These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

210 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 30034024)

  • 1. Thou Shalt Not Bear False Witness Against Null Hypothesis Significance Testing.
    García-Pérez MA
    Educ Psychol Meas; 2017 Aug; 77(4):631-662. PubMed ID: 30034024
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. Bayesian alternatives to null hypothesis significance testing in biomedical research: a non-technical introduction to Bayesian inference with JASP.
    Kelter R
    BMC Med Res Methodol; 2020 Jun; 20(1):142. PubMed ID: 32503439
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. Neuroscience Needs to Test Both Statistical and Scientific Hypotheses.
    Alger BE
    J Neurosci; 2022 Nov; 42(45):8432-8438. PubMed ID: 36351823
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. Moving Beyond p < 0.05 in Ecotoxicology: A Guide for Practitioners.
    Erickson RA; Rattner BA
    Environ Toxicol Chem; 2020 Sep; 39(9):1657-1669. PubMed ID: 32539165
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. Bayesian alternatives for common null-hypothesis significance tests in psychiatry: a non-technical guide using JASP.
    Quintana DS; Williams DR
    BMC Psychiatry; 2018 Jun; 18(1):178. PubMed ID: 29879931
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. The continuing misuse of null hypothesis significance testing in biological anthropology.
    Smith RJ
    Am J Phys Anthropol; 2018 May; 166(1):236-245. PubMed ID: 29345299
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. Bayesian inference of population prevalence.
    Ince RA; Paton AT; Kay JW; Schyns PG
    Elife; 2021 Oct; 10():. PubMed ID: 34612811
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. Evaluating statistical difference, equivalence, and indeterminacy using inferential confidence intervals: an integrated alternative method of conducting null hypothesis statistical tests.
    Tryon WW
    Psychol Methods; 2001 Dec; 6(4):371-86. PubMed ID: 11778678
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. Current controversies: Null hypothesis significance testing.
    Sedgwick PM; Hammer A; Kesmodel US; Pedersen LH
    Acta Obstet Gynecol Scand; 2022 Jun; 101(6):624-627. PubMed ID: 35451497
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. Statistical inference in abstracts of major medical and epidemiology journals 1975-2014: a systematic review.
    Stang A; Deckert M; Poole C; Rothman KJ
    Eur J Epidemiol; 2017 Jan; 32(1):21-29. PubMed ID: 27858205
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. A review of issues about null hypothesis Bayesian testing.
    Tendeiro JN; Kiers HAL
    Psychol Methods; 2019 Dec; 24(6):774-795. PubMed ID: 31094544
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. fbst: An R package for the Full Bayesian Significance Test for testing a sharp null hypothesis against its alternative via the e value.
    Kelter R
    Behav Res Methods; 2022 Jun; 54(3):1114-1130. PubMed ID: 34471963
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. A logical analysis of null hypothesis significance testing using popular terminology.
    McNulty R
    BMC Med Res Methodol; 2022 Sep; 22(1):244. PubMed ID: 36123631
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. Alternatives to P value: confidence interval and effect size.
    Lee DK
    Korean J Anesthesiol; 2016 Dec; 69(6):555-562. PubMed ID: 27924194
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. Why we habitually engage in null-hypothesis significance testing: A qualitative study.
    Stunt J; van Grootel L; Bouter L; Trafimow D; Hoekstra T; de Boer M
    PLoS One; 2021; 16(10):e0258330. PubMed ID: 34653185
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. Null regions: a unified conceptual framework for statistical inference.
    Smiley AH; Glazier JJ; Shoda Y
    R Soc Open Sci; 2023 Nov; 10(11):221328. PubMed ID: 38026040
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. Bayesian analysis for nurse and midwifery research: statistical, practical and ethical benefits.
    Malone HE; Coyne I
    Nurse Res; 2023 Jan; ():. PubMed ID: 36655468
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. Moving college health research forward: Reconsidering our reliance on statistical significance testing.
    Barry AE; Valdez D; Goodson P; Szucs L; Reyes JV
    J Am Coll Health; 2019 Apr; 67(3):181-188. PubMed ID: 29952723
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. Reverse-Bayes methods for evidence assessment and research synthesis.
    Held L; Matthews R; Ott M; Pawel S
    Res Synth Methods; 2022 May; 13(3):295-314. PubMed ID: 34889058
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. False-positive and false-negative risks for individual multicentre trials in critical care.
    Sidebotham D; Barlow CJ
    BJA Open; 2022 Mar; 1():100003. PubMed ID: 37588693
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 11.