121 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 30045174)
1. A Prospective Evaluation of Three-Dimensional Image Simulation: Patient-Reported Outcomes and Mammometrics in Primary Breast Augmentation.
Overschmidt B; Qureshi AA; Parikh RP; Yan Y; Tenenbaum MM; Myckatyn TM
Plast Reconstr Surg; 2018 Aug; 142(2):133e-144e. PubMed ID: 30045174
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
2. Discussion: A Prospective Evaluation of Three-Dimensional Image Simulation: Patient-Reported Outcomes and Mammometrics in Primary Breast Augmentation.
Roostaeian J; Adams WP
Plast Reconstr Surg; 2018 Aug; 142(2):148e-149e. PubMed ID: 30045176
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
3. Discussion: A Prospective Evaluation of Three-Dimensional Image Simulation: Patient-Reported Outcomes and Mammometrics in Primary Breast Augmentation.
Hidalgo DA
Plast Reconstr Surg; 2018 Aug; 142(2):145e-147e. PubMed ID: 30045175
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
4. Three-dimensional simulation of aesthetic outcome from breast-conserving surgery compared with viewing photographs or standard care: randomized clinical trial.
Godden AR; Micha A; Wolf LM; Pitches C; Barry PA; Khan AA; Krupa KDC; Kirby AM; Rusby JE
Br J Surg; 2021 Oct; 108(10):1181-1188. PubMed ID: 34370833
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
5. Three-dimensional Imaging and Simulation in Breast Augmentation: What Is the Current State of the Art?
Epstein MD; Scheflan M
Clin Plast Surg; 2015 Oct; 42(4):437-50. PubMed ID: 26408435
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
6. Four-dimensional breast imaging, part II: clinical implementation and validation of a computer imaging system for breast augmentation planning.
Creasman CN; Mordaunt D; Liolios T; Chiu C; Gabriel A; Maxwell GP
Aesthet Surg J; 2011 Nov; 31(8):925-38. PubMed ID: 22065882
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
7. Three-dimensional evaluation of breast augmentation and the influence of anatomic and round implants on operative breast shape changes.
Kovacs L; Eder M; Zimmermann A; Müller D; Schuster T; Papadopulos NA; Biemer E; Klöppel M; Machens HG
Aesthetic Plast Surg; 2012 Aug; 36(4):879-87. PubMed ID: 22535137
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
8. Main Factors Influencing Patient Satisfaction After Primary Breast Augmentation: A Prospective Study Based on Patient-Reported Outcome Measures.
Marangi GF; Savani L; Gratteri M; Arcari L; Segreto F; Cagli B; Cogliandro A; Vega R; Mirra C; Persichetti P
Aesthet Surg J; 2024 Mar; 44(4):375-382. PubMed ID: 38114077
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
9. An innovative three-dimensional approach to defining the anatomical changes occurring after short scar-medial pedicle reduction mammaplasty.
Tepper OM; Choi M; Small K; Unger J; Davidson E; Rudolph L; Pritchard A; Karp NS
Plast Reconstr Surg; 2008 Jun; 121(6):1875-1885. PubMed ID: 18520872
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
10. Customized planning of augmentation mammaplasty with silicon implants using three-dimensional optical body scans and biomechanical modeling of soft tissue outcome.
Gladilin E; Gabrielova B; Montemurro P; Hedén P
Aesthetic Plast Surg; 2011 Aug; 35(4):494-501. PubMed ID: 21184065
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
11. Clinical applications of three-dimensional photography in breast surgery.
Galdino GM; Nahabedian M; Chiaramonte M; Geng JZ; Klatsky S; Manson P
Plast Reconstr Surg; 2002 Jul; 110(1):58-70. PubMed ID: 12087232
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
12. Three-Dimensional Imaging for Breast Augmentation: Is This Technology Providing Accurate Simulations?
Roostaeian J; Adams WP
Aesthet Surg J; 2014 Aug; 34(6):857-75. PubMed ID: 24970274
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
13. Three-dimensional evaluation of breast contour and volume changes following subpectoral augmentation mammaplasty over 6 months.
Eder M; v Waldenfels F; Sichtermann M; Schuster T; Papadopulos NA; Machens HG; Biemer E; Kovacs L
J Plast Reconstr Aesthet Surg; 2011 Sep; 64(9):1152-60. PubMed ID: 21550866
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
14. The magnitude of effect of cosmetic breast augmentation on patient satisfaction and health-related quality of life.
McCarthy CM; Cano SJ; Klassen AF; Scott A; Van Laeken N; Lennox PA; Cordeiro PG; Pusic AL
Plast Reconstr Surg; 2012 Jul; 130(1):218-223. PubMed ID: 22743886
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
15. Clinical accuracy and reproducibility of Portrait 3D Surgical Simulation Platform in breast augmentation.
Mailey B; Freel A; Wong R; Pointer DT; Khoobehi K
Aesthet Surg J; 2013 Jan; 33(1):84-92. PubMed ID: 23220877
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
16. Development and implementation of a web-enabled 3D consultation tool for breast augmentation surgery based on 3D-image reconstruction of 2D pictures.
de Heras Ciechomski P; Constantinescu M; Garcia J; Olariu R; Dindoyal I; Le Huu S; Reyes M
J Med Internet Res; 2012 Feb; 14(1):e21. PubMed ID: 22306688
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
17. Three-dimensional simulated images in breast augmentation surgery: an investigation of patients' satisfaction and the correlation between prediction and actual outcome.
Donfrancesco A; Montemurro P; Hedén P
Plast Reconstr Surg; 2013 Oct; 132(4):810-822. PubMed ID: 24076673
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
18. Prospective photographic measurement study of 196 cases of breast augmentation, mastopexy, augmentation/mastopexy, and breast reduction.
Swanson E
Plast Reconstr Surg; 2013 May; 131(5):802e-819e. PubMed ID: 23629120
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
19. Incidence of breast and chest wall asymmetries: 4D photography.
Gabriel A; Fritzsche S; Creasman C; Baqai W; Mordaunt D; Maxwell GP
Aesthet Surg J; 2011 Jul; 31(5):506-10. PubMed ID: 21632915
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
20. A computational tool for preoperative breast augmentation planning in aesthetic plastic surgery.
Georgii J; Eder M; Bürger K; Klotz S; Ferstl F; Kovacs L; Westermann R
IEEE J Biomed Health Inform; 2014 May; 18(3):907-19. PubMed ID: 24132029
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
[Next] [New Search]
