These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

175 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 30039801)

  • 1. A predictive model of the drag coefficient for a revolving wing at low Reynolds number.
    Oh S; Choi H
    Bioinspir Biomim; 2018 Aug; 13(5):054001. PubMed ID: 30039801
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. Feather roughness reduces flow separation during low Reynolds number glides of swifts.
    van Bokhorst E; de Kat R; Elsinga GE; Lentink D
    J Exp Biol; 2015 Oct; 218(Pt 20):3179-91. PubMed ID: 26347563
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. The effects of wing twist in slow-speed flapping flight of birds: trading brute force against efficiency.
    Thielicke W; Stamhuis EJ
    Bioinspir Biomim; 2018 Aug; 13(5):056015. PubMed ID: 30043756
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. Power reduction and the radial limit of stall delay in revolving wings of different aspect ratio.
    Kruyt JW; van Heijst GF; Altshuler DL; Lentink D
    J R Soc Interface; 2015 Apr; 12(105):. PubMed ID: 25788539
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. Bristles reduce the force required to 'fling' wings apart in the smallest insects.
    Jones SK; Yun YJ; Hedrick TL; Griffith BE; Miller LA
    J Exp Biol; 2016 Dec; 219(Pt 23):3759-3772. PubMed ID: 27903629
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. Effects of flexibility and aspect ratio on the aerodynamic performance of flapping wings.
    Fu J; Liu X; Shyy W; Qiu H
    Bioinspir Biomim; 2018 Mar; 13(3):036001. PubMed ID: 29372888
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. Unsteady forces and flows in low Reynolds number hovering flight: two-dimensional computations vs robotic wing experiments.
    Wang ZJ; Birch JM; Dickinson MH
    J Exp Biol; 2004 Jan; 207(Pt 3):449-60. PubMed ID: 14691093
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. Combined particle-image velocimetry and force analysis of the three-dimensional fluid-structure interaction of a natural owl wing.
    Winzen A; Roidl B; Schröder W
    Bioinspir Biomim; 2016 Apr; 11(2):026005. PubMed ID: 27033298
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. A Quasi-Steady Lifting Line Theory for Insect-Like Hovering Flight.
    Nabawy MR; Crowthe WJ
    PLoS One; 2015; 10(8):e0134972. PubMed ID: 26252657
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. Aerodynamic force generation and power requirements in forward flight in a fruit fly with modeled wing motion.
    Sun M; Wu JH
    J Exp Biol; 2003 Sep; 206(Pt 17):3065-83. PubMed ID: 12878674
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. Birds repurpose the role of drag and lift to take off and land.
    Chin DD; Lentink D
    Nat Commun; 2019 Nov; 10(1):5354. PubMed ID: 31767856
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. Aerodynamics and three-dimensional effect of a translating bristled wing at low Reynolds numbers.
    Liu W; Sun M
    Sci Rep; 2022 Sep; 12(1):14966. PubMed ID: 36056054
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. Unsteady aerodynamic forces of a flapping wing.
    Wu JH; Sun M
    J Exp Biol; 2004 Mar; 207(Pt 7):1137-50. PubMed ID: 14978056
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. Clap and fling mechanism with interacting porous wings in tiny insect flight.
    Santhanakrishnan A; Robinson AK; Jones S; Low AA; Gadi S; Hedrick TL; Miller LA
    J Exp Biol; 2014 Nov; 217(Pt 21):3898-909. PubMed ID: 25189374
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. Forewings match the formation of leading-edge vortices and dominate aerodynamic force production in revolving insect wings.
    Chen D; Kolomenskiy D; Nakata T; Liu H
    Bioinspir Biomim; 2017 Dec; 13(1):016009. PubMed ID: 29052556
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. Wake analysis of aerodynamic components for the glide envelope of a jackdaw (Corvus monedula).
    KleinHeerenbrink M; Warfvinge K; Hedenström A
    J Exp Biol; 2016 May; 219(Pt 10):1572-81. PubMed ID: 26994178
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. Flow structure modifications by leading-edge tubercles on a 3D wing.
    Kim H; Kim J; Choi H
    Bioinspir Biomim; 2018 Oct; 13(6):066011. PubMed ID: 30362460
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. Aerodynamics of two parallel bristled wings in low Reynolds number flow.
    Wu YK; Liu YP; Sun M
    Sci Rep; 2022 Jun; 12(1):10928. PubMed ID: 35764779
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. Ground effect on the aerodynamics of three-dimensional hovering wings.
    Lu H; Lua KB; Lee YJ; Lim TT; Yeo KS
    Bioinspir Biomim; 2016 Oct; 11(6):066003. PubMed ID: 27780156
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. Flight of the honeybee. V. Drag and lift coefficients of the bee's body; implications for flight dynamics.
    Nachtigall W; Hanauer-Thieser U
    J Comp Physiol B; 1992; 162(3):267-77. PubMed ID: 1613166
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 9.