These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.
2. An Ivor Lewis Esophagectomy Designed to Minimize Anastomotic Complications and Optimize Conduit Function. Ramchandani NK; Kesler KA; Rogers JD; Valsangkar N; Stokes SM; Jalal SI J Vis Exp; 2020 Apr; (158):. PubMed ID: 32364542 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
3. A change in clinical practice: a partially stapled cervical esophagogastric anastomosis reduces morbidity and improves functional outcome after esophagectomy for cancer. Kondra J; Ong SR; Clifton J; Evans K; Finley RJ; Yee J Dis Esophagus; 2008; 21(5):422-9. PubMed ID: 19125796 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
4. Anastomotic leak and stricture after hand-sewn versus linear-stapled intrathoracic oesophagogastric anastomosis: single-centre analysis of 415 oesophagectomies. Harustiak T; Pazdro A; Snajdauf M; Stolz A; Lischke R Eur J Cardiothorac Surg; 2016 Jun; 49(6):1650-9. PubMed ID: 26574497 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
5. A comprehensive review of anastomotic technique in 432 esophagectomies. Price TN; Nichols FC; Harmsen WS; Allen MS; Cassivi SD; Wigle DA; Shen KR; Deschamps C Ann Thorac Surg; 2013 Apr; 95(4):1154-60; discussion 1160-1. PubMed ID: 23395626 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
6. End-to-side circular stapled versus side-to-side linear stapled intrathoracic esophagogastric anastomosis following minimally invasive Ivor-Lewis esophagectomy: comparison of short-term outcomes. Fabbi M; van Berge Henegouwen MI; Fumagalli Romario U; Gandini S; Feenstra M; De Pascale S; Gisbertz SS Langenbecks Arch Surg; 2022 Nov; 407(7):2681-2692. PubMed ID: 35639136 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
7. Embedded Three-Layer Esophagogastric Anastomosis Reduces Morbidity and Improves Short-Term Outcomes After Esophagectomy for Cancer. Sun HB; Li Y; Liu XB; Zhang RX; Wang ZF; Zheng Y; Qin JJ; Li HM; Chen XK; Wu Z Ann Thorac Surg; 2016 Mar; 101(3):1131-8. PubMed ID: 26687140 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
8. Comparison of Outcomes with Semi-mechanical and Circular Stapled Intrathoracic Esophagogastric Anastomosis following Esophagectomy. Yanni F; Singh P; Tewari N; Parsons SL; Catton JA; Duffy J; Welch NT; Vohra RS World J Surg; 2019 Oct; 43(10):2483-2489. PubMed ID: 31222637 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
9. Simple Technique of Circular Stapled Anastomosis in Ivor Lewis Esophagectomy. Singhal S; Kailasam A; Akimoto S; Masuda T; Bertellotti C; Mittal SK J Laparoendosc Adv Surg Tech A; 2017 Mar; 27(3):288-294. PubMed ID: 27705608 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
10. Triangulating stapling vs functional end-to-end stapling for cervical esophagogastric anastomosis after esophagectomy for thoracic esophageal cancer: study protocol for a randomized controlled trial. Tsuji T; Ojima T; Nakamori M; Nakamura M; Katsuda M; Hayata K; Kitadani J; Maruoka S; Shimokawa T; Yamaue H Trials; 2019 Jan; 20(1):83. PubMed ID: 30691515 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
11. 21- versus 25-mm Circular Staplers for Cervical Anastomosis: A Propensity-Matched Study. Wang J; Yao F; Yao J; Xu L; Qian JL; Shan LM J Surg Res; 2020 Feb; 246():427-434. PubMed ID: 31699537 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
12. Omental reinforcement of the thoracic esophagogastric anastomosis: an analysis of leak and reintervention rates in patients undergoing planned and salvage esophagectomy. Sepesi B; Swisher SG; Walsh GL; Correa A; Mehran RJ; Rice D; Roth J; Vaporciyan A; Hofstetter WL J Thorac Cardiovasc Surg; 2012 Nov; 144(5):1146-50. PubMed ID: 22939861 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
13. Comparison of end-to-side hand-sewn and side-to-side stapled cervical esophagogastric anastomosis in patients with lower thoracic esophageal cancer undergoing transhiatal esophagectomy: an Iranian retrospective cohort study. Rasihashemi SZ; Ramouz A; Beheshtirouy S; Amini H BMC Gastroenterol; 2020 Jul; 20(1):250. PubMed ID: 32736599 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
14. A safe and reproducible anastomotic technique for minimally invasive Ivor Lewis oesophagectomy: the circular-stapled anastomosis with the trans-oral anvil. Campos GM; Jablons D; Brown LM; Ramirez RM; Rabl C; Theodore P Eur J Cardiothorac Surg; 2010 Jun; 37(6):1421-6. PubMed ID: 20153660 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
16. Minimally Invasive Ivor Lewis Esophagectomy with Linear Stapled Anastomosis Associated with Low Leak and Stricture Rates. Kukar M; Ben-David K; Peng JS; Attwood K; Thomas RM; Hennon M; Nwogu C; Hochwald SN J Gastrointest Surg; 2020 Aug; 24(8):1729-1735. PubMed ID: 31317458 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
17. Robotic Side-to-Side and End-to-Side Stapled Esophagogastric Anastomosis of Ivor Lewis Esophagectomy for Cancer. Zhang H; Wang Z; Zheng Y; Geng Y; Wang F; Chen LQ; Wang Y World J Surg; 2019 Dec; 43(12):3074-3082. PubMed ID: 31538252 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
18. Anastomotic leaks after esophagectomy for esophageal cancer: a comparison of thoracic and cervical anastomoses. Blewett CJ; Miller JD; Young JE; Bennett WF; Urschel JD Ann Thorac Cardiovasc Surg; 2001 Apr; 7(2):75-8. PubMed ID: 11371275 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
19. Technique of minimally invasive Ivor Lewis esophagogastrectomy with intrathoracic stapled side-to-side anastomosis. Ben-David K; Sarosi GA; Cendan JC; Hochwald SN J Gastrointest Surg; 2010 Oct; 14(10):1613-8. PubMed ID: 20532663 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
20. A pilot randomized controlled trial on the utility of gastric conditioning in the prevention of esophagogastric anastomotic leak after Ivor Lewis esophagectomy. The APIL_2013 Trial. Mils K; MirĂ³ M; Farran L; Videla S; Alba E; Estremiana F; Bettonica C; Aranda H Int J Surg; 2022 Oct; 106():106921. PubMed ID: 36116675 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related] [Next] [New Search]