166 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 30041266)
1. Development and Validation of a Brief Four-Component Questionnaire to Identify Patient's Motivation to Undergo Functional Rhinoplasty.
Spiekermann C; Savvas E; Rudack C; Stenner M
Facial Plast Surg; 2018 Aug; 34(4):350-355. PubMed ID: 30041266
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
2. Reliability and validity of the German version of the Utrecht Questionnaire for Outcome Assessment in Aesthetic Rhinoplasty (D-OAR).
Spiekermann C; Rudack C; Stenner M
Eur Arch Otorhinolaryngol; 2017 Nov; 274(11):3893-3898. PubMed ID: 28815302
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
3. Influence of the Subjective Body Image on the Outcome of Functional Rhinoplasty.
Spiekermann C; Beule AG; Rudack C; Stenner M; Savvas E
Aesthetic Plast Surg; 2019 Feb; 43(1):196-201. PubMed ID: 30264272
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
4. Perceptions and satisfaction of aesthetic outcome following secondary cleft rhinoplasty: evaluation by patients versus health professionals.
Byrne M; Chan JC; O'Broin E
J Craniomaxillofac Surg; 2014 Oct; 42(7):1062-70. PubMed ID: 24581635
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
5. Discrepancy of the subjective perception of the nasal appearance between independent individuals and patients undergoing functional rhinoplasty (fRPL).
Heiming M; Savvas E; Rudack C; Stenner M; Spiekermann C
Eur Arch Otorhinolaryngol; 2023 Jan; 280(1):191-197. PubMed ID: 35763081
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
6. Benefits of a short, practical questionnaire to measure subjective perception of nasal appearance after aesthetic rhinoplasty.
Lohuis PJFM; Hakim S; Duivesteijn W; Knobbe A; Tasman AJ
Plast Reconstr Surg; 2013 Dec; 132(6):913e-923e. PubMed ID: 24281638
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
7. Assessment of Patient Satisfaction With Evaluation Methods in Open Technique Septorhinoplasty.
Başer E; Kocagöz GD; Çalim ÖF; Verim A; Yilmaz F; Özturan O
J Craniofac Surg; 2016 Mar; 27(2):420-4. PubMed ID: 26967078
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
8. Aesthetic Motivation of Geriatric Rhinoplasty The Surgical Outcome.
Hong HR; Kim SH; Kim JH; Jang YJ
J Craniofac Surg; 2015 Sep; 26(6):1936-9. PubMed ID: 26147023
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
9. A systematic review of patient-reported outcome measures after rhinoplasty.
Barone M; Cogliandro A; Di Stefano N; Tambone V; Persichetti P
Eur Arch Otorhinolaryngol; 2017 Apr; 274(4):1807-1811. PubMed ID: 27798735
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
10. Development and Psychometric Evaluation of the FACE-Q Scales for Patients Undergoing Rhinoplasty.
Klassen AF; Cano SJ; East CA; Baker SB; Badia L; Schwitzer JA; Pusic AL
JAMA Facial Plast Surg; 2016; 18(1):27-35. PubMed ID: 26605889
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
11. High patient satisfaction after secondary rhinoplasty in cleft lip patients.
Hens G; Picavet VA; Poorten VV; Schoenaers J; Jorissen M; Hellings PW
Int Forum Allergy Rhinol; 2011; 1(3):167-72. PubMed ID: 22287367
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
12. Functional and aesthetic concerns of patients seeking revision rhinoplasty.
Yu K; Kim A; Pearlman SJ
Arch Facial Plast Surg; 2010; 12(5):291-7. PubMed ID: 20855769
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
13. Functional and aesthetic results after septorhinoplasty and concomitant radiofrequency of the inferior turbinate: is there a role for patient reported outcome measures (PROMs)?
Parrilla C; Salvati A; Mastrapasqua RF; Artuso A; Paludetti G; Galli J
Eur Arch Otorhinolaryngol; 2019 Mar; 276(3):745-751. PubMed ID: 30604059
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
14. Evaluation of the effects of open and closed rhinoplasty on the psychosocial stress level and quality of life of rhinoplasty patients.
Gökçe Kütük S; Arıkan OK
J Plast Reconstr Aesthet Surg; 2019 Aug; 72(8):1347-1354. PubMed ID: 31078414
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
15. The Portuguese version of "The Utrecht questionnaire for outcome assessment in aesthetic rhinoplasty": validation and clinical application.
Rosa F; Lohuis PJFM; Almeida J; Santos M; Oliveira J; Sousa CAE; Ferreira M
Braz J Otorhinolaryngol; 2019; 85(2):170-175. PubMed ID: 29398579
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
16. Does self-consciousness of appearance influence postoperative satisfaction in rhinoplasty?
Herruer JM; Prins JB; van Heerbeek N; Verhage-Damen GWJA; Ingels KJAO
J Plast Reconstr Aesthet Surg; 2018 Jan; 71(1):79-84. PubMed ID: 28923458
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
17. Prospective Patient-Related Outcome Evaluation of Secondary Cleft Rhinoplasty Using a Validated Questionnaire.
Sawyer AR; Robinson S; Cadier M
Cleft Palate Craniofac J; 2017 Jul; 54(4):436-441. PubMed ID: 27439951
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
18. Cosmetics and function: quality-of-life changes after rhinoplasty surgery.
Saleh AM; Younes A; Friedman O
Laryngoscope; 2012 Feb; 122(2):254-9. PubMed ID: 22252921
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
19. Multidimensionality of Patient-Reported Outcome Measures in Rhinoplasty Satisfaction.
Verkest V; Pingnet L; Fransen E; Declau F
Facial Plast Surg; 2022 Oct; 38(5):468-476. PubMed ID: 35114725
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
20. Split hump technique for reduction of the overprojected nasal dorsum: a statistical analysis on subjective body image in relation to nasal appearance and nasal patency in 97 patients undergoing aesthetic rhinoplasty.
Lohuis PJ; Faraj-Hakim S; Knobbe A; Duivesteijn W; Bran GM
Arch Facial Plast Surg; 2012; 14(5):346-53. PubMed ID: 22986942
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
[Next] [New Search]
