317 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 30041661)
1. Women's and communities' views of targeted educational interventions to reduce unnecessary caesarean section: a qualitative evidence synthesis.
Kingdon C; Downe S; Betran AP
Reprod Health; 2018 Jul; 15(1):130. PubMed ID: 30041661
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
2. Do women prefer caesarean sections? A qualitative evidence synthesis of their views and experiences.
Colomar M; Opiyo N; Kingdon C; Long Q; Nion S; Bohren MA; Betran AP
PLoS One; 2021; 16(5):e0251072. PubMed ID: 33951101
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
3. Interventions targeted at health professionals to reduce unnecessary caesarean sections: a qualitative evidence synthesis.
Kingdon C; Downe S; Betran AP
BMJ Open; 2018 Dec; 8(12):e025073. PubMed ID: 30559163
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
4. Prevalence of and reasons for women's, family members', and health professionals' preferences for cesarean section in China: A mixed-methods systematic review.
Long Q; Kingdon C; Yang F; Renecle MD; Jahanfar S; Bohren MA; Betran AP
PLoS Med; 2018 Oct; 15(10):e1002672. PubMed ID: 30325928
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
5. Factors associated with women's birth beliefs and experiences of decision-making in the context of planned birth: A survey study.
Coates D; Donnolley N; Foureur M; Thirukumar P; Henry A
Midwifery; 2021 May; 96():102944. PubMed ID: 33610064
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
6. Women's, partners' and healthcare providers' views and experiences of assisted vaginal birth: a systematic mixed methods review.
Crossland N; Kingdon C; Balaam MC; Betrán AP; Downe S
Reprod Health; 2020 Jun; 17(1):83. PubMed ID: 32487226
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
7. Non-clinical interventions to reduce unnecessary caesarean section targeted at organisations, facilities and systems: Systematic review of qualitative studies.
Kingdon C; Downe S; Betran AP
PLoS One; 2018; 13(9):e0203274. PubMed ID: 30180198
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
8. Factors that influence the provision of intrapartum and postnatal care by skilled birth attendants in low- and middle-income countries: a qualitative evidence synthesis.
Munabi-Babigumira S; Glenton C; Lewin S; Fretheim A; Nabudere H
Cochrane Database Syst Rev; 2017 Nov; 11(11):CD011558. PubMed ID: 29148566
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
9. Prevalence of and reasons for women's, family members', and health professionals' preferences for cesarean section in Iran: a mixed-methods systematic review.
Shirzad M; Shakibazadeh E; Hajimiri K; Betran AP; Jahanfar S; Bohren MA; Opiyo N; Long Q; Kingdon C; Colomar M; Abedini M
Reprod Health; 2021 Jan; 18(1):3. PubMed ID: 33388072
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
10. 'Groping through the fog': a metasynthesis of women's experiences on VBAC (Vaginal birth after Caesarean section).
Lundgren I; Begley C; Gross MM; Bondas T
BMC Pregnancy Childbirth; 2012 Aug; 12():85. PubMed ID: 22909230
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
11. Interventions for supporting pregnant women's decision-making about mode of birth after a caesarean.
Horey D; Kealy M; Davey MA; Small R; Crowther CA
Cochrane Database Syst Rev; 2013 Jul; (7):CD010041. PubMed ID: 23897547
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
12. Factors that Influence Women's Decision on the Mode of Birth After a Previous Caesarean Section: A Meta-ethnography.
Hamilton EL; McLaughlin K; Mollart L
Int J Community Based Nurs Midwifery; 2023 Jul; 11(3):152-168. PubMed ID: 37489229
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
13. A comprehensive systematic review of factors influencing women's birthing preferences.
Bt Maznin NL; Creedy DK
JBI Libr Syst Rev; 2012; 10(4):232-306. PubMed ID: 27819971
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
14. How do informal information sources influence women's decision-making for birth? A meta-synthesis of qualitative studies.
Sanders RA; Crozier K
BMC Pregnancy Childbirth; 2018 Jan; 18(1):21. PubMed ID: 29316887
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
15. What are women's mode of birth preferences and why? A systematic scoping review.
Coates D; Thirukumar P; Spear V; Brown G; Henry A
Women Birth; 2020 Jul; 33(4):323-333. PubMed ID: 31607640
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
16. Non-clinical interventions for reducing unnecessary caesarean section.
Khunpradit S; Tavender E; Lumbiganon P; Laopaiboon M; Wasiak J; Gruen RL
Cochrane Database Syst Rev; 2011 Jun; (6):CD005528. PubMed ID: 21678348
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
17. Conflicting attitudes between clinicians and women regarding maternal requested caesarean section: a qualitative evidence synthesis.
Johansson M; Alvan J; Pettersson A; Hildingsson I
BMC Pregnancy Childbirth; 2023 Mar; 23(1):210. PubMed ID: 36978038
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
18. Barriers to and facilitators of smoking cessation in pregnancy and following childbirth: literature review and qualitative study.
Bauld L; Graham H; Sinclair L; Flemming K; Naughton F; Ford A; McKell J; McCaughan D; Hopewell S; Angus K; Eadie D; Tappin D
Health Technol Assess; 2017 Jun; 21(36):1-158. PubMed ID: 28661375
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
19. Influences on vaginal birth after caesarean section: A qualitative study of Taiwanese women.
Chen MM; McKellar L; Pincombe J
Women Birth; 2017 Apr; 30(2):e132-e139. PubMed ID: 27818106
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
20. Deciding on the mode of birth after a previous caesarean section - An online survey investigating women's preferences in Western Switzerland.
Bonzon M; Gross MM; Karch A; Grylka-Baeschlin S
Midwifery; 2017 Jul; 50():219-227. PubMed ID: 28478374
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
[Next] [New Search]
