410 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 30032092)
1. An economical and efficient method for postmortem DNA sampling in mass fatalities.
Mundorff AZ; Amory S; Huel R; Bilić A; Scott AL; Parsons TJ
Forensic Sci Int Genet; 2018 Sep; 36():167-175. PubMed ID: 30032092
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
2. In-field collection and preservation of decomposing human tissues to facilitate rapid purification and STR typing.
Holmes AS; Roman MG; Hughes-Stamm S
Forensic Sci Int Genet; 2018 Sep; 36():124-129. PubMed ID: 29990824
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
3. DNA quality and quantity from up to 16 years old post-mortem blood stored on FTA cards.
Rahikainen AL; Palo JU; de Leeuw W; Budowle B; Sajantila A
Forensic Sci Int; 2016 Apr; 261():148-53. PubMed ID: 26937857
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
4. The importance of forensic storage support: DNA quality from 11-year-old saliva on FTA cards.
Corradini B; Alù M; Magnanini E; Galinier ME; Silingardi E
Int J Legal Med; 2019 Nov; 133(6):1743-1750. PubMed ID: 31463575
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
5. The use of FTA cards to acquire DNA profiles from postmortem cases.
Green H; Tillmar A; Pettersson G; Montelius K
Int J Legal Med; 2019 Nov; 133(6):1651-1657. PubMed ID: 30747256
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
6. Increased recovery of touch DNA evidence using FTA paper compared to conventional collection methods.
Kirgiz IA; Calloway C
J Forensic Leg Med; 2017 Apr; 47():9-15. PubMed ID: 28171796
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
7. Comparing different post-mortem human samples as DNA sources for downstream genotyping and identification.
Calacal GC; Apaga DLT; Salvador JM; Jimenez JAD; Lagat LJ; Villacorta RPF; Lim MCF; Fortun RDR; Datar FA; De Ungria MCA
Forensic Sci Int Genet; 2015 Nov; 19():212-220. PubMed ID: 26275611
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
8. Impact of sample degradation and inhibition on field-based DNA identification of human remains.
Dawnay N; Flamson R; Hall MJR; Steadman DW
Forensic Sci Int Genet; 2018 Nov; 37():46-53. PubMed ID: 30077890
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
9. Quantifiler® Trio Kit and forensic samples management: a matter of degradation.
Vernarecci S; Ottaviani E; Agostino A; Mei E; Calandro L; Montagna P
Forensic Sci Int Genet; 2015 May; 16():77-85. PubMed ID: 25544252
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
10. High-throughput sequencing of forensic genetic samples using punches of FTA cards with buccal swabs.
Kampmann ML; Buchard A; Børsting C; Morling N
Biotechniques; 2016; 61(3):149-51. PubMed ID: 27625209
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
11. Identification of human remains using Rapid DNA analysis.
Turingan RS; Brown J; Kaplun L; Smith J; Watson J; Boyd DA; Steadman DW; Selden RF
Int J Legal Med; 2020 May; 134(3):863-872. PubMed ID: 31781850
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
12. Reduction of Powerplex(®) Y23 reaction volume for genotyping buccal cell samples on FTA(TM) cards.
Raziel A; Dell'Ariccia-Carmon A; Zamir A
J Forensic Sci; 2015 Jan; 60(1):152-6. PubMed ID: 25381718
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
13. Forensic genetic analysis of bone remain samples.
Siriboonpiputtana T; Rinthachai T; Shotivaranon J; Peonim V; Rerkamnuaychoke B
Forensic Sci Int; 2018 Mar; 284():167-175. PubMed ID: 29408726
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
14. [The evaluation of stability of blood stains immobilized on the FHA cards during their prolonged storage].
Kornienko IV; Faleeva TG; Bachurin SS; Gudkov DA; Guruleva EA; Ivanov PL
Sud Med Ekspert; 2014; 57(4):28-30. PubMed ID: 25764861
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
15. Simplified Direct PCR Method for Reference Buccal Samples Using a Non-FTA Card by Omitting the Pretreatment Step.
Jung JY; Ryu GH; Kim DH; Kim JY; Hwang IK; Kang PW; Chun BW; Yoo SY
J Forensic Sci; 2020 Jan; 65(1):209-213. PubMed ID: 31433497
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
16. [Forensic application of expressmarker 22 STR loci direct PCR amplification kit].
Zou KN; Cao Y; Xia ZF; Zheng WG; Zhou HG
Fa Yi Xue Za Zhi; 2012 Dec; 28(6):448-50. PubMed ID: 23484329
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
17. Suitability of specific soft tissue swabs for the forensic identification of highly decomposed bodies.
Helm K; Matzenauer C; Neuhuber F; Monticelli F; Meyer H; Pittner S; Gotsmy W
Int J Legal Med; 2021 Jul; 135(4):1319-1327. PubMed ID: 33880634
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
18. Preservation and rapid purification of DNA from decomposing human tissue samples.
Sorensen A; Rahman E; Canela C; Gangitano D; Hughes-Stamm S
Forensic Sci Int Genet; 2016 Nov; 25():182-190. PubMed ID: 27631894
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
19. Effects of storage conditions on forensic examinations of blood samples and bloodstains stored for 20 years.
Hara M; Nakanishi H; Yoneyama K; Saito K; Takada A
Leg Med (Tokyo); 2016 Jan; 18():81-4. PubMed ID: 26832383
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
20. Prediction of autosomal STR typing success in ancient and Second World War bone samples.
Zupanič Pajnič I; Zupanc T; Balažic J; Geršak ŽM; Stojković O; Skadrić I; Črešnar M
Forensic Sci Int Genet; 2017 Mar; 27():17-26. PubMed ID: 27907810
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
[Next] [New Search]
