These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.
128 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 30032766)
1. Noninvasive detection of changes in cells' cytosol conductivity by combining dielectrophoresis with optical tweezers. Moisescu MG; Savopol T; Dimitriu L; Cemazar J; Kovacs E; Radu M Anal Chim Acta; 2018 Nov; 1030():166-171. PubMed ID: 30032766 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
2. Changes of cell electrical parameters induced by electroporation. A dielectrophoresis study. Moisescu MG; Radu M; Kovacs E; Mir LM; Savopol T Biochim Biophys Acta; 2013 Feb; 1828(2):365-72. PubMed ID: 23000110 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
3. Feasibility study for cell electroporation detection and separation by means of dielectrophoresis. Oblak J; Krizaj D; Amon S; Macek-Lebar A; Miklavcic D Bioelectrochemistry; 2007 Nov; 71(2):164-71. PubMed ID: 17509948 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
4. Measurement of the real part of the Clausius-Mossotti factor of dielectrophoresis for Brownian particles. Lo YJ; Lei U Electrophoresis; 2020 Jan; 41(1-2):137-147. PubMed ID: 31661554 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
5. On the low-frequency dispersion observed in dielectrophoresis spectra. Hughes MP; Clarke KSP; Hoque R; Griffiths OV; Kruchek EJ; Bertagna F; Jeevaratnam K; Lewis R; Labeed FH Electrophoresis; 2024 Jun; 45(11-12):1080-1087. PubMed ID: 38193244 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
6. Quantitative measurements of absolute dielectrophoretic forces using optical tweezers. Hong Y; Pyo JW; Baek SH; Lee SW; Yoon DS; No K; Kim BM Opt Lett; 2010 Jul; 35(14):2493-5. PubMed ID: 20634874 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
7. Limitations of the Clausius-Mossotti function used in dielectrophoresis and electrical impedance studies of biomacromolecules. Pethig R Electrophoresis; 2019 Sep; 40(18-19):2575-2583. PubMed ID: 30861572 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
8. Characterization of biomechanical properties of cells through dielectrophoresis-based cell stretching and actin cytoskeleton modeling. Bai G; Li Y; Chu HK; Wang K; Tan Q; Xiong J; Sun D Biomed Eng Online; 2017 Apr; 16(1):41. PubMed ID: 28376803 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
9. Protein dielectrophoresis: Key dielectric parameters and evolving theory. Hölzel R; Pethig R Electrophoresis; 2021 Mar; 42(5):513-538. PubMed ID: 33084076 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
10. Frequency-Modulated Wave Dielectrophoresis of Vesicles And Cells: Periodic U-Turns at the Crossover Frequency. Frusawa H Nanoscale Res Lett; 2018 Jun; 13(1):169. PubMed ID: 29881976 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
11. Analysis of the role of the particle-wall interaction on the separation efficiencies of field flow fractionation dielectrophoretic devices. Camarda M; Scalese S; La Magna A Electrophoresis; 2015 Jul; 36(13):1396-404. PubMed ID: 25487144 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
12. How medium osmolarity influences dielectrophoretically assisted on-chip electrofusion. Hamdi FS; Français O; Dufour-Gergam E; Le Pioufle B Bioelectrochemistry; 2014 Dec; 100():27-35. PubMed ID: 25012938 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
13. Intracellular potassium under osmotic stress determines the dielectrophoresis cross-over frequency of murine myeloma cells in the MHz range. Chung C; Pethig R; Smith S; Waterfall M Electrophoresis; 2018 Apr; 39(7):989-997. PubMed ID: 29274244 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
14. Direct measurements of the frequency-dependent dielectrophoresis force. Wei MT; Junio J; Ou-Yang HD Biomicrofluidics; 2009 Jan; 3(1):12003. PubMed ID: 19693384 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
15. Size and medium conductivity dependence on dielectrophoretic behaviors of gas core poly-L-lysine shell nanoparticles. Yang C; Wu CJ; Ostafin AE; Thibaudeau G; Minerick AR Electrophoresis; 2015 Apr; 36(7-8):1002-10. PubMed ID: 25640705 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
16. Dielectric model for Chinese hamster ovary cells obtained by dielectrophoresis cytometry. Salimi E; Braasch K; Butler M; Thomson DJ; Bridges GE Biomicrofluidics; 2016 Jan; 10(1):014111. PubMed ID: 26858823 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
17. Recent advances in dielectrophoresis-based cell viability assessment. Zhang J; Song Z; Liu Q; Song Y Electrophoresis; 2020 Jun; 41(10-11):917-932. PubMed ID: 31808164 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
19. Optical tweezers integrated surface plasmon resonance holographic microscopy for characterizing cell-substrate interactions under noninvasive optical force stimuli. Dai S; Mi J; Dou J; Lu H; Dong C; Ren L; Zhao R; Shi W; Zhang N; Zhou Y; Zhang J; Di J; Zhao J Biosens Bioelectron; 2022 Jun; 206():114131. PubMed ID: 35255316 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
20. Effect of solution conductivity and electrode shape on the deposition of carbon nanotubes from solution using dielectrophoresis. Naieni AK; Nojeh A Nanotechnology; 2012 Dec; 23(49):495606. PubMed ID: 23165429 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related] [Next] [New Search]