279 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 30031354)
1. Development of electrophysiological and behavioural measures of electrode discrimination in adult cochlear implant users.
Mathew R; Vickers D; Boyle P; Shaida A; Selvadurai D; Jiang D; Undurraga J
Hear Res; 2018 Sep; 367():74-87. PubMed ID: 30031354
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
2. Objective assessment of electrode discrimination with the auditory change complex in adult cochlear implant users.
Mathew R; Undurraga J; Li G; Meerton L; Boyle P; Shaida A; Selvadurai D; Jiang D; Vickers D
Hear Res; 2017 Oct; 354():86-101. PubMed ID: 28826636
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
3. Fitting prelingually deafened adult cochlear implant users based on electrode discrimination performance.
Debruyne JA; Francart T; Janssen AM; Douma K; Brokx JP
Int J Audiol; 2017 Mar; 56(3):174-185. PubMed ID: 27758152
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
4. Changes in visually and auditory attended audiovisual speech processing in cochlear implant users: A longitudinal ERP study.
Weglage A; Layer N; Meister H; Müller V; Lang-Roth R; Walger M; Sandmann P
Hear Res; 2024 Jun; 447():109023. PubMed ID: 38733710
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
5. Cortical reorganization in postlingually deaf cochlear implant users: Intra-modal and cross-modal considerations.
Stropahl M; Chen LC; Debener S
Hear Res; 2017 Jan; 343():128-137. PubMed ID: 27473503
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
6. Cortical auditory evoked potentials in cochlear implant listeners via single electrode stimulation in relation to speech perception.
Liebscher T; Alberter K; Hoppe U
Int J Audiol; 2018 Dec; 57(12):933-940. PubMed ID: 30295156
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
7. Plasticity in bilateral superior temporal cortex: Effects of deafness and cochlear implantation on auditory and visual speech processing.
Anderson CA; Lazard DS; Hartley DE
Hear Res; 2017 Jan; 343():138-149. PubMed ID: 27473501
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
8. Relationships Among Peripheral and Central Electrophysiological Measures of Spatial and Spectral Selectivity and Speech Perception in Cochlear Implant Users.
Scheperle RA; Abbas PJ
Ear Hear; 2015; 36(4):441-53. PubMed ID: 25658746
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
9. Assessment of responses to cochlear implant stimulation at different levels of the auditory pathway.
Abbas PJ; Brown CJ
Hear Res; 2015 Apr; 322():67-76. PubMed ID: 25445817
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
10. Categorisation of natural sounds at different stages of auditory recovery in cochlear implant adult deaf patients.
Strelnikov K; Collett E; Gaillard P; Truy E; Déguine O; Marx M; Barone P
Hear Res; 2018 Sep; 367():182-194. PubMed ID: 29914727
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
11. What can we expect of normally-developing children implanted at a young age with respect to their auditory, linguistic and cognitive skills?
van Wieringen A; Wouters J
Hear Res; 2015 Apr; 322():171-9. PubMed ID: 25219955
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
12. Adjustments of the amplitude mapping function: Sensitivity of cochlear implant users and effects on subjective preference and speech recognition.
Theelen-van den Hoek FL; Boymans M; van Dijk B; Dreschler WA
Int J Audiol; 2016 Nov; 55(11):674-87. PubMed ID: 27447758
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
13. Perception and coding of interaural time differences with bilateral cochlear implants.
Laback B; Egger K; Majdak P
Hear Res; 2015 Apr; 322():138-50. PubMed ID: 25456088
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
14. The MMN as a viable and objective marker of auditory development in CI users.
Näätänen R; Petersen B; Torppa R; Lonka E; Vuust P
Hear Res; 2017 Sep; 353():57-75. PubMed ID: 28800468
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
15. Assessing auditory nerve condition by tone decay in deaf subjects with a cochlear implant.
Wasmann JA; van Eijl RHM; Versnel H; van Zanten GA
Int J Audiol; 2018 Nov; 57(11):864-871. PubMed ID: 30261773
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
16. Effect of stimulus level on the temporal response properties of the auditory nerve in cochlear implants.
Hughes ML; Laurello SA
Hear Res; 2017 Aug; 351():116-129. PubMed ID: 28633960
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
17. Speech rate, rate-matching, and intelligibility in early-implanted cochlear implant users.
Freeman V; Pisoni DB
J Acoust Soc Am; 2017 Aug; 142(2):1043. PubMed ID: 28863583
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
18. Perceptual changes with monopolar and phantom electrode stimulation.
Klawitter S; Landsberger DM; Büchner A; Nogueira W
Hear Res; 2018 Mar; 359():64-75. PubMed ID: 29325874
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
19. Effects of congruent and incongruent visual cues on speech perception and brain activity in cochlear implant users.
Song JJ; Lee HJ; Kang H; Lee DS; Chang SO; Oh SH
Brain Struct Funct; 2015 Mar; 220(2):1109-25. PubMed ID: 24402676
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
20. Spectro-temporal cues enhance modulation sensitivity in cochlear implant users.
Zheng Y; Escabí M; Litovsky RY
Hear Res; 2017 Aug; 351():45-54. PubMed ID: 28601530
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
[Next] [New Search]
