These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

204 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 30036747)

  • 1. Negative cues lead to more inefficient search than positive cues even at later stages of visual search.
    Kawashima T; Matsumoto E
    Acta Psychol (Amst); 2018 Oct; 190():85-94. PubMed ID: 30036747
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. The ignoring paradox: cueing distractor features leads first to selection, then to inhibition of to-be-ignored items.
    Moher J; Egeth HE
    Atten Percept Psychophys; 2012 Nov; 74(8):1590-605. PubMed ID: 22893004
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. Learned and cued distractor rejection for multiple features in visual search.
    Stilwell BT; Vecera SP
    Atten Percept Psychophys; 2019 Feb; 81(2):359-376. PubMed ID: 30421366
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. A feature-weighting account of priming in conjunction search.
    Becker SI; Horstmann G
    Atten Percept Psychophys; 2009 Feb; 71(2):258-72. PubMed ID: 19304616
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. Oscillatory Mechanisms of Preparing for Visual Distraction.
    de Vries IEJ; Savran E; van Driel J; Olivers CNL
    J Cogn Neurosci; 2019 Dec; 31(12):1873-1894. PubMed ID: 31418334
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. Explicit awareness supports conditional visual search in the retrieval guidance paradigm.
    Buttaccio DR; Lange ND; Hahn S; Thomas RP
    Acta Psychol (Amst); 2014 Jan; 145():44-53. PubMed ID: 24291120
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. Onset of background dynamic noise attenuates preview benefit in inefficient visual search.
    Osugi T; Murakami I
    Vision Res; 2015 Jul; 112():33-44. PubMed ID: 25976299
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. A search order lost effect: ignoring a singleton distractor affects visual search efficiency.
    Kumada T
    Vision Res; 2010 Jun; 50(14):1402-13. PubMed ID: 20025896
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. Dwelling on distractors varying in target-distractor similarity.
    Horstmann G; Ernst D; Becker S
    Acta Psychol (Amst); 2019 Jul; 198():102859. PubMed ID: 31212105
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. Selecting and ignoring salient objects within and across dimensions in visual search.
    Schubö A; Müller HJ
    Brain Res; 2009 Aug; 1283():84-101. PubMed ID: 19501066
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. Gaze in Visual Search Is Guided More Efficiently by Positive Cues than by Negative Cues.
    Kugler G; 't Hart BM; Kohlbecher S; Einhäuser W; Schneider E
    PLoS One; 2015; 10(12):e0145910. PubMed ID: 26717307
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. A salient and task-irrelevant collinear structure hurts visual search.
    Tseng CH; Jingling L
    PLoS One; 2015; 10(4):e0124190. PubMed ID: 25909986
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. Revising the link between microsaccades and the spatial cueing of voluntary attention.
    Meyberg S; Sinn P; Engbert R; Sommer W
    Vision Res; 2017 Apr; 133():47-60. PubMed ID: 28163059
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. Different effects of exogenous cues in a visual detection and discrimination task: delayed attention withdrawal and/or speeded motor inhibition?
    Van der Lubbe RH; Vogel RO; Postma A
    J Cogn Neurosci; 2005 Dec; 17(12):1829-40. PubMed ID: 16356322
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. Negative cues minimize visual search specificity effects.
    Phelps AM; Alexander RG; Schmidt J
    Vision Res; 2022 Jul; 196():108030. PubMed ID: 35313163
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. The target effect: visual memory for unnamed search targets.
    Thomas MD; Williams CC
    Q J Exp Psychol (Hove); 2014; 67(11):2090-104. PubMed ID: 24684498
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. Remembered but unused: the accessory items in working memory that do not guide attention.
    Peters JC; Goebel R; Roelfsema PR
    J Cogn Neurosci; 2009 Jun; 21(6):1081-91. PubMed ID: 18702589
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. Contextual cueing of pop-out visual search: when context guides the deployment of attention.
    Geyer T; Zehetleitner M; Müller HJ
    J Vis; 2010 May; 10(5):20. PubMed ID: 20616131
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. A singleton distractor updates the inhibitory template for visual marking.
    Yamauchi K; Kawahara JI
    Acta Psychol (Amst); 2019 Jan; 192():200-211. PubMed ID: 30530171
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. The search for oculomotor inhibition: interactions with working memory.
    Van der Stigchel S
    Exp Psychol; 2010; 57(6):429-35. PubMed ID: 20178939
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 11.