These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

133 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 30036210)

  • 21. Addendum to the article: Misuse of null hypothesis significance testing: Would estimation of positive and negative predictive values improve certainty of chemical risk assessment?
    Bundschuh M; Newman MC; Zubrod JP; Seitz F; Rosenfeldt RR; Schulz R
    Environ Sci Pollut Res Int; 2015 Mar; 22(5):3955-7. PubMed ID: 25354437
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 22. 'Likelihood-ratio' and 'odds' applied to monitoring of patients as a supplement to 'reference change value' (RCV).
    Petersen PH; Sandberg S; Iglesias N; Sölétormos G; Aarsand AK; Brandslund I; Jørgensen LG
    Clin Chem Lab Med; 2008; 46(2):157-64. PubMed ID: 18076354
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 23. Bayes factor and posterior probability: Complementary statistical evidence to p-value.
    Lin R; Yin G
    Contemp Clin Trials; 2015 Sep; 44():33-35. PubMed ID: 26212520
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 24. Making sense of odds and odds ratios.
    Grimes DA; Schulz KF
    Obstet Gynecol; 2008 Feb; 111(2 Pt 1):423-6. PubMed ID: 18238982
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 25. The continuing misuse of null hypothesis significance testing in biological anthropology.
    Smith RJ
    Am J Phys Anthropol; 2018 May; 166(1):236-245. PubMed ID: 29345299
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 26. Confidence with confidence intervals.
    Thomas R; Braganza A; Oommen LM; Muliyil J
    Indian J Ophthalmol; 1997 Jun; 45(2):119-23. PubMed ID: 9475032
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 27. [Clinical significance vs statistical significance. How to interpret the confidence interval at 95].
    Martínez-Ezquerro JD; Riojas-Garza A; Rendón-Macías ME
    Rev Alerg Mex; 2017; 64(4):477-486. PubMed ID: 29249109
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 28. Confidence intervals and p-values in clinical decision making.
    Akobeng AK
    Acta Paediatr; 2008 Aug; 97(8):1004-7. PubMed ID: 18462462
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 29. [The uncertainties of statistical "significance"].
    Domenech RJ
    Rev Med Chil; 2018 Dec; 146(10):1184-1189. PubMed ID: 30724983
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 30. Clinical significance not statistical significance: a simple Bayesian alternative to p values.
    Burton PR; Gurrin LC; Campbell MJ
    J Epidemiol Community Health; 1998 May; 52(5):318-23. PubMed ID: 9764283
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 31. Maximum (Max) and Mid-P confidence intervals and p values for the standardized mortality and incidence ratios.
    Kulkarni PM; Tripathi RC; Michalek JE
    Am J Epidemiol; 1998 Jan; 147(1):83-6. PubMed ID: 9440403
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 32. Misconceptions, Misuses, and Misinterpretations of P Values and Significance Testing.
    Gagnier JJ; Morgenstern H
    J Bone Joint Surg Am; 2017 Sep; 99(18):1598-1603. PubMed ID: 28926390
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 33. The behavior of the P-value when the alternative hypothesis is true.
    Hung HM; O'Neill RT; Bauer P; Köhne K
    Biometrics; 1997 Mar; 53(1):11-22. PubMed ID: 9147587
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 34. What is the chance that this study is clinically significant? A proposal for Q values.
    Froehlich GW
    Eff Clin Pract; 1999; 2(5):234-9. PubMed ID: 10623056
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 35. Statistical methods in epidemiology: I. Statistical errors in hypothesis testing.
    Rigby AS
    Disabil Rehabil; 1998 Apr; 20(4):121-6. PubMed ID: 9571378
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 36. Statistical inference by confidence intervals: issues of interpretation and utilization.
    Sim J; Reid N
    Phys Ther; 1999 Feb; 79(2):186-95. PubMed ID: 10029058
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 37. Non-inferiority trials: the 'at least as good as' criterion.
    Laster LL; Johnson MF
    Stat Med; 2003 Jan; 22(2):187-200. PubMed ID: 12520556
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 38. What is confidence? Part 1: The use and interpretation of confidence intervals.
    Young KD; Lewis RJ
    Ann Emerg Med; 1997 Sep; 30(3):307-10. PubMed ID: 9287892
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 39. [P value and confidence intervals: reporting and interpreting the result of a clinical study].
    Ravani P; Andrulli S
    G Ital Nefrol; 2006; 23(5):490-501. PubMed ID: 17123262
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 40. [Roaming through methodology: XXIX. P].
    Sonke GS; Rovers MM
    Ned Tijdschr Geneeskd; 2001 Jan; 145(2):74-7. PubMed ID: 11225260
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Previous]   [Next]    [New Search]
    of 7.