281 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 30031354)
41. Perceptual Differences Between Low-Frequency Analog and Pulsatile Stimulation as Shown by Single- and Multidimensional Scaling.
Stupak N; Padilla M; Morse RP; Landsberger DM
Trends Hear; 2018; 22():2331216518807535. PubMed ID: 30378468
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
42. PET-imaging of brain plasticity after cochlear implantation.
Strelnikov K; Marx M; Lagleyre S; Fraysse B; Deguine O; Barone P
Hear Res; 2015 Apr; 322():180-7. PubMed ID: 25448166
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
43. Beta-band activity in auditory pathways reflects speech localization and recognition in bilateral cochlear implant users.
Senkowski D; Pomper U; Fitzner I; Engel AK; Kral A
Hum Brain Mapp; 2014 Jul; 35(7):3107-21. PubMed ID: 24123535
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
44. What can stimulus polarity and interphase gap tell us about auditory nerve function in cochlear-implant recipients?
Hughes ML; Choi S; Glickman E
Hear Res; 2018 Mar; 359():50-63. PubMed ID: 29307495
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
45. Relationship between channel interaction and spectral-ripple discrimination in cochlear implant users.
Jones GL; Won JH; Drennan WR; Rubinstein JT
J Acoust Soc Am; 2013 Jan; 133(1):425-33. PubMed ID: 23297914
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
46. Gradual adaptation to auditory frequency mismatch.
Svirsky MA; Talavage TM; Sinha S; Neuburger H; Azadpour M
Hear Res; 2015 Apr; 322():163-70. PubMed ID: 25445816
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
47. Spatial and non-spatial multisensory cueing in unilateral cochlear implant users.
Pavani F; Venturini M; Baruffaldi F; Artesini L; Bonfioli F; Frau GN; van Zoest W
Hear Res; 2017 Feb; 344():24-37. PubMed ID: 27810286
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
48. Age-Related Changes in Temporal Resolution Revisited: Electrophysiological and Behavioral Findings From Cochlear Implant Users.
Mussoi BSS; Brown CJ
Ear Hear; 2019; 40(6):1328-1344. PubMed ID: 31033701
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
49. Deactivating cochlear implant electrodes to improve speech perception: A computational approach.
Sagi E; Svirsky MA
Hear Res; 2018 Dec; 370():316-328. PubMed ID: 30396747
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
50. Voice emotion perception and production in cochlear implant users.
Jiam NT; Caldwell M; Deroche ML; Chatterjee M; Limb CJ
Hear Res; 2017 Sep; 352():30-39. PubMed ID: 28088500
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
51. Speech perception with interaction-compensated simultaneous stimulation and long pulse durations in cochlear implant users.
Schatzer R; Koroleva I; Griessner A; Levin S; Kusovkov V; Yanov Y; Zierhofer C
Hear Res; 2015 Apr; 322():99-106. PubMed ID: 25457654
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
52. Cortical Processing of Frequency Changes Reflected by the Acoustic Change Complex in Adult Cochlear Implant Users.
Liang C; Houston LM; Samy RN; Abedelrehim LMI; Zhang F
Audiol Neurootol; 2018; 23(3):152-164. PubMed ID: 30300882
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
53. Musical pitch and lexical tone perception with cochlear implants.
Wang W; Zhou N; Xu L
Int J Audiol; 2011 Apr; 50(4):270-8. PubMed ID: 21190394
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
54. Pitch adaptation patterns in bimodal cochlear implant users: over time and after experience.
Reiss LA; Ito RA; Eggleston JL; Liao S; Becker JJ; Lakin CE; Warren FM; McMenomey SO
Ear Hear; 2015; 36(2):e23-34. PubMed ID: 25319401
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
55. Optimal gain control step sizes for bimodal stimulation.
Spirrov D; van Dijk B; Francart T
Int J Audiol; 2018 Mar; 57(3):184-193. PubMed ID: 29172895
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
56. Musical and vocal emotion perception for cochlear implants users.
Paquette S; Ahmed GD; Goffi-Gomez MV; Hoshino ACH; Peretz I; Lehmann A
Hear Res; 2018 Dec; 370():272-282. PubMed ID: 30181063
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
57. Long-term Average Speech Spectra of Postlingual Cochlear Implant Users.
Yüksel M; Gündüz B
J Voice; 2019 Mar; 33(2):255.e19-255.e25. PubMed ID: 29329722
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
58. Comparing spatial tuning curves, spectral ripple resolution, and speech perception in cochlear implant users.
Anderson ES; Nelson DA; Kreft H; Nelson PB; Oxenham AJ
J Acoust Soc Am; 2011 Jul; 130(1):364-75. PubMed ID: 21786905
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
59. Spatial hearing in a child with auditory neuropathy spectrum disorder and bilateral cochlear implants.
Johnstone PM; Yeager KR; Noss E
Int J Audiol; 2013 Jun; 52(6):400-8. PubMed ID: 23586418
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
60. Cortical auditory evoked potentials as an objective measure of behavioral thresholds in cochlear implant users.
Visram AS; Innes-Brown H; El-Deredy W; McKay CM
Hear Res; 2015 Sep; 327():35-42. PubMed ID: 25959269
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
[Previous] [Next] [New Search]
