These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

154 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 30031371)

  • 21. A new way to find evidence quickly and efficiently.
    Rada G; Neumann I; Cerda J
    Medwave; 2014 Nov; 14(10):e6044. PubMed ID: 25513884
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 22. The methodological quality assessment tools for preclinical and clinical studies, systematic review and meta-analysis, and clinical practice guideline: a systematic review.
    Zeng X; Zhang Y; Kwong JS; Zhang C; Li S; Sun F; Niu Y; Du L
    J Evid Based Med; 2015 Feb; 8(1):2-10. PubMed ID: 25594108
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 23. Evidence-based medicine, systematic reviews, and guidelines in interventional pain management, part I: introduction and general considerations.
    Manchikanti L
    Pain Physician; 2008; 11(2):161-86. PubMed ID: 18354710
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 24. The refinement of topics for systematic reviews: lessons and recommendations from the Effective Health Care Program.
    Buckley DI; Ansari MT; Butler M; Soh C; Chang CS
    J Clin Epidemiol; 2014 Apr; 67(4):425-32. PubMed ID: 24581296
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 25. Narrative hermeneutics: in search of narrative data.
    Wiklund-Gustin L
    Scand J Caring Sci; 2010 Dec; 24 Suppl 1():32-7. PubMed ID: 21070311
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 26. How to conduct systematic reviews more expeditiously?
    Tsertsvadze A; Chen YF; Moher D; Sutcliffe P; McCarthy N
    Syst Rev; 2015 Nov; 4():160. PubMed ID: 26563648
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 27. Best Evidence Medical Education (BEME) review process redesigned for methodological rigor, shorter timeline and author support.
    Corral J; Mortaz Hejri S; van Schalkwyk S; Gordon M
    Med Teach; 2017 Aug; 39(8):898. PubMed ID: 28485686
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 28. Increasing the Incidence and Influence of Systematic Reviews on Health Policy and Practice.
    Chalmers I; Fox DM
    Am J Public Health; 2016 Jan; 106(1):11-3. PubMed ID: 26562111
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 29. Undertaking a literature review: a step-by-step approach.
    Cronin P; Ryan F; Coughlan M
    Br J Nurs; 2008 Jan 10-23; 17(1):38-43. PubMed ID: 18399395
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 30. Reviewing the research methods literature: principles and strategies illustrated by a systematic overview of sampling in qualitative research.
    Gentles SJ; Charles C; Nicholas DB; Ploeg J; McKibbon KA
    Syst Rev; 2016 Oct; 5(1):172. PubMed ID: 27729071
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 31. Systematic reviews and meta-analysis: studies of studies.
    Engberg S
    J Wound Ostomy Continence Nurs; 2008; 35(3):258-65. PubMed ID: 18496080
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 32. Innovations in the systematic review of text and opinion.
    McArthur A; Klugárová J; Yan H; Florescu S
    Int J Evid Based Healthc; 2015 Sep; 13(3):188-95. PubMed ID: 26207851
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 33. How to conduct a high-quality systematic review on diagnostic research topics.
    Yao X; Vella E; Brouwers M
    Surg Oncol; 2018 Mar; 27(1):70-75. PubMed ID: 29549907
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 34. How to prepare a systematic review of economic evaluations for informing evidence-based healthcare decisions: a five-step approach (part 1/3).
    van Mastrigt GA; Hiligsmann M; Arts JJ; Broos PH; Kleijnen J; Evers SM; Majoie MH
    Expert Rev Pharmacoecon Outcomes Res; 2016 Dec; 16(6):689-704. PubMed ID: 27805469
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 35. A framework for best evidence approaches can improve the transparency of systematic reviews.
    Treadwell JR; Singh S; Talati R; McPheeters ML; Reston JT
    J Clin Epidemiol; 2012 Nov; 65(11):1159-62. PubMed ID: 23017634
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 36. Time to challenge the spurious hierarchy of systematic over narrative reviews?
    Greenhalgh T; Thorne S; Malterud K
    Eur J Clin Invest; 2018 Jun; 48(6):e12931. PubMed ID: 29578574
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 37. Identification of problems in search strategies in Cochrane Reviews.
    Franco JVA; Garrote VL; Escobar Liquitay CM; Vietto V
    Res Synth Methods; 2018 Sep; 9(3):408-416. PubMed ID: 29761662
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 38. [The systematic review is the foundation of evidence based medicine. One of the most important contributions to clinical medicine of the past decade].
    Eliasson M
    Lakartidningen; 2000 May; 97(22):2726-8. PubMed ID: 10900892
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 39. Narrative ethics for narrative care.
    Baldwin C
    J Aging Stud; 2015 Aug; 34():183-9. PubMed ID: 26162740
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 40. Evidence mapping for decision making: feasibility versus accuracy - when to abandon high sensitivity in electronic searches.
    Buchberger B; Krabbe L; Lux B; Mattivi JT
    Ger Med Sci; 2016; 14():Doc09. PubMed ID: 27499726
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Previous]   [Next]    [New Search]
    of 8.