These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

121 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 30045651)

  • 1. Data Analyses When Sample Sizes Are Small: Modern Advances for Dealing With Outliers, Skewed Distributions, and Heteroscedasticity.
    Wilcox R; Peterson TJ; McNitt-Gray JL
    J Appl Biomech; 2018 Aug; 34(4):258-261. PubMed ID: 30045651
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. An Updated Guide to Robust Statistical Methods in Neuroscience.
    Wilcox RR; Rousselet GA
    Curr Protoc; 2023 Mar; 3(3):e719. PubMed ID: 36971417
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. Sample size determinations for Welch's test in one-way heteroscedastic ANOVA.
    Jan SL; Shieh G
    Br J Math Stat Psychol; 2014 Feb; 67(1):72-93. PubMed ID: 23316952
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. A Guide to Robust Statistical Methods in Neuroscience.
    Wilcox RR; Rousselet GA
    Curr Protoc Neurosci; 2018 Jan; 82():8.42.1-8.42.30. PubMed ID: 29357109
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. MODERN REGRESSION METHODS THAT CAN SUBSTANTIALLY INCREASE POWER AND PROVIDE A MORE ACCURATE UNDERSTANDING OF ASSOCIATIONS.
    Wilcox RR; Keselman HJ
    Eur J Pers; 2012 May; 26(3):165-174. PubMed ID: 23626402
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. Understanding the practical advantages of modern ANOVA methods.
    Wilcox RR
    J Clin Child Adolesc Psychol; 2002 Sep; 31(3):399-412. PubMed ID: 12149978
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. Dealing with skewed data: an example using asthma-related costs of medicaid clients.
    Rascati KL; Smith MJ; Neilands T
    Clin Ther; 2001 Mar; 23(3):481-98. PubMed ID: 11318082
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. Performance of five two-sample location tests for skewed distributions with unequal variances.
    Fagerland MW; Sandvik L
    Contemp Clin Trials; 2009 Sep; 30(5):490-6. PubMed ID: 19577012
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. A mixture-model approach for parallel testing for unequal variances.
    Bar HY; Booth JG; Wells MT
    Stat Appl Genet Mol Biol; 2012 Jan; 11(1):Article 8. PubMed ID: 22499680
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. The sensitivity of three methods to nonnormality and unequal variances in interval estimation of effect sizes.
    Chen LT; Peng CY
    Behav Res Methods; 2015 Mar; 47(1):107-26. PubMed ID: 24793819
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. Robust nonlinear regression in applications.
    Lim C; Sen PK; Peddada SD
    J Indian Soc Agric Stat; 2013; 67(2):215-234. PubMed ID: 25580021
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. A comprehensive review of group level model performance in the presence of heteroscedasticity: Can a single model control Type I errors in the presence of outliers?
    Mumford JA
    Neuroimage; 2017 Feb; 147():658-668. PubMed ID: 28030782
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. The influence of nonnormality from primary studies on the standardized mean difference in meta-analysis.
    Sun RW; Cheung SF
    Behav Res Methods; 2020 Aug; 52(4):1552-1567. PubMed ID: 31898292
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. Approximate sample size formulas for the two-sample trimmed mean test with unequal variances.
    Luh WM; Guo JH
    Br J Math Stat Psychol; 2007 May; 60(Pt 1):137-46. PubMed ID: 17535584
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. Response to letter to the editor from Dr Rahman Shiri: The challenging topic of suicide across occupational groups.
    Niedhammer I; Milner A; Witt K; Klingelschmidt J; Khireddine-Medouni I; Alexopoulos EC; Toivanen S; Chastang JF; LaMontagne AD
    Scand J Work Environ Health; 2018 Jan; 44(1):108-110. PubMed ID: 29218357
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. Hypothesis Testing,
    Wilcox RR; Serang S
    Educ Psychol Meas; 2017 Aug; 77(4):673-689. PubMed ID: 30034026
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. Persistent confusion in nutrition and obesity research about the validity of classic nonparametric tests in the presence of heteroscedasticity: evidence of the problem and valid alternatives.
    Kroeger CM; Ejima K; Hannon BA; Halliday TM; McComb B; Teran-Garcia M; Dawson JA; King DB; Brown AW; Allison DB
    Am J Clin Nutr; 2021 Mar; 113(3):517-524. PubMed ID: 33515017
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. Evaluating the robustness of repeated measures analyses: the case of small sample sizes and nonnormal data.
    Oberfeld D; Franke T
    Behav Res Methods; 2013 Sep; 45(3):792-812. PubMed ID: 23184532
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. A nonparametric two-sample comparison for skewed data with unequal variances.
    Neuhäuser M
    J Clin Epidemiol; 2010 Jun; 63(6):691-3. PubMed ID: 20056388
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. A robust procedure for comparing multiple means under heteroscedasticity in unbalanced designs.
    Herberich E; Sikorski J; Hothorn T
    PLoS One; 2010 Mar; 5(3):e9788. PubMed ID: 20360960
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 7.