These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

158 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 30035152)

  • 21. Paper-based 3D printing of anthropomorphic CT phantoms: Feasibility of two construction techniques.
    Jahnke P; Schwarz S; Ziegert M; Schwarz FB; Hamm B; Scheel M
    Eur Radiol; 2019 Mar; 29(3):1384-1390. PubMed ID: 30116957
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 22. Imaging properties of 3D printed breast phantoms for lesion localization and Core needle biopsy training.
    Ali A; Wahab R; Huynh J; Wake N; Mahoney M
    3D Print Med; 2020 Feb; 6(1):4. PubMed ID: 32072305
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 23. X-ray properties of an anthropomorphic breast phantom for MRI and x-ray imaging.
    Freed M; Badal A; Jennings RJ; de las Heras H; Myers KJ; Badano A
    Phys Med Biol; 2011 Jun; 56(12):3513-33. PubMed ID: 21606556
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 24. Monte Carlo performance on the x-ray converter thickness in digital mammography using software breast models.
    Liaparinos P; Bliznakova K
    Med Phys; 2012 Nov; 39(11):6638-51. PubMed ID: 23127058
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 25. Finite-element modeling of compression and gravity on a population of breast phantoms for multimodality imaging simulation.
    Sturgeon GM; Kiarashi N; Lo JY; Samei E; Segars WP
    Med Phys; 2016 May; 43(5):2207. PubMed ID: 27147333
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 26. The production of digital and printed resources from multiple modalities using visualization and three-dimensional printing techniques.
    Shui W; Zhou M; Chen S; Pan Z; Deng Q; Yao Y; Pan H; He T; Wang X
    Int J Comput Assist Radiol Surg; 2017 Jan; 12(1):13-23. PubMed ID: 27480284
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 27. Quantification and normalization of x-ray mammograms.
    Tromans CE; Cocker MR; Brady SM
    Phys Med Biol; 2012 Oct; 57(20):6519-40. PubMed ID: 23010610
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 28. Towards 3D printed multifunctional immobilization for proton therapy: Initial materials characterization.
    Michiels S; D'Hollander A; Lammens N; Kersemans M; Zhang G; Denis JM; Poels K; Sterpin E; Nuyts S; Haustermans K; Depuydt T
    Med Phys; 2016 Oct; 43(10):5392. PubMed ID: 27782703
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 29. Comparison of full-field digital mammography to screen-film mammography with respect to contrast and spatial resolution in tissue equivalent breast phantoms.
    Kuzmiak CM; Pisano ED; Cole EB; Zeng D; Burns CB; Roberto C; Pavic D; Lee Y; Seo BK; Koomen M; Washburn D
    Med Phys; 2005 Oct; 32(10):3144-50. PubMed ID: 16279068
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 30. Assessment of the attenuation of metal-infused filaments for 3D printing a gamma camera calibration phantom.
    Beckmann J; Popovic K
    Med Eng Phys; 2020 Jun; 80():60-64. PubMed ID: 32446758
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 31. Characterization of office laser printers for 3-D printing of soft tissue CT phantoms.
    Gerbl A; Lewin M; Zeiske T; Ziegert M; Schwarz FB; Hamm B; Scheel M; Jahnke P
    J Med Imaging (Bellingham); 2019 Apr; 6(2):021602. PubMed ID: 30820442
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 32. Accurate estimation of compressed breast thickness in mammography.
    Mawdsley GE; Tyson AH; Peressotti CL; Jong RA; Yaffe MJ
    Med Phys; 2009 Feb; 36(2):577-86. PubMed ID: 19291997
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 33. Evaluation of the quantitative accuracy of a commercially available positron emission mammography scanner.
    Springer A; Mawlawi OR
    Med Phys; 2011 Apr; 38(4):2132-9. PubMed ID: 21626946
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 34. Effects on image quality of a 2D antiscatter grid in x-ray digital breast tomosynthesis: Initial experience using the dual modality (x-ray and molecular) breast tomosynthesis scanner.
    Patel T; Peppard H; Williams MB
    Med Phys; 2016 Apr; 43(4):1720. PubMed ID: 27036570
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 35. 3-D-Printed Phantom Fabricated by Photopolymer Jetting Technology for High-Frequency Ultrasound Imaging.
    Jacquet JR; Ossant F; Levassort F; Gregoire JM
    IEEE Trans Ultrason Ferroelectr Freq Control; 2018 Jun; 65(6):1048-1055. PubMed ID: 29856722
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 36. Population of 224 realistic human subject-based computational breast phantoms.
    Erickson DW; Wells JR; Sturgeon GM; Samei E; Dobbins JT; Segars WP; Lo JY
    Med Phys; 2016 Jan; 43(1):23. PubMed ID: 26745896
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 37. Investigation of the refractive index decrement of 3D printing materials for manufacturing breast phantoms for phase contrast imaging.
    Esposito G; Mettivier G; Bliznakova K; Bliznakov Z; Bosmans H; Bravin A; Buliev I; Di Lillo F; Ivanov D; Minutillo M; Sarno A; Vignero J; Russo P
    Phys Med Biol; 2019 Mar; 64(7):075008. PubMed ID: 30754030
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 38. Comparison of low-contrast detectability between two CT reconstruction algorithms using voxel-based 3D printed textured phantoms.
    Solomon J; Ba A; Bochud F; Samei E
    Med Phys; 2016 Dec; 43(12):6497. PubMed ID: 27908164
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 39. Effective radiation attenuation calibration for breast density: compression thickness influences and correction.
    Heine JJ; Cao K; Thomas JA
    Biomed Eng Online; 2010 Nov; 9():73. PubMed ID: 21080916
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 40.
    ; ; . PubMed ID:
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

    [Previous]   [Next]    [New Search]
    of 8.