These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

187 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 30035558)

  • 1. Actual vs. perceived eyewitness accuracy and confidence and the featural justification effect.
    Dobolyi DG; Dodson CS
    J Exp Psychol Appl; 2018 Dec; 24(4):543-563. PubMed ID: 30035558
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. Misinterpreting eyewitness expressions of confidence: The featural justification effect.
    Dodson CS; Dobolyi DG
    Law Hum Behav; 2015 Jun; 39(3):266-80. PubMed ID: 25602181
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. Improving the interpretation of verbal eyewitness confidence statements by distinguishing perceptions of certainty from those of accuracy.
    Grabman JH; Cash DK; Slane CR; Dodson CS
    J Exp Psychol Appl; 2022 Sep; 28(3):589-605. PubMed ID: 34081495
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. Witnessing-condition information differentially affects evaluations of high- and moderate-confidence eyewitness identifications.
    Lebensfeld TC; Smalarz L
    Cognition; 2024 Sep; 250():105841. PubMed ID: 38852371
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. The Relationship Between Eyewitness Confidence and Identification Accuracy: A New Synthesis.
    Wixted JT; Wells GL
    Psychol Sci Public Interest; 2017 May; 18(1):10-65. PubMed ID: 28395650
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. Pre-identification confidence is related to eyewitness lineup identification accuracy across heterogeneous encoding conditions.
    Molinaro PF; Charman SD; Wylie K
    Law Hum Behav; 2021 Dec; 45(6):524-541. PubMed ID: 34661424
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. Eyewitness confidence and decision time reflect identification accuracy in actual police lineups.
    Quigley-McBride A; Wells GL
    Law Hum Behav; 2023 Apr; 47(2):333-347. PubMed ID: 36757968
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. The language of accurate and inaccurate eyewitnesses.
    Seale-Carlisle TM; Grabman JH; Dodson CS
    J Exp Psychol Gen; 2022 Jun; 151(6):1283-1305. PubMed ID: 34855444
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. The single lineup paradigm: A new way to manipulate target presence in eyewitness identification experiments.
    Oriet C; Fitzgerald RJ
    Law Hum Behav; 2018 Feb; 42(1):1-12. PubMed ID: 29461076
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. Eyewitness confidence malleability: Misinformation as post-identification feedback.
    Greenspan RL; Loftus EF
    Law Hum Behav; 2020 Jun; 44(3):194-208. PubMed ID: 32378911
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. A signal-detection analysis of eyewitness identification across the adult lifespan.
    Colloff MF; Wade KA; Wixted JT; Maylor EA
    Psychol Aging; 2017 May; 32(3):243-258. PubMed ID: 28504536
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. Do masked-face lineups facilitate eyewitness identification of a masked individual?
    Manley KD; Chan JCK; Wells GL
    J Exp Psychol Appl; 2019 Sep; 25(3):396-409. PubMed ID: 30556719
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. New signal detection theory-based framework for eyewitness performance in lineups.
    Lee J; Penrod SD
    Law Hum Behav; 2019 Oct; 43(5):436-454. PubMed ID: 31368723
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. Initial eyewitness confidence reliably predicts eyewitness identification accuracy.
    Wixted JT; Mickes L; Clark SE; Gronlund SD; Roediger HL
    Am Psychol; 2015 Sep; 70(6):515-26. PubMed ID: 26348334
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. Using machine learning analyses to explore relations between eyewitness lineup looking behaviors and suspect guilt.
    Price HL; Bruer KC; Adkins MC
    Law Hum Behav; 2020 Jun; 44(3):223-237. PubMed ID: 32105097
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. Are multiple-trial experiments appropriate for eyewitness identification studies? Accuracy, choosing, and confidence across trials.
    Mansour JK; Beaudry JL; Lindsay RCL
    Behav Res Methods; 2017 Dec; 49(6):2235-2254. PubMed ID: 28432569
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. Context influences interpretation of eyewitness confidence statements.
    Cash DK; Lane SM
    Law Hum Behav; 2017 Apr; 41(2):180-190. PubMed ID: 27598562
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. The distance threshold of reliable eyewitness identification.
    Nyman TJ; Lampinen JM; Antfolk J; Korkman J; Santtila P
    Law Hum Behav; 2019 Dec; 43(6):527-541. PubMed ID: 31294577
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. The emotional eyewitness: the effects of emotion on specific aspects of eyewitness recall and recognition performance.
    Houston KA; Clifford BR; Phillips LH; Memon A
    Emotion; 2013 Feb; 13(1):118-28. PubMed ID: 22775133
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. The damaging effect of confirming feedback on the relation between eyewitness certainty and identification accuracy.
    Bradfield AL; Wells GL; Olson EA
    J Appl Psychol; 2002 Feb; 87(1):112-20. PubMed ID: 11916205
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 10.