164 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 30039385)
1. Low-risk prostate cancer selected for active surveillance with negative MRI at entry: can repeat biopsies at 1 year be avoided? A pilot study.
Olivier J; Kasivisvanathan V; Drumez E; Fantoni JC; Leroy X; Puech P; Villers A
World J Urol; 2019 Feb; 37(2):253-259. PubMed ID: 30039385
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
2. Prostate cancer screening using a combination of risk-prediction, MRI, and targeted prostate biopsies (STHLM3-MRI): a prospective, population-based, randomised, open-label, non-inferiority trial.
Nordström T; Discacciati A; Bergman M; Clements M; Aly M; Annerstedt M; Glaessgen A; Carlsson S; Jäderling F; Eklund M; Grönberg H;
Lancet Oncol; 2021 Sep; 22(9):1240-1249. PubMed ID: 34391509
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
3. Four-year outcomes from a multiparametric magnetic resonance imaging (MRI)-based active surveillance programme: PSA dynamics and serial MRI scans allow omission of protocol biopsies.
Gallagher KM; Christopher E; Cameron AJ; Little S; Innes A; Davis G; Keanie J; Bollina P; McNeill A
BJU Int; 2019 Mar; 123(3):429-438. PubMed ID: 30113755
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
4. Prostate-specific antigen (PSA) kinetics in untreated, localized prostate cancer: PSA velocity vs PSA doubling time.
Ng MK; Van As N; Thomas K; Woode-Amissah R; Horwich A; Huddart R; Khoo V; Thompson A; Dearnaley D; Parker C
BJU Int; 2009 Apr; 103(7):872-6. PubMed ID: 18990146
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
5. Comprehensive analysis of post-diagnostic prostate-specific antigen kinetics as predictor of a prostate cancer progression in active surveillance patients.
Iremashvili V; Manoharan M; Lokeshwar SD; Rosenberg DL; Pan D; Soloway MS
BJU Int; 2013 Mar; 111(3):396-403. PubMed ID: 22703025
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
6. Diffusion-weighted magnetic resonance imaging in prostate cancer patients on active surveillance one year after diagnosis and before repeat biopsy.
Vasarainen H; Lahdensuo K; Savolainen R; Ruutu M; Taari K; Rannikko A
Scand J Urol; 2013 Dec; 47(6):456-61. PubMed ID: 23327661
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
7. Risk-stratification based on magnetic resonance imaging and prostate-specific antigen density may reduce unnecessary follow-up biopsy procedures in men on active surveillance for low-risk prostate cancer.
Alberts AR; Roobol MJ; Drost FH; van Leenders GJ; Bokhorst LP; Bangma CH; Schoots IG
BJU Int; 2017 Oct; 120(4):511-519. PubMed ID: 28267899
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
8. Compliance Rates with the Prostate Cancer Research International Active Surveillance (PRIAS) Protocol and Disease Reclassification in Noncompliers.
Bokhorst LP; Alberts AR; Rannikko A; Valdagni R; Pickles T; Kakehi Y; Bangma CH; Roobol MJ;
Eur Urol; 2015 Nov; 68(5):814-21. PubMed ID: 26138043
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
9. Relationship between initial PSA density with future PSA kinetics and repeat biopsies in men with prostate cancer on active surveillance.
Kotb AF; Tanguay S; Luz MA; Kassouf W; Aprikian AG
Prostate Cancer Prostatic Dis; 2011 Mar; 14(1):53-7. PubMed ID: 20938463
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
10. Is It Time to Revisit the Role of Prostate-specific Antigen Kinetics in Active Surveillance for Prostate Cancer?
Iremashvili V; Kava BR; Manoharan M; Parekh DJ; Punnen S
Urology; 2016 Sep; 95():139-44. PubMed ID: 27130265
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
11. Role of Magnetic Resonance Imaging in Prostate Cancer Screening: A Pilot Study Within the Göteborg Randomised Screening Trial.
Grenabo Bergdahl A; Wilderäng U; Aus G; Carlsson S; Damber JE; Frånlund M; Geterud K; Khatami A; Socratous A; Stranne J; Hellström M; Hugosson J
Eur Urol; 2016 Oct; 70(4):566-573. PubMed ID: 26724840
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
12. A single-center long-term experience of active surveillance for prostate cancer: 15 years of follow-up.
Song SH; Kim JK; Lee H; Lee S; Hong SK; Byun SS
Investig Clin Urol; 2021 Jan; 62(1):32-38. PubMed ID: 33258324
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
13. Updated clinical results of active surveillance of very-low-risk prostate cancer in Korean men: 8 years of follow-up.
Ha JY; Shin TJ; Jung W; Kim BH; Park CH; Kim CI
Investig Clin Urol; 2017 May; 58(3):164-170. PubMed ID: 28480341
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
14. Value of Serial Multiparametric Magnetic Resonance Imaging and Magnetic Resonance Imaging-guided Biopsies in Men with Low-risk Prostate Cancer on Active Surveillance After 1 Yr Follow-up.
Hamoen EHJ; Hoeks CMA; Somford DM; van Oort IM; Vergunst H; Oddens JR; Smits GA; Bokhorst LP; Witjes JA; Rovers MM; Hulsbergen-van de Kaa CA; Barentsz JO
Eur Urol Focus; 2019 May; 5(3):407-415. PubMed ID: 29331622
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
15. A Decade of Active Surveillance in the PRIAS Study: An Update and Evaluation of the Criteria Used to Recommend a Switch to Active Treatment.
Bokhorst LP; Valdagni R; Rannikko A; Kakehi Y; Pickles T; Bangma CH; Roobol MJ;
Eur Urol; 2016 Dec; 70(6):954-960. PubMed ID: 27329565
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
16. Prostate-specific antigen doubling time as a progression criterion in an active surveillance programme for patients with localized prostate cancer.
Thomsen FB; Christensen IJ; Brasso K; Røder MA; Iversen P
BJU Int; 2014 May; 113(5b):E98-105. PubMed ID: 24053601
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
17. Active surveillance strategy for patients with localised prostate cancer: criteria for progression.
Thomsen FB
Dan Med J; 2015 Feb; 62(2):. PubMed ID: 25634510
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
18. PCASTt/SPCG-17-a randomised trial of active surveillance in prostate cancer: rationale and design.
Ahlberg MS; Adami HO; Beckmann K; Bertilsson H; Bratt O; Cahill D; Egevad L; Garmo H; Holmberg L; Johansson E; Rannikko A; Van Hemelrijck M; Jäderling F; Wassberg C; Åberg UWN; Bill-Axelson A
BMJ Open; 2019 Aug; 9(8):e027860. PubMed ID: 31444180
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
19. Diagnostic performance of MRI/TRUS fusion-guided biopsies vs. systematic prostate biopsies in biopsy-naïve, previous negative biopsy patients and men undergoing active surveillance.
Borghesi M; Bianchi L; Barbaresi U; Vagnoni V; Corcioni B; Gaudiano C; Fiorentino M; Giunchi F; Chessa F; Garofalo M; Bertaccini A; Angelini S; Ercolino A; Casablanca C; Droghetti M; Golfieri R; Schiavina R
Minerva Urol Nephrol; 2021 Jun; 73(3):357-366. PubMed ID: 33769008
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
20. Population-based study of grade progression in patients who harboured Gleason 3 + 3.
Sampurno F; Earnest A; Millar J; Frydenberg M; Murphy D; Delprado W; Evans S
World J Urol; 2017 Nov; 35(11):1689-1699. PubMed ID: 28500489
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
[Next] [New Search]
