These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

275 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 30030691)

  • 1. The influence of relevant and irrelevant stereoscopic depth cues: Depth information does not always capture attention.
    Plewan T; Rinkenauer G
    Atten Percept Psychophys; 2018 Nov; 80(8):1996-2007. PubMed ID: 30030691
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. Allocation of attention in 3D space is adaptively modulated by relative position of target and distractor stimuli.
    Plewan T; Rinkenauer G
    Atten Percept Psychophys; 2020 Jun; 82(3):1063-1073. PubMed ID: 31773511
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. Visual search in virtual 3D space: the relation of multiple targets and distractors.
    Plewan T; Rinkenauer G
    Psychol Res; 2021 Sep; 85(6):2151-2162. PubMed ID: 33388993
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. Attentional control within 3-D space.
    Theeuwes J; Atchley P; Kramer AF
    J Exp Psychol Hum Percept Perform; 1998 Oct; 24(5):1476-85. PubMed ID: 9988599
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. Effects of relevant and irrelevant color singletons on inhibition of return and attentional capture.
    Ansorge U; Priess HW; Kerzel D
    Atten Percept Psychophys; 2013 Nov; 75(8):1687-702. PubMed ID: 24027028
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. Feature-based statistical regularities of distractors modulate attentional capture.
    Stilwell BT; Bahle B; Vecera SP
    J Exp Psychol Hum Percept Perform; 2019 Mar; 45(3):419-433. PubMed ID: 30802131
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. Involuntary top-down control by search-irrelevant features: Visual working memory biases attention in an object-based manner.
    Foerster RM; Schneider WX
    Cognition; 2018 Mar; 172():37-45. PubMed ID: 29223864
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. The role of top-down spatial attention in contingent attentional capture.
    Huang W; Su Y; Zhen Y; Qu Z
    Psychophysiology; 2016 May; 53(5):650-62. PubMed ID: 26879628
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. Capture by colour: evidence for dimension-specific singleton capture.
    Harris AM; Becker SI; Remington RW
    Atten Percept Psychophys; 2015 Oct; 77(7):2305-21. PubMed ID: 26018643
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. Towards a resolution of the attentional-capture debate.
    Carmel T; Lamy D
    J Exp Psychol Hum Percept Perform; 2015 Dec; 41(6):1772-82. PubMed ID: 26280266
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. Does focused endogenous attention prevent attentional capture in pop-out visual search?
    Seiss E; Kiss M; Eimer M
    Psychophysiology; 2009 Jul; 46(4):703-17. PubMed ID: 19473304
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. Irrelevant singletons in visual search do not capture attention but can produce nonspatial filtering costs.
    Wykowska A; Schubö A
    J Cogn Neurosci; 2011 Mar; 23(3):645-60. PubMed ID: 19929330
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. Surprising depth cue captures attention in visual search.
    Plewan T; Rinkenauer G
    Psychon Bull Rev; 2018 Aug; 25(4):1358-1364. PubMed ID: 28980191
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. Attentional control during visual search: the effect of irrelevant singletons.
    Theeuwes J; Burger R
    J Exp Psychol Hum Percept Perform; 1998 Oct; 24(5):1342-53. PubMed ID: 9778827
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. Attentional dwelling and capture by color singletons.
    Ruthruff E; Faulks M; Maxwell JW; Gaspelin N
    Atten Percept Psychophys; 2020 Aug; 82(6):3048-3064. PubMed ID: 32483661
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. Depth modulation of the attentional repulsion effect.
    Chien SE; Watanabe K
    Perception; 2013; 42(12):1333-43. PubMed ID: 24649635
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. Integrating space and time in visual search: how the preview benefit is modulated by stereoscopic depth.
    Dent K; Braithwaite JJ; He X; Humphreys GW
    Vision Res; 2012 Jul; 65():45-61. PubMed ID: 22728923
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. Causal involvement of visual area MT in global feature-based enhancement but not contingent attentional capture.
    Painter DR; Dux PE; Mattingley JB
    Neuroimage; 2015 Sep; 118():90-102. PubMed ID: 26067347
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. Hold the future, let the past go: attention prefers the features of future targets.
    Du F; Zhang K; Abrams RA
    Cognition; 2014 May; 131(2):205-15. PubMed ID: 24549143
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. Rewarded visual items capture attention only in heterogeneous contexts.
    Feldmann-Wüstefeld T; Brandhofer R; Schubö A
    Psychophysiology; 2016 Jul; 53(7):1063-73. PubMed ID: 26997364
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 14.