BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

298 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 30036716)

  • 1. Effect of Sagittal Spinal Balance on the Outcome of Decompression Surgery for Lumbar Canal Stenosis.
    Chang HS
    World Neurosurg; 2018 Nov; 119():e200-e208. PubMed ID: 30036716
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. Factors associated with improvement in sagittal spinal alignment after microendoscopic laminotomy in patients with lumbar spinal canal stenosis.
    Dohzono S; Toyoda H; Takahashi S; Matsumoto T; Suzuki A; Terai H; Nakamura H
    J Neurosurg Spine; 2016 Jul; 25(1):39-45. PubMed ID: 26967988
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. Impact of sagittal spinopelvic alignment on clinical outcomes after decompression surgery for lumbar spinal canal stenosis without coronal imbalance.
    Hikata T; Watanabe K; Fujita N; Iwanami A; Hosogane N; Ishii K; Nakamura M; Toyama Y; Matsumoto M
    J Neurosurg Spine; 2015 Oct; 23(4):451-8. PubMed ID: 26140404
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. Influence of postoperative sagittal balance and spinopelvic parameters on the outcome of patients surgically treated for degenerative lumbar spondylolisthesis.
    Radovanovic I; Urquhart JC; Ganapathy V; Siddiqi F; Gurr KR; Bailey SI; Bailey CS
    J Neurosurg Spine; 2017 Apr; 26(4):448-453. PubMed ID: 28106523
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. [Impact of sagittal balance parameters on life quality in elderly and senile patients after surgery for degenerative lumbar spine stenosis].
    Klimov VS; Vasilenko II; Evsyukov AV; Amelina EV
    Zh Vopr Neirokhir Im N N Burdenko; 2017; 81(2):56-66. PubMed ID: 28524126
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. The sagittal spinal profile type: a principal precondition for surgical decision making in patients with lumbar spinal stenosis.
    Bayerl SH; Pöhlmann F; Finger T; Franke J; Woitzik J; Vajkoczy P
    J Neurosurg Spine; 2017 Nov; 27(5):552-559. PubMed ID: 28862573
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. Radiological improvements in global sagittal alignment after lumbar decompression without fusion.
    Fujii K; Kawamura N; Ikegami M; Niitsuma G; Kunogi J
    Spine (Phila Pa 1976); 2015 May; 40(10):703-9. PubMed ID: 25394314
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. The influence of preoperative spinal sagittal balance on clinical outcomes after microendoscopic laminotomy in patients with lumbar spinal canal stenosis.
    Dohzono S; Toyoda H; Matsumoto T; Suzuki A; Terai H; Nakamura H
    J Neurosurg Spine; 2015 Jul; 23(1):49-54. PubMed ID: 25840041
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. How do spinopelvic parameters influence patient-reported outcome measurements after lumbar decompression?
    Divi SN; Goyal DKC; Bowles DR; Mujica VE; Guzek R; Kaye ID; Kurd MF; Woods BI; Radcliff KE; Rihn JA; Anderson DG; Hilibrand AS; Kepler CK; Vaccaro AR; Schroeder GD
    Spine J; 2020 Oct; 20(10):1610-1617. PubMed ID: 32445807
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. The impact of age on surgical goals for spinopelvic alignment in minimally invasive surgery for adult spinal deformity.
    Park P; Fu KM; Mummaneni PV; Uribe JS; Wang MY; Tran S; Kanter AS; Nunley PD; Okonkwo DO; Shaffrey CI; Mundis GM; Chou D; Eastlack R; Anand N; Than KD; Zavatsky JM; Fessler RG;
    J Neurosurg Spine; 2018 Nov; 29(5):560-564. PubMed ID: 30095383
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. Influence of Lumbar Lordosis on the Outcome of Decompression Surgery for Lumbar Canal Stenosis.
    Chang HS
    World Neurosurg; 2018 Jan; 109():e684-e690. PubMed ID: 29061449
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. Should patients with lumbar stenosis and grade I spondylolisthesis be treated differently based on spinopelvic alignment? A retrospective, two-year, propensity matched, comparison of patient-reported outcome measures and clinical outcomes from multiple sites within a single health system.
    Mohanty S; Barchick S; Kadiyala M; Lad M; Rouhi AD; Vadali C; Albayar A; Ozturk AK; Khalsa A; Saifi C; Casper DS
    Spine J; 2023 Jan; 23(1):92-104. PubMed ID: 36064091
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. Long-Term Changes in Sagittal Balance After Microsurgical Decompression of Lumbar Spinal Canal Stenosis in Elderly Patients: A Follow-Up Study for 5-Years After Surgery.
    Yokoyama K; Ikeda N; Tanaka H; Ito Y; Sugie A; Yamada M; Wanibuchi M; Kawanishi M
    World Neurosurg; 2023 Aug; 176():e384-e390. PubMed ID: 37236312
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. Effects of the difference between lumbar lordosis in the supine and standing positions on the clinical outcomes of decompression surgery for lumbar spinal stenosis.
    Nakano S; Inoue M; Takahashi H; Kubota G; Saito J; Norimoto M; Koyama K; Watanabe A; Nakajima T; Sato Y; Ohyama S; Orita S; Eguchi Y; Inage K; Shiga Y; Sonobe M; Nakajima A; Ohtori S; Nakagawa K; Aoki Y
    J Neurosurg Spine; 2022 Apr; 36(4):542-548. PubMed ID: 34715669
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. Short Lumbosacral Decompression Plus Fixation Does Not Change the Spinopelvic Balance on Patients With Moderate Degenerative Spondylolisthesis and Associated Spinal Stenosis.
    Korovessis P; Syrimpeis V; Tsekouras V
    Spine Deform; 2019 Mar; 7(2):346-355. PubMed ID: 30660232
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. Outcome after less-invasive decompression of lumbar spinal stenosis: a randomized comparison of unilateral laminotomy, bilateral laminotomy, and laminectomy.
    Thomé C; Zevgaridis D; Leheta O; Bäzner H; Pöckler-Schöniger C; Wöhrle J; Schmiedek P
    J Neurosurg Spine; 2005 Aug; 3(2):129-41. PubMed ID: 16370302
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. Mid-term changes in spinopelvic sagittal alignment in lumbar spinal stenosis with coexisting degenerative spondylolisthesis or scoliosis after minimally invasive lumbar decompression surgery: minimum five-year follow-up.
    Salimi H; Toyoda H; Terai H; Yamada K; Hoshino M; Suzuki A; Takahashi S; Tamai K; Hori Y; Yabu A; Nakamura H
    Spine J; 2022 May; 22(5):819-826. PubMed ID: 34813957
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. Does sagittal imbalance impact the surgical outcomes of short-segment fusion for lumbar spinal stenosis associated with degenerative lumbar scoliosis?
    Hori Y; Matsumura A; Namikawa T; Kato M; Takahashi S; Ohyama S; Ozaki T; Yabu A; Nakamura H
    J Orthop Sci; 2019 Mar; 24(2):224-229. PubMed ID: 30391135
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. The Sagittal Balance Does not Influence the 1 Year Clinical Outcome of Patients With Lumbar Spinal Stenosis Without Obvious Instability After Microsurgical Decompression.
    Bayerl SH; Pöhlmann F; Finger T; Onken J; Franke J; Czabanka M; Woitzik J; Vajkoczy P
    Spine (Phila Pa 1976); 2015 Jul; 40(13):1014-21. PubMed ID: 25893354
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. The impact of spinopelvic morphology on the short-term outcome of pedicle subtraction osteotomy in 104 patients.
    Eskilsson K; Sharma D; Johansson C; Hedlund R
    J Neurosurg Spine; 2017 Jul; 27(1):74-80. PubMed ID: 28452632
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 15.