228 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 30039361)
1. Using SAAS-CNV to Detect and Characterize Somatic Copy Number Alterations in Cancer Genomes from Next Generation Sequencing and SNP Array Data.
Zhang Z; Hao K
Methods Mol Biol; 2018; 1833():29-47. PubMed ID: 30039361
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
2. SAAS-CNV: A Joint Segmentation Approach on Aggregated and Allele Specific Signals for the Identification of Somatic Copy Number Alterations with Next-Generation Sequencing Data.
Zhang Z; Hao K
PLoS Comput Biol; 2015 Nov; 11(11):e1004618. PubMed ID: 26583378
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
3. Comparative analysis of methods for identifying somatic copy number alterations from deep sequencing data.
Alkodsi A; Louhimo R; Hautaniemi S
Brief Bioinform; 2015 Mar; 16(2):242-54. PubMed ID: 24599115
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
4. An evaluation of copy number variation detection tools for cancer using whole exome sequencing data.
Zare F; Dow M; Monteleone N; Hosny A; Nabavi S
BMC Bioinformatics; 2017 May; 18(1):286. PubMed ID: 28569140
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
5. Evaluation of somatic copy number estimation tools for whole-exome sequencing data.
Nam JY; Kim NK; Kim SC; Joung JG; Xi R; Lee S; Park PJ; Park WY
Brief Bioinform; 2016 Mar; 17(2):185-92. PubMed ID: 26210357
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
6. Sequenza: allele-specific copy number and mutation profiles from tumor sequencing data.
Favero F; Joshi T; Marquard AM; Birkbak NJ; Krzystanek M; Li Q; Szallasi Z; Eklund AC
Ann Oncol; 2015 Jan; 26(1):64-70. PubMed ID: 25319062
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
7. Identification of Copy Number Alterations from Next-Generation Sequencing Data.
Nabavi S; Zare F
Adv Exp Med Biol; 2022; 1361():55-74. PubMed ID: 35230683
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
8. Copy number alterations detected by whole-exome and whole-genome sequencing of esophageal adenocarcinoma.
Wang X; Li X; Cheng Y; Sun X; Sun X; Self S; Kooperberg C; Dai JY
Hum Genomics; 2015 Sep; 9(1):22. PubMed ID: 26374103
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
9. Archived neonatal dried blood spot samples can be used for accurate whole genome and exome-targeted next-generation sequencing.
Hollegaard MV; Grauholm J; Nielsen R; Grove J; Mandrup S; Hougaard DM
Mol Genet Metab; 2013; 110(1-2):65-72. PubMed ID: 23830478
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
10. Cancer whole-genome sequencing: present and future.
Nakagawa H; Wardell CP; Furuta M; Taniguchi H; Fujimoto A
Oncogene; 2015 Dec; 34(49):5943-50. PubMed ID: 25823020
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
11. Combinatorial approach to estimate copy number genotype using whole-exome sequencing data.
Hwang MY; Moon S; Heo L; Kim YJ; Oh JH; Kim YJ; Kim YK; Lee J; Han BG; Kim BJ
Genomics; 2015 Mar; 105(3):145-9. PubMed ID: 25535679
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
12. CloneCNA: detecting subclonal somatic copy number alterations in heterogeneous tumor samples from whole-exome sequencing data.
Yu Z; Li A; Wang M
BMC Bioinformatics; 2016 Aug; 17():310. PubMed ID: 27538789
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
13. Combining targeted sequencing and ultra-low-pass whole-genome sequencing for accurate somatic copy number alteration detection.
Fu J; Guo W; Yan C; Lv Z; Wang Y; Wang Z; Fan Z; Lei T
Funct Integr Genomics; 2021 Mar; 21(2):161-169. PubMed ID: 33543400
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
14. An evaluation of copy number variation detection tools from whole-exome sequencing data.
Tan R; Wang Y; Kleinstein SE; Liu Y; Zhu X; Guo H; Jiang Q; Allen AS; Zhu M
Hum Mutat; 2014 Jul; 35(7):899-907. PubMed ID: 24599517
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
15. Gene-based comparative analysis of tools for estimating copy number alterations using whole-exome sequencing data.
Kim HY; Choi JW; Lee JY; Kong G
Oncotarget; 2017 Apr; 8(16):27277-27285. PubMed ID: 28460482
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
16. DEFOR: depth- and frequency-based somatic copy number alteration detector.
Zhang H; Zhan X; Brugarolas J; Xie Y
Bioinformatics; 2019 Oct; 35(19):3824-3825. PubMed ID: 30860569
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
17. Whole-genome sequencing is more powerful than whole-exome sequencing for detecting exome variants.
Belkadi A; Bolze A; Itan Y; Cobat A; Vincent QB; Antipenko A; Shang L; Boisson B; Casanova JL; Abel L
Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A; 2015 Apr; 112(17):5473-8. PubMed ID: 25827230
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
18. SynthEx: a synthetic-normal-based DNA sequencing tool for copy number alteration detection and tumor heterogeneity profiling.
Silva GO; Siegel MB; Mose LE; Parker JS; Sun W; Perou CM; Chen M
Genome Biol; 2017 Apr; 18(1):66. PubMed ID: 28390427
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
19. Tangent normalization for somatic copy-number inference in cancer genome analysis.
Gao GF; Oh C; Saksena G; Deng D; Westlake LC; Hill BA; Reich M; Schumacher SE; Berger AC; Carter SL; Cherniack AD; Meyerson M; Tabak B; Beroukhim R; Getz G
Bioinformatics; 2022 Oct; 38(20):4677-4686. PubMed ID: 36040167
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
20. Comprehensive performance comparison of high-resolution array platforms for genome-wide Copy Number Variation (CNV) analysis in humans.
Haraksingh RR; Abyzov A; Urban AE
BMC Genomics; 2017 Apr; 18(1):321. PubMed ID: 28438122
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
[Next] [New Search]
