272 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 30040468)
1. Forward-Projected Model-Based Iterative Reconstruction in Screening Low-Dose Chest CT: Comparison With Adaptive Iterative Dose Reduction 3D.
Hassani C; Ronco A; Prosper AE; Dissanayake S; Cen SY; Lee C
AJR Am J Roentgenol; 2018 Sep; 211(3):548-556. PubMed ID: 30040468
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
2. Hybrid Type iterative reconstruction method vs. filter back projection method: Capability for radiation dose reduction and perfusion assessment on dynamic first-pass contrast-enhanced perfusion chest area-detector CT.
Ohno Y; Koyama H; Fujisawa Y; Yoshikawa T; Inokawa H; Sugihara N; Seki S; Sugimura K
Eur J Radiol; 2016 Jan; 85(1):164-175. PubMed ID: 26724662
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
3. Image Quality and Lesion Detection on Deep Learning Reconstruction and Iterative Reconstruction of Submillisievert Chest and Abdominal CT.
Singh R; Digumarthy SR; Muse VV; Kambadakone AR; Blake MA; Tabari A; Hoi Y; Akino N; Angel E; Madan R; Kalra MK
AJR Am J Roentgenol; 2020 Mar; 214(3):566-573. PubMed ID: 31967501
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
4. Dose reduction in chest CT: comparison of the adaptive iterative dose reduction 3D, adaptive iterative dose reduction, and filtered back projection reconstruction techniques.
Yamada Y; Jinzaki M; Hosokawa T; Tanami Y; Sugiura H; Abe T; Kuribayashi S
Eur J Radiol; 2012 Dec; 81(12):4185-95. PubMed ID: 22883532
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
5. Comparison of computer-aided detection (CADe) capability for pulmonary nodules among standard-, reduced- and ultra-low-dose CTs with and without hybrid type iterative reconstruction technique.
Ohno Y; Aoyagi K; Chen Q; Sugihara N; Iwasawa T; Okada F; Aoki T
Eur J Radiol; 2018 Mar; 100():49-57. PubMed ID: 29496079
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
6. Adaptive iterative dose reduction 3D (AIDR 3D) vs. filtered back projection: radiation dose reduction capabilities of wide volume and helical scanning techniques on area-detector CT in a chest phantom study.
Seki S; Koyama H; Ohno Y; Matsumoto S; Inokawa H; Sugihara N; Sugimura K
Acta Radiol; 2016 Jun; 57(6):684-90. PubMed ID: 26339037
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
7. Effects of Iterative Reconstruction Algorithms on Computer-assisted Detection (CAD) Software for Lung Nodules in Ultra-low-dose CT for Lung Cancer Screening.
Nomura Y; Higaki T; Fujita M; Miki S; Awaya Y; Nakanishi T; Yoshikawa T; Hayashi N; Awai K
Acad Radiol; 2017 Feb; 24(2):124-130. PubMed ID: 27986507
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
8. Effect of the forward-projected model-based iterative reconstruction solution algorithm on image quality and radiation dose in pediatric cardiac computed tomography.
Nishiyama Y; Tada K; Nishiyama Y; Mori H; Maruyama M; Katsube T; Yamamoto N; Kanayama H; Yamamoto Y; Kitagaki H
Pediatr Radiol; 2016 Nov; 46(12):1663-1670. PubMed ID: 27531216
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
9. Effect of Hybrid Kernel and Iterative Reconstruction on Objective and Subjective Analysis of Lung Nodule Calcification in Low-Dose Chest CT.
Hong SG; Kang EJ; Park JH; Choi WJ; Lee KN; Kwon HJ; Ha DH; Kim DW; Kim SH; Jo JH; Lee J
Korean J Radiol; 2018; 19(5):888-896. PubMed ID: 30174478
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
10. Comparison of Radiation Dose and Image Quality of Abdominopelvic CT Using Iterative (AIDR 3D) and Conventional Reconstructions.
Mello-Amoedo CD; Martins AN; Tachibana A; Pinho DF; Baroni RH
AJR Am J Roentgenol; 2018 Jan; 210(1):127-133. PubMed ID: 29140117
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
11. Adaptive iterative dose reduction using 3D processing for reduced- and low-dose pulmonary CT: comparison with standard-dose CT for image noise reduction and radiological findings.
Ohno Y; Takenaka D; Kanda T; Yoshikawa T; Matsumoto S; Sugihara N; Sugimura K
AJR Am J Roentgenol; 2012 Oct; 199(4):W477-85. PubMed ID: 22997397
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
12. The feasibility of Forward-projected model-based Iterative Reconstruction SoluTion (FIRST) for coronary 320-row computed tomography angiography: A pilot study.
Maeda E; Tomizawa N; Kanno S; Yasaka K; Kubo T; Ino K; Torigoe R; Ohtomo K
J Cardiovasc Comput Tomogr; 2017; 11(1):40-45. PubMed ID: 27894902
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
13. Metal artefact reduction for patients with metallic dental fillings in helical neck computed tomography: comparison of adaptive iterative dose reduction 3D (AIDR 3D), forward-projected model-based iterative reconstruction solution (FIRST) and AIDR 3D with single-energy metal artefact reduction (SEMAR).
Yasaka K; Kamiya K; Irie R; Maeda E; Sato J; Ohtomo K
Dentomaxillofac Radiol; 2016; 45(7):20160114. PubMed ID: 27268082
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
14. Lung nodule detection performance in five observers on computed tomography (CT) with adaptive iterative dose reduction using three-dimensional processing (AIDR 3D) in a Japanese multicenter study: Comparison between ultra-low-dose CT and low-dose CT by receiver-operating characteristic analysis.
Nagatani Y; Takahashi M; Murata K; Ikeda M; Yamashiro T; Miyara T; Koyama H; Koyama M; Sato Y; Moriya H; Noma S; Tomiyama N; Ohno Y; Murayama S;
Eur J Radiol; 2015 Jul; 84(7):1401-12. PubMed ID: 25892051
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
15. Comparison of CT image quality between the AIDR 3D and FIRST iterative reconstruction algorithms: an assessment based on phantom measurements and clinical images.
Leon S; Olguin E; Schaeffer C; Olguin C; Verma N; Mohammed TL; Grajo J; Arreola M
Phys Med Biol; 2021 Jun; 66(12):. PubMed ID: 34015770
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
16. Performance of adaptive iterative dose reduction 3D integrated with automatic tube current modulation in radiation dose and image noise reduction compared with filtered-back projection for 80-kVp abdominal CT: Anthropomorphic phantom and patient study.
Chen CM; Lin YY; Hsu MY; Hung CF; Liao YL; Tsai HY
Eur J Radiol; 2016 Sep; 85(9):1666-72. PubMed ID: 27501904
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
17. Impact of adaptive iterative dose reduction (AIDR) 3D on low-dose abdominal CT: comparison with routine-dose CT using filtered back projection.
Matsuki M; Murakami T; Juri H; Yoshikawa S; Narumi Y
Acta Radiol; 2013 Oct; 54(8):869-75. PubMed ID: 23761554
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
18. Sub-solid Nodule Detection Performance on Reduced-dose Computed Tomography with Iterative Reduction: Comparison Between 20 mA (7 mAs) and 120 mA (42 mAs) Regarding Nodular Size and Characteristics and Association with Size-specific Dose Estimate.
Nagatani Y; Takahashi M; Ikeda M; Yamashiro T; Koyama H; Koyama M; Moriya H; Noma S; Tomiyama N; Ohno Y; Murata K; Murayama S;
Acad Radiol; 2017 Aug; 24(8):995-1007. PubMed ID: 28606593
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
19. Effects of reconstruction technique on the quality of abdominal CT angiography: A comparison between forward projected model-based iterative reconstruction solution (FIRST) and conventional reconstruction methods.
Wu R; Hori M; Onishi H; Nakamoto A; Fukui H; Ota T; Nishida T; Enchi Y; Satoh K; Tomiyama N
Eur J Radiol; 2018 Sep; 106():100-105. PubMed ID: 30150030
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
20. Effects of contrast enhancement boost postprocessing technique in combination with different reconstruction algorithms on the image quality of abdominal CT angiography.
Xu J; Wang S; Wang X; Wang Y; Xue H; Yan J; Xu M; Jin Z
Eur J Radiol; 2022 Sep; 154():110388. PubMed ID: 35714492
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
[Next] [New Search]
