162 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 30035152)
1. Reproducing two-dimensional mammograms with three-dimensional printed phantoms.
Badal A; Clark M; Ghammraoui B
J Med Imaging (Bellingham); 2018 Jul; 5(3):033501. PubMed ID: 30035152
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
2. Breast phantoms for 2D digital mammography with realistic anatomical structures and attenuation characteristics based on clinical images using 3D printing.
Schopphoven S; Cavael P; Bock K; Fiebich M; Mäder U
Phys Med Biol; 2019 Oct; 64(21):215005. PubMed ID: 31469105
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
3. Fabrication of 3D printed patient-derived anthropomorphic breast phantoms for mammography and digital breast tomosynthesis: Imaging assessment with clinical X-ray spectra.
Varallo A; Sarno A; Castriconi R; Mazzilli A; Loria A; Del Vecchio A; Orientale A; Pilotti IAM; D'Andria P; Bliznakova K; Ricciardi R; Mettivier G; Russo P
Phys Med; 2022 Jun; 98():88-97. PubMed ID: 35526373
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
4. The advent of anthropomorphic three-dimensional breast phantoms for X-ray imaging.
Bliznakova K
Phys Med; 2020 Nov; 79():145-161. PubMed ID: 33321469
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
5. A novel physical anthropomorphic breast phantom for 2D and 3D x-ray imaging.
Ikejimba LC; Graff CG; Rosenthal S; Badal A; Ghammraoui B; Lo JY; Glick SJ
Med Phys; 2017 Feb; 44(2):407-416. PubMed ID: 27992059
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
6. Development of realistic physical breast phantoms matched to virtual breast phantoms based on human subject data.
Kiarashi N; Nolte AC; Sturgeon GM; Segars WP; Ghate SV; Nolte LW; Samei E; Lo JY
Med Phys; 2015 Jul; 42(7):4116-26. PubMed ID: 26133612
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
7. Recent advances on the development of phantoms using 3D printing for imaging with CT, MRI, PET, SPECT, and ultrasound.
Filippou V; Tsoumpas C
Med Phys; 2018 Jun; 45(9):e740-60. PubMed ID: 29933508
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
8. A four-alternative forced choice (4AFC) methodology for evaluating microcalcification detection in clinical full-field digital mammography (FFDM) and digital breast tomosynthesis (DBT) systems using an inkjet-printed anthropomorphic phantom.
Ikejimba LC; Salad J; Graff CG; Ghammraoui B; Cheng WC; Lo JY; Glick SJ
Med Phys; 2019 Sep; 46(9):3883-3892. PubMed ID: 31135960
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
9. A novel method for producing x-ray test objects and phantoms.
Theodorakou C; Horrocks JA; Marshall NW; Speller RD
Phys Med Biol; 2004 Apr; 49(8):1423-38. PubMed ID: 15152683
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
10. Development of a neonate X-ray phantom for 2D imaging applications using single-tone inkjet printing.
Cruz-Bastida JP; Marshall EL; Reiser N; George J; Pearson EA; Feinstein KA; Al-Hallaq HA; Burton CS; Beaulieu D; MacDougall RD; Reiser I
Med Phys; 2021 Sep; 48(9):4944-4954. PubMed ID: 34255871
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
11. Attenuation coefficient in the energy range 14-36 keV of 3D printing materials for physical breast phantoms.
Mettivier G; Sarno A; Varallo A; Russo P
Phys Med Biol; 2022 Sep; 67(17):. PubMed ID: 35961302
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
12. Suitability of low density materials for 3D printing of physical breast phantoms.
Ivanov D; Bliznakova K; Buliev I; Popov P; Mettivier G; Russo P; Di Lillo F; Sarno A; Vignero J; Bosmans H; Bravin A; Bliznakov Z
Phys Med Biol; 2018 Sep; 63(17):175020. PubMed ID: 29999497
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
13. Comparative power law analysis of structured breast phantom and patient images in digital mammography and breast tomosynthesis.
Cockmartin L; Bosmans H; Marshall NW
Med Phys; 2013 Aug; 40(8):081920. PubMed ID: 23927334
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
14. Realistic 3D printed CT imaging tumor phantoms for validation of image processing algorithms.
Hatamikia S; Gulyas I; Birkfellner W; Kronreif G; Unger A; Oberoi G; Lorenz A; Unger E; Kettenbach J; Figl M; Patsch J; Strassl A; Georg D; Renner A
Phys Med; 2023 Jan; 105():102512. PubMed ID: 36584415
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
15. Investigation of the effects of spinal surgical implants on radiotherapy dosimetry: A study of 3D printed phantoms.
Goodall SK; Rampant P; Smith W; Waterhouse D; Rowshanfarzad P; Ebert MA
Med Phys; 2021 Aug; 48(8):4586-4597. PubMed ID: 34214205
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
16. Technical note: Controlling the attenuation of 3D-printed physical phantoms for computed tomography with a single material.
Tong H; Pegues H; Samei E; Lo JY; Wiley BJ
Med Phys; 2022 Apr; 49(4):2582-2589. PubMed ID: 35191035
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
17. Technical Note: Characterization of custom 3D printed multimodality imaging phantoms.
Bieniosek MF; Lee BJ; Levin CS
Med Phys; 2015 Oct; 42(10):5913-8. PubMed ID: 26429265
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
18. Evaluation of a breast software model for 2D and 3D X-ray imaging studies of the breast.
Baneva Y; Bliznakova K; Cockmartin L; Marinov S; Buliev I; Mettivier G; Bosmans H; Russo P; Marshall N; Bliznakov Z
Phys Med; 2017 Sep; 41():78-86. PubMed ID: 28483356
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
19. Impact of compressed breast thickness and dose on lesion detectability in digital mammography: FROC study with simulated lesions in real mammograms.
Salvagnini E; Bosmans H; Van Ongeval C; Van Steen A; Michielsen K; Cockmartin L; Struelens L; Marshall NW
Med Phys; 2016 Sep; 43(9):5104. PubMed ID: 27587041
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
20. Fabrication of microcalcifications for insertion into phantoms used to evaluate x-ray breast imaging systems.
Ghammraoui B; Zidan A; Alayoubi A; Zidan A; Glick SJ
Biomed Phys Eng Express; 2021 Aug; 7(5):. PubMed ID: 34375962
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
[Next] [New Search]
