These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

67 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 30045458)

  • 1. Is the Attitude-Attribution Paradigm Suitable for Investigating the Dispositional Bias?
    Wright EF; Wells GL
    Pers Soc Psychol Bull; 1988 Mar; 14(1):183-190. PubMed ID: 30045458
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. Age differences in the correspondence bias: when a plausible explanation matters.
    Blanchard-Fields F; Horhota M
    J Gerontol B Psychol Sci Soc Sci; 2005 Sep; 60(5):P259-67. PubMed ID: 16131620
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. Perceiving choice and constraint: the effects of contextual and behavioral cues on attitude attribution.
    Fleming JH; Darley JM
    J Pers Soc Psychol; 1989 Jan; 56(1):27-40. PubMed ID: 2926615
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. Does the Correspondence Bias Apply to Social Robots?: Dispositional and Situational Attributions of Human Versus Robot Behavior.
    Edwards A; Edwards C
    Front Robot AI; 2021; 8():788242. PubMed ID: 35059443
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. Mindfulness reduces the correspondence bias.
    Hopthrow T; Hooper N; Mahmood L; Meier BP; Weger U
    Q J Exp Psychol (Hove); 2017 Mar; 70(3):351-360. PubMed ID: 27030310
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. Dispositional attribution: multiple inferences about motive-related traits.
    Reeder GD; Vonk R; Ronk MJ; Ham J; Lawrence M
    J Pers Soc Psychol; 2004 Apr; 86(4):530-44. PubMed ID: 15053704
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. Cultural differences in the correction of social inferences: Does the dispositional rebound occur in an interdependent culture?
    Geeraert N; Yzerbyt VY
    Br J Soc Psychol; 2007 Jun; 46(Pt 2):423-35. PubMed ID: 17565790
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. Personalism and cognitive labels as determinants of attitude attribution.
    West SG
    Mem Cognit; 1975 Sep; 3(5):496-500. PubMed ID: 24203870
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. Implicational schemata and the correspondence bias: on the diagnostic value of situationally constrained behavior.
    Gawronski B
    J Pers Soc Psychol; 2003 Jun; 84(6):1154-71. PubMed ID: 12793582
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. When values and attributions collide: liberals' and conservatives' values motivate attributions for alleged misdeeds.
    Morgan GS; Mullen E; Skitka LJ
    Pers Soc Psychol Bull; 2010 Sep; 36(9):1241-54. PubMed ID: 20699405
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. The association between implicit theories of personality and the attributional process.
    Silvera DH; Moe SK; Iversen P
    Scand J Psychol; 2000 Jun; 41(2):107-11. PubMed ID: 10870429
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. Self-image bias in drug use attributions.
    Monk RL; Heim D
    Psychol Addict Behav; 2011 Dec; 25(4):645-51. PubMed ID: 21988477
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. Cynicism about organizational change: an attribution process perspective.
    Wanous JP; Reichers AE; Austin JT
    Psychol Rep; 2004 Jun; 94(3 Pt 2):1421-34. PubMed ID: 15362427
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. Fundamental(ist) attribution error: Protestants are dispositionally focused.
    Li YJ; Johnson KA; Cohen AB; Williams MJ; Knowles ED; Chen Z
    J Pers Soc Psychol; 2012 Feb; 102(2):281-90. PubMed ID: 22082060
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. Documenting individual differences in the propensity to hold attitudes with certainty.
    DeMarree KG; Petty RE; Briñol P; Xia J
    J Pers Soc Psychol; 2020 Dec; 119(6):1239-1265. PubMed ID: 32584098
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. How choice affects and reflects preferences: revisiting the free-choice paradigm.
    Chen MK; Risen JL
    J Pers Soc Psychol; 2010 Oct; 99(4):573-94. PubMed ID: 20658837
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. Dispositions, scripts, or motivated correction? Understanding ideological differences in explanations for social problems.
    Skitka LJ; Mullen E; Griffin T; Hutchinson S; Chamberlin B
    J Pers Soc Psychol; 2002 Aug; 83(2):470-487. PubMed ID: 12150241
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. Success attributions and more: multidimensional extensions of the sexual attribution bias to failure attributions, social emotions, and the desire for social interaction.
    Agthe M; Spörrle M; Försterling F
    Pers Soc Psychol Bull; 2008 Dec; 34(12):1627-38. PubMed ID: 19050336
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. Wishful thinking and source monitoring.
    Gordon R; Franklin N; Beck J
    Mem Cognit; 2005 Apr; 33(3):418-29. PubMed ID: 16156178
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. Modelling Speaker Attribution in Narrative Texts With Biased and Bias-Adjustable Neural Networks.
    Dönicke T; Varachkina H; Weimer AM; Gödeke L; Barth F; Gittel B; Holler A; Sporleder C
    Front Artif Intell; 2021; 4():725321. PubMed ID: 35187471
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 4.