMed ID: 32065319
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
8. A framework for increasing sustainability and reducing risk to ecological resources through integration of remediation planning and implementation.
Burger J
Environ Res; 2019 May; 172():586-595. PubMed ID: 30875512
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
9. The costs of delaying remediation on human, ecological, and eco-cultural resources: Considerations for the Department of Energy: A methodological framework.
Burger J; Gochfeld M; Kosson DS; Brown KG; Bliss LS; Bunn A; Clarke JH; Mayer HJ; Salisbury JA
Sci Total Environ; 2019 Feb; 649():1054-1064. PubMed ID: 30308877
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
10. The role of risk and future land use in cleanup decisions at the Department Of Energy.
Burger J; Powers C; Greenberg M; Gochfeld M
Risk Anal; 2004 Dec; 24(6):1539-49. PubMed ID: 15660610
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
11. Environmental management: integrating ecological evaluation, remediation, restoration, natural resource damage assessment and long-term stewardship on contaminated lands.
Burger J
Sci Total Environ; 2008 Aug; 400(1-3):6-19. PubMed ID: 18687455
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
12. Combining ecological, eco-cultural, and environmental justice parameters to create Eco-EJ indicators to monitor cultural and environmental justices for diverse communities around contaminated sites.
Burger J; Gochfeld M; Kosson DS; Brown KG; Salisbury J; Greenberg M; Jeitner C
Environ Monit Assess; 2022 Feb; 194(3):177. PubMed ID: 35150318
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
13. A decision framework for possible remediation of contaminated sediments in the River Kymijoki, Finland.
Verta M; Kiviranta H; Salo S; Malve O; Korhonen M; Verkasalo PK; Ruokojärvi P; Rossi E; Hanski A; Päätalo K; Vartiainen T
Environ Sci Pollut Res Int; 2009 Jan; 16(1):95-105. PubMed ID: 18941816
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
14. Shifting priorities at the Department of Energy's bomb factories: protecting human and ecological health.
Burger J; Leschine TM; Greenberg M; Karr JR; Gochfeld M; Powers CW
Environ Manage; 2003 Feb; 31(2):157-67. PubMed ID: 12520373
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
15. Integrating long-term stewardship goals into the remediation process: natural resource damages and the Department of Energy.
Burger J; Gochfeld M; Powers CW
J Environ Manage; 2007 Jan; 82(2):189-99. PubMed ID: 16554118
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
16. Conceptual site models as a tool in evaluating ecological health: the case of the Department of Energy's Amchitka Island nuclear test site.
Burger J; Mayer HJ; Greenberg M; Powers CW; Volz CD; Gochfeld M
J Toxicol Environ Health A; 2006 Jul; 69(13):1217-38. PubMed ID: 16754537
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
17. Role of uncertainties in protecting ecological resources during remediation and restoration.
Burger J; Gochfeld M; Bunn A; Looney B; Jeitner C
J Toxicol Environ Health A; 2021 Jun; 84(12):485-502. PubMed ID: 33632081
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
18. Costs and Benefits of Delaying Remediation on Ecological Resources at Contaminated Sites.
Burger J
Ecohealth; 2019 Sep; 16(3):454-475. PubMed ID: 31377906
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
19. [Environment and health in Gela (Sicily): present knowledge and prospects for future studies].
Musmeci L; Bianchi F; Carere M; Cori L
Epidemiol Prev; 2009; 33(3 Suppl 1):7-12. PubMed ID: 19776462
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
20. Integrated risk and recovery monitoring of ecosystem restorations on contaminated sites.
Hooper MJ; Glomb SJ; Harper DD; Hoelzle TB; McIntosh LM; Mulligan DR
Integr Environ Assess Manag; 2016 Apr; 12(2):284-95. PubMed ID: 26465231
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
[Next] [New Search]
