428 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 30035689)
1. Should the Glidescope video laryngoscope be used first line for all oral intubations or only in those with a difficult airway? A review of current literature.
Russell TM; Hormis A;
J Perioper Pract; 2018 Dec; 28(12):322-333. PubMed ID: 30035689
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
2. Management of the predicted difficult airway: a comparison of conventional blade laryngoscopy with video-assisted blade laryngoscopy and the GlideScope.
Serocki G; Bein B; Scholz J; Dörges V
Eur J Anaesthesiol; 2010 Jan; 27(1):24-30. PubMed ID: 19809328
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
3. Assessment of the storz video Macintosh laryngoscope for use in difficult airways: A human simulator study.
Bair AE; Olmsted K; Brown CA; Barker T; Pallin D; Walls RM
Acad Emerg Med; 2010 Oct; 17(10):1134-7. PubMed ID: 21064263
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
4. A comparison of the video laryngoscopes with Macintosh laryngoscope for nasotracheal intubation.
Tseng KY; Lu IC; Shen YC; Lin CH; Chen PN; Cheng KI
Asian J Anesthesiol; 2017 Mar; 55(1):17-21. PubMed ID: 28846537
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
5. Evaluation of ease of intubation with the GlideScope or Macintosh laryngoscope by anaesthetists in simulated easy and difficult laryngoscopy.
Lim TJ; Lim Y; Liu EH
Anaesthesia; 2005 Feb; 60(2):180-3. PubMed ID: 15644017
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
6. Glidescope® video-laryngoscopy versus direct laryngoscopy for endotracheal intubation: a systematic review and meta-analysis.
Griesdale DE; Liu D; McKinney J; Choi PT
Can J Anaesth; 2012 Jan; 59(1):41-52. PubMed ID: 22042705
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
7. Comparison of the McGrath® Series 5 and GlideScope® Ranger with the Macintosh laryngoscope by paramedics.
Piepho T; Weinert K; Heid FM; Werner C; Noppens RR
Scand J Trauma Resusc Emerg Med; 2011 Jan; 19(1):4. PubMed ID: 21241469
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
8. Routine clinical practice effectiveness of the Glidescope in difficult airway management: an analysis of 2,004 Glidescope intubations, complications, and failures from two institutions.
Aziz MF; Healy D; Kheterpal S; Fu RF; Dillman D; Brambrink AM
Anesthesiology; 2011 Jan; 114(1):34-41. PubMed ID: 21150569
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
9. Airway Management in Disaster Response: A Manikin Study Comparing Direct and Video Laryngoscopy for Endotracheal Intubation by Prehospital Providers in Level C Personal Protective Equipment.
Yousif S; Machan JT; Alaska Y; Suner S
Prehosp Disaster Med; 2017 Aug; 32(4):352-356. PubMed ID: 28318455
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
10. A comparison of the Truview PCD and the GlideScope Cobalt AVL video-laryngoscopes to the Miller blade for successfully intubating manikins simulating normal and difficult pediatric airways.
Hippard HK; Kalyani G; Olutoye OA; Mann DG; Watcha MF
Paediatr Anaesth; 2016 Jun; 26(6):613-20. PubMed ID: 27083381
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
11. A comparison of the GlideScope video laryngoscope to the C-MAC video laryngoscope for intubation in the emergency department.
Mosier J; Chiu S; Patanwala AE; Sakles JC
Ann Emerg Med; 2013 Apr; 61(4):414-420.e1. PubMed ID: 23374414
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
12. Comparison of the C-MAC videolaryngoscope with the Macintosh, Glidescope, and Airtraq laryngoscopes in easy and difficult laryngoscopy scenarios in manikins.
McElwain J; Malik MA; Harte BH; Flynn NM; Laffey JG
Anaesthesia; 2010 May; 65(5):483-9. PubMed ID: 20337620
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
13. An evaluation of the GlideScope, a new video laryngoscope for difficult airways: a manikin study.
Benjamin FJ; Boon D; French RA
Eur J Anaesthesiol; 2006 Jun; 23(6):517-21. PubMed ID: 16672094
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
14. First-Attempt Intubation Success of Video Laryngoscopy in Patients with Anticipated Difficult Direct Laryngoscopy: A Multicenter Randomized Controlled Trial Comparing the C-MAC D-Blade Versus the GlideScope in a Mixed Provider and Diverse Patient Population.
Aziz MF; Abrons RO; Cattano D; Bayman EO; Swanson DE; Hagberg CA; Todd MM; Brambrink AM
Anesth Analg; 2016 Mar; 122(3):740-750. PubMed ID: 26579847
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
15. Comparison of three video laryngoscopes and direct laryngoscopy for emergency endotracheal intubation: a retrospective cohort study.
Suzuki K; Kusunoki S; Tanigawa K; Shime N
BMJ Open; 2019 Mar; 9(3):e024927. PubMed ID: 30928937
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
16. A mannequin study of intubation with the AP advance and GlideScope Ranger videolaryngoscopes and the Macintosh laryngoscope.
Hodd JA; Doyle DJ; Gupta S; Dalton JE; Cata JP; Brewer EJ; James M; Sessler DI
Anesth Analg; 2011 Oct; 113(4):791-800. PubMed ID: 21890882
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
17. Comparison of GlideScope video laryngoscopy and Macintosh laryngoscope in ear-nose and throat surgery.
Misirlioglu G; Sen O
Ir J Med Sci; 2016 Aug; 185(3):729-733. PubMed ID: 26732694
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
18. A comparison between the GlideScope Video Laryngoscope and direct laryngoscope in paediatric patients with difficult airways - a pilot study.
Armstrong J; John J; Karsli C
Anaesthesia; 2010 Apr; 65(4):353-7. PubMed ID: 20402873
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
19. Comparison of the GlideScope® videolaryngoscope and the Macintosh laryngoscope for double-lumen tube intubation.
Hsu HT; Chou SH; Wu PJ; Tseng KY; Kuo YW; Chou CY; Cheng KI
Anaesthesia; 2012 Apr; 67(4):411-5. PubMed ID: 22324297
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
20. GlideScope Use improves intubation success rates: an observational study using propensity score matching.
Ibinson JW; Ezaru CS; Cormican DS; Mangione MP
BMC Anesthesiol; 2014; 14():101. PubMed ID: 25400507
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
[Next] [New Search]
