125 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 30031614)
1. Discrepancy Rates and Clinical Impact of Imaging Secondary Interpretations: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis.
Rosenkrantz AB; Duszak R; Babb JS; Glover M; Kang SK
J Am Coll Radiol; 2018 Sep; 15(9):1222-1231. PubMed ID: 30031614
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
2. Clinical Impact of Second-Opinion Musculoskeletal Subspecialty Interpretations During a Multidisciplinary Orthopedic Oncology Conference.
Rozenberg A; Kenneally BE; Abraham JA; Strogus K; Roedl JB; Morrison WB; Zoga AC
J Am Coll Radiol; 2017 Jul; 14(7):931-936. PubMed ID: 28238666
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
3. Second opinion interpretations by specialty radiologists at a pediatric hospital: rate of disagreement and clinical implications.
Eakins C; Ellis WD; Pruthi S; Johnson DP; Hernanz-Schulman M; Yu C; Kan JH
AJR Am J Roentgenol; 2012 Oct; 199(4):916-20. PubMed ID: 22997387
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
4. Preliminary radiology resident interpretations versus final attending radiologist interpretations and the impact on patient care in a community hospital.
Ruchman RB; Jaeger J; Wiggins EF; Seinfeld S; Thakral V; Bolla S; Wallach S
AJR Am J Roentgenol; 2007 Sep; 189(3):523-6. PubMed ID: 17715095
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
5. Body MRI Subspecialty Reinterpretations at a Tertiary Care Center: Discrepancy Rates and Error Types.
Kostrubiak DE; DeHay PW; Ali N; D'Agostino R; Keating DP; Tam JK; Akselrod DG
AJR Am J Roentgenol; 2020 Dec; 215(6):1384-1388. PubMed ID: 33052740
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
6. Radiologic head CT interpretation errors in pediatric abusive and non-abusive head trauma patients.
Kralik SF; Finke W; Wu IC; Hibbard RA; Hicks RA; Ho CY
Pediatr Radiol; 2017 Jul; 47(8):942-951. PubMed ID: 28497263
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
7. Quality and Value of Subspecialty Reinterpretation of Thoracic CT Scans of Patients Referred to a Tertiary Cancer Center.
Carter BW; Erasmus JJ; Truong MT; Shepard JO; Hofstetter W; Clarke R; Munden RF; Steele JR
J Am Coll Radiol; 2017 Aug; 14(8):1109-1118. PubMed ID: 28434844
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
8. CT in adults: systematic review and meta-analysis of interpretation discrepancy rates.
Wu MZ; McInnes MD; Macdonald DB; Kielar AZ; Duigenan S
Radiology; 2014 Mar; 270(3):717-35. PubMed ID: 24475832
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
9. Overnight resident interpretation of torso CT at a level 1 trauma center an analysis and review of the literature.
Chung JH; Strigel RM; Chew AR; Albrecht E; Gunn ML
Acad Radiol; 2009 Sep; 16(9):1155-60. PubMed ID: 19481962
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
10. Preliminary interpretations of after-hours CT and sonography by radiology residents versus final interpretations by body imaging radiologists at a level 1 trauma center.
Carney E; Kempf J; DeCarvalho V; Yudd A; Nosher J
AJR Am J Roentgenol; 2003 Aug; 181(2):367-73. PubMed ID: 12876012
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
11. Clinical importance of second-opinion interpretations of abdominal imaging studies in a cancer hospital and its impact on patient management.
Virarkar M; Jensen C; Klekers A; Wagner-Bartak NA; Devine CE; Lano EA; Sun J; Tharakeswara B; Bhosale P
Clin Imaging; 2022 Jun; 86():13-19. PubMed ID: 35313164
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
12. Second-opinion interpretations of neuroimaging studies by oncologic neuroradiologists can help reduce errors in cancer care.
Hatzoglou V; Omuro AM; Haque S; Khakoo Y; Ganly I; Oh JH; Shukla-Dave A; Fatovic R; Gaal J; Holodny AI
Cancer; 2016 Sep; 122(17):2708-14. PubMed ID: 27219108
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
13. Musculoskeletal Outside Interpretation (MOI-RADS): an automated quality assurance tool to prospectively track discrepancies in second-opinion interpretations in musculoskeletal imaging.
Bedoya MA; Chi AS; Harsha AK; Oh SC; Cook TS
Skeletal Radiol; 2021 Apr; 50(4):723-730. PubMed ID: 32968823
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
14. Identifying benchmarks for discrepancy rates in preliminary interpretations provided by radiology trainees at an academic institution.
Ruutiainen AT; Scanlon MH; Itri JN
J Am Coll Radiol; 2011 Sep; 8(9):644-8. PubMed ID: 21889753
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
15. On-Call Radiology Resident Discrepancies: Categorization by Patient Location and Severity.
Mellnick V; Raptis C; McWilliams S; Picus D; Wahl R
J Am Coll Radiol; 2016 Oct; 13(10):1233-1238. PubMed ID: 27319372
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
16. Recommendations for additional imaging of abdominal imaging examinations: frequency, benefit, and cost.
Heinz SA; Kwee TC; Yakar D
Eur Radiol; 2020 Feb; 30(2):1137-1144. PubMed ID: 31451972
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
17. The discrepancy rate between preliminary and official reports of emergency radiology studies: a performance indicator and quality improvement method.
Issa G; Taslakian B; Itani M; Hitti E; Batley N; Saliba M; El-Merhi F
Acta Radiol; 2015 May; 56(5):598-604. PubMed ID: 24833644
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
18. JOURNAL CLUB: Hepatopancreaticobiliary Imaging Second-Opinion Consultations: Is There Value in the Second Reading?
Shetty AS; Mittal A; Salter A; Narra VR; Fowler KJ
AJR Am J Roentgenol; 2018 Dec; 211(6):1264-1272. PubMed ID: 30247982
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
19. Cross-sectional examination interpretation discrepancies between on-call diagnostic radiology residents and subspecialty faculty radiologists: analysis by imaging modality and subspecialty.
Ruma J; Klein KA; Chong S; Wesolowski J; Kazerooni EA; Ellis JH; Myles JD
J Am Coll Radiol; 2011 Jun; 8(6):409-14. PubMed ID: 21636055
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
20. Second-Opinion Interpretations of Gynecologic Oncologic MRI Examinations by Sub-Specialized Radiologists Influence Patient Care.
Lakhman Y; D'Anastasi M; Miccò M; Scelzo C; Vargas HA; Nougaret S; Sosa RE; Chi DS; Abu-Rustum NR; Hricak H; Sala E
Eur Radiol; 2016 Jul; 26(7):2089-98. PubMed ID: 26494640
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
[Next] [New Search]
