These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

146 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 30035152)

  • 41. Investigation of the refractive index decrement of 3D printing materials for manufacturing breast phantoms for phase contrast imaging.
    Esposito G; Mettivier G; Bliznakova K; Bliznakov Z; Bosmans H; Bravin A; Buliev I; Di Lillo F; Ivanov D; Minutillo M; Sarno A; Vignero J; Russo P
    Phys Med Biol; 2019 Mar; 64(7):075008. PubMed ID: 30754030
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 42. Comparison of low-contrast detectability between two CT reconstruction algorithms using voxel-based 3D printed textured phantoms.
    Solomon J; Ba A; Bochud F; Samei E
    Med Phys; 2016 Dec; 43(12):6497. PubMed ID: 27908164
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 43. Effective radiation attenuation calibration for breast density: compression thickness influences and correction.
    Heine JJ; Cao K; Thomas JA
    Biomed Eng Online; 2010 Nov; 9():73. PubMed ID: 21080916
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 44. Fatty and fibroglandular tissue volumes in the breasts of women 20-83 years old: comparison of X-ray mammography and computer-assisted MR imaging.
    Lee NA; Rusinek H; Weinreb J; Chandra R; Toth H; Singer C; Newstead G
    AJR Am J Roentgenol; 1997 Feb; 168(2):501-6. PubMed ID: 9016235
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 45. A calibration approach to glandular tissue composition estimation in digital mammography.
    Kaufhold J; Thomas JA; Eberhard JW; Galbo CE; Trotter DE
    Med Phys; 2002 Aug; 29(8):1867-80. PubMed ID: 12201434
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 46. Three-dimensional printing of MRI-visible phantoms and MR image-guided therapy simulation.
    Mitsouras D; Lee TC; Liacouras P; Ionita CN; Pietilla T; Maier SE; Mulkern RV
    Magn Reson Med; 2017 Feb; 77(2):613-622. PubMed ID: 26864335
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 47. Quantification of Al-equivalent thickness of just visible microcalcifications in full field digital mammograms.
    Carton AK; Bosmans H; Vandenbroucke D; Souverijns G; Van Ongeval C; Dragusin O; Marchal G
    Med Phys; 2004 Jul; 31(7):2165-76. PubMed ID: 15305471
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 48. Getting started with protocol for quality assurance of digital mammography in the clinical centre of Montenegro.
    Ivanovic S; Bosmans H; Mijovic S
    Radiat Prot Dosimetry; 2015 Jul; 165(1-4):363-8. PubMed ID: 25862535
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 49. Comparison of diagnostic accuracy of breast masses using digitized images versus screen-film mammography.
    Liang Z; Du X; Liu J; Yao X; Yang Y; Li K
    Acta Radiol; 2008 Jul; 49(6):618-22. PubMed ID: 18568552
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 50. Radiopaque Three-dimensional Printing: A Method to Create Realistic CT Phantoms.
    Jahnke P; Limberg FR; Gerbl A; Ardila Pardo GL; Braun VP; Hamm B; Scheel M
    Radiology; 2017 Feb; 282(2):569-575. PubMed ID: 27626676
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 51. Technical challenges in generalizing calibration techniques for breast density measurements.
    Fowler EEE; Smallwood AM; Khan NZ; Kilpatrick K; Sellers TA; Heine J
    Med Phys; 2019 Feb; 46(2):679-688. PubMed ID: 30525207
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 52. Design and validation of realistic breast models for use in multiple alternative forced choice virtual clinical trials.
    Elangovan P; Mackenzie A; Dance DR; Young KC; Cooke V; Wilkinson L; Given-Wilson RM; Wallis MG; Wells K
    Phys Med Biol; 2017 Apr; 62(7):2778-2794. PubMed ID: 28291738
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 53. Characterization of 3D printing techniques: Toward patient specific quality assurance spine-shaped phantom for stereotactic body radiation therapy.
    Kim MJ; Lee SR; Lee MY; Sohn JW; Yun HG; Choi JY; Jeon SW; Suh TS
    PLoS One; 2017; 12(5):e0176227. PubMed ID: 28472175
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 54. Method for simulating dose reduction in digital mammography using the Anscombe transformation.
    Borges LR; Oliveira HCR; Nunes PF; Bakic PR; Maidment ADA; Vieira MAC
    Med Phys; 2016 Jun; 43(6):2704-2714. PubMed ID: 27277017
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 55. Design and characterization of a 3D-printed axon-mimetic phantom for diffusion MRI.
    Mushtaha FN; Kuehn TK; El-Deeb O; Rohani SA; Helpard LW; Moore J; Ladak H; Moehring A; Baron CA; Khan AR
    Magn Reson Med; 2021 Nov; 86(5):2482-2496. PubMed ID: 34196049
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 56. Low dose high energy x-ray in-line phase sensitive imaging prototype: Investigation of optimal geometric conditions and design parameters.
    Ghani MU; Yan A; Wong MD; Li Y; Ren L; Wu X; Liu H
    J Xray Sci Technol; 2015; 23(6):667-82. PubMed ID: 26756405
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 57. The Future of Biomechanical Spine Research: Conception and Design of a Dynamic 3D Printed Cervical Myelography Phantom.
    Clifton W; Nottmeier E; Damon A; Dove C; Pichelmann M
    Cureus; 2019 May; 11(5):e4591. PubMed ID: 31309016
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 58. Large breast compressions: observations and evaluation of simulations.
    Tanner C; White M; Guarino S; Hall-Craggs MA; Douek M; Hawkes DJ
    Med Phys; 2011 Feb; 38(2):682-90. PubMed ID: 21452705
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 59. Development of multi-purpose 3D printed phantoms for MRI.
    Rai R; Wang YF; Manton D; Dong B; Deshpande S; Liney GP
    Phys Med Biol; 2019 Mar; 64(7):075010. PubMed ID: 30818301
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 60.
    ; ; . PubMed ID:
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

    [Previous]   [Next]    [New Search]
    of 8.