These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

155 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 30035551)

  • 1. Fillers can help control for contextual bias in forensic comparison tasks.
    Quigley-McBride A; Wells GL
    Law Hum Behav; 2018 Aug; 42(4):295-305. PubMed ID: 30035551
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. The perfect match: Do criminal stereotypes bias forensic evidence analysis?
    Smalarz L; Madon S; Yang Y; Guyll M; Buck S
    Law Hum Behav; 2016 Aug; 40(4):420-9. PubMed ID: 27149288
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. The single lineup paradigm: A new way to manipulate target presence in eyewitness identification experiments.
    Oriet C; Fitzgerald RJ
    Law Hum Behav; 2018 Feb; 42(1):1-12. PubMed ID: 29461076
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. New signal detection theory-based framework for eyewitness performance in lineups.
    Lee J; Penrod SD
    Law Hum Behav; 2019 Oct; 43(5):436-454. PubMed ID: 31368723
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. The effects of cognitive bias, examiner expertise, and stimulus material on forensic evidence analysis.
    Pena MM; Stoiloff S; Sparacino M; Schreiber Compo N
    J Forensic Sci; 2024 Sep; 69(5):1740-1757. PubMed ID: 38922874
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. Do inconclusive forensic decisions disadvantage the innocent?
    Madon S; Burd KA; Guyll M
    Law Hum Behav; 2024 Feb; 48(1):33-49. PubMed ID: 38573703
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. Why are lineups better than showups? A test of the filler siphoning and enhanced discriminability accounts.
    Colloff MF; Wixted JT
    J Exp Psychol Appl; 2020 Mar; 26(1):124-143. PubMed ID: 30883151
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. The impact of eyewitness identifications from simultaneous and sequential lineups.
    Wright DB
    Memory; 2007 Oct; 15(7):746-54. PubMed ID: 17852725
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. Estimation of eyewitness error rates in fair and biased lineups.
    Fitzgerald RJ; Tredoux CG; Juncu S
    Law Hum Behav; 2023 Aug; 47(4):463-483. PubMed ID: 37471013
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. Double-blind photo lineups using actual eyewitnesses: an experimental test of a sequential versus simultaneous lineup procedure.
    Wells GL; Steblay NK; Dysart JE
    Law Hum Behav; 2015 Feb; 39(1):1-14. PubMed ID: 24933175
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. The impact of fillers on lineup performance.
    Wetmore SA; McAdoo RM; Gronlund SD; Neuschatz JS
    Cogn Res Princ Implic; 2017; 2(1):48. PubMed ID: 29214209
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. Guilty by his fibers: suspect confession versus textile fibers reconstructed simulation.
    Suzuki S; Higashikawa Y; Sugita R; Suzuki Y
    Forensic Sci Int; 2009 Aug; 189(1-3):e27-32. PubMed ID: 19411148
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. The Relationship Between Eyewitness Confidence and Identification Accuracy: A New Synthesis.
    Wixted JT; Wells GL
    Psychol Sci Public Interest; 2017 May; 18(1):10-65. PubMed ID: 28395650
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. Does filler database size influence identification accuracy?
    Bergold AN; Heaton P
    Law Hum Behav; 2018 Jun; 42(3):227-243. PubMed ID: 29809026
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. The impact of proficiency testing information and error aversions on the weight given to fingerprint evidence.
    Mitchell G; Garrett BL
    Behav Sci Law; 2019 Mar; 37(2):195-210. PubMed ID: 30883891
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. Do evidence submission forms expose latent print examiners to task-irrelevant information?
    Gardner BO; Kelley S; Murrie DC; Blaisdell KN
    Forensic Sci Int; 2019 Apr; 297():236-242. PubMed ID: 30875663
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. Accuracy and reliability of forensic latent fingerprint decisions.
    Ulery BT; Hicklin RA; Buscaglia J; Roberts MA
    Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A; 2011 May; 108(19):7733-8. PubMed ID: 21518906
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. Cognitive and contextual influences in determination of latent fingerprint suitability for identification judgments.
    Fraser-Mackenzie PA; Dror IE; Wertheim K
    Sci Justice; 2013 Jun; 53(2):144-53. PubMed ID: 23601721
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. On the advantages of using AI-generated images of filler faces for creating fair lineups.
    Bell R; Menne NM; Mayer C; Buchner A
    Sci Rep; 2024 May; 14(1):12304. PubMed ID: 38811714
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. The evidential strength of a combination of corresponding class features in tire examination.
    Sjerps M; Alberink I; Visser R; Stoel RD
    Forensic Sci Int; 2022 Aug; 337():111351. PubMed ID: 35709588
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 8.