These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

214 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 30047496)

  • 1. Assessment of Coronary Flow Velocity Reserve in the Left Main Trunk Using Phase-contrast MR Imaging at 3T: Comparison with
    Kikuchi Y; Naya M; Oyama-Manabe N; Manabe O; Sugimori H; Kudo K; Kato F; Aikawa T; Tsutsui H; Tamaki N; Shirato H
    Magn Reson Med Sci; 2019 Apr; 18(2):134-141. PubMed ID: 30047496
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. Estimation of myocardial blood flow and myocardial flow reserve by 99mTc-sestamibi imaging: comparison with the results of [15O]H2O PET.
    Ito Y; Katoh C; Noriyasu K; Kuge Y; Furuyama H; Morita K; Kohya T; Kitabatake A; Tamaki N
    Eur J Nucl Med Mol Imaging; 2003 Feb; 30(2):281-7. PubMed ID: 12552347
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. Diagnostic value of PET-measured longitudinal flow gradient for the identification of coronary artery disease.
    Valenta I; Quercioli A; Schindler TH
    JACC Cardiovasc Imaging; 2014 Apr; 7(4):387-96. PubMed ID: 24631507
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. Comparison between quantitative cardiac magnetic resonance perfusion imaging and [
    Everaars H; van Diemen PA; Bom MJ; Schumacher SP; de Winter RW; van de Ven PM; Raijmakers PG; Lammertsma AA; Hofman MBM; van der Geest RJ; Götte MJ; van Rossum AC; Nijveldt R; Danad I; Driessen RS; Knaapen P
    Eur J Nucl Med Mol Imaging; 2020 Jul; 47(7):1688-1697. PubMed ID: 31822958
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. First validation of myocardial flow reserve assessed by dynamic
    Agostini D; Roule V; Nganoa C; Roth N; Baavour R; Parienti JJ; Beygui F; Manrique A
    Eur J Nucl Med Mol Imaging; 2018 Jul; 45(7):1079-1090. PubMed ID: 29497801
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. Coronary flow velocity reserve in three major coronary arteries by transthoracic echocardiography for the functional assessment of coronary artery disease: a comparison with fractional flow reserve.
    Wada T; Hirata K; Shiono Y; Orii M; Shimamura K; Ishibashi K; Tanimoto T; Yamano T; Ino Y; Kitabata H; Yamaguchi T; Kubo T; Imanishi T; Akasaka T
    Eur Heart J Cardiovasc Imaging; 2014 Apr; 15(4):399-408. PubMed ID: 24067807
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. Absolute flow or myocardial flow reserve for the detection of significant coronary artery disease?
    Joutsiniemi E; Saraste A; Pietilä M; Mäki M; Kajander S; Ukkonen H; Airaksinen J; Knuuti J
    Eur Heart J Cardiovasc Imaging; 2014 Jun; 15(6):659-65. PubMed ID: 24408930
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. Coronary flow velocity reserve by echocardiography: feasibility, reproducibility and agreement with PET in overweight and obese patients with stable and revascularized coronary artery disease.
    Olsen RH; Pedersen LR; Snoer M; Christensen TE; Ghotbi AA; Hasbak P; Kjaer A; Haugaard SB; Prescott E
    Cardiovasc Ultrasound; 2016 Jun; 14(1):22. PubMed ID: 27267255
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. Characterization of functionally significant coronary artery disease by a coronary computed tomography angiography-based index: a comparison with positron emission tomography.
    Anagnostopoulos CD; Siogkas PK; Liga R; Benetos G; Maaniitty T; Sakellarios AI; Koutagiar I; Karakitsios I; Papafaklis MI; Berti V; Sciagrà R; Scholte AJHA; Michalis LK; Gaemperli O; Kaufmann PA; Pelosi G; Parodi O; Knuuti J; Fotiadis DI; Neglia D
    Eur Heart J Cardiovasc Imaging; 2019 Aug; 20(8):897-905. PubMed ID: 30629151
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. Assessment of coronary flow reserve using fast velocity-encoded cine MR imaging: validation study using positron emission tomography.
    Sakuma H; Koskenvuo JW; Niemi P; Kawada N; Toikka JO; Knuuti J; Laine H; Saraste M; Kormano M; Hartiala JJ
    AJR Am J Roentgenol; 2000 Oct; 175(4):1029-33. PubMed ID: 11000158
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. Quantification of myocardial blood flow with dynamic perfusion 3.0 Tesla MRI: Validation with (15) O-water PET.
    Tomiyama Y; Manabe O; Oyama-Manabe N; Naya M; Sugimori H; Hirata K; Mori Y; Tsutsui H; Kudo K; Tamaki N; Katoh C
    J Magn Reson Imaging; 2015 Sep; 42(3):754-62. PubMed ID: 25557072
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. Quantitative assessment of regional myocardial flow reserve using tc-99m-sestamibi imaging.
    Tsukamoto T; Ito Y; Noriyasu K; Morita K; Katoh C; Okamoto H; Tamaki N
    Circ J; 2005 Feb; 69(2):188-93. PubMed ID: 15671611
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. SPECT myocardial blood flow quantitation toward clinical use: a comparative study with
    Hsu B; Hu LH; Yang BH; Chen LC; Chen YK; Ting CH; Hung GU; Huang WS; Wu TC
    Eur J Nucl Med Mol Imaging; 2017 Jan; 44(1):117-128. PubMed ID: 27585576
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. Assessment of coronary flow reserve: comparison between contrast-enhanced magnetic resonance imaging and positron emission tomography.
    Ibrahim T; Nekolla SG; Schreiber K; Odaka K; Volz S; Mehilli J; Güthlin M; Delius W; Schwaiger M
    J Am Coll Cardiol; 2002 Mar; 39(5):864-70. PubMed ID: 11869854
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. Improved regional myocardial blood flow and flow reserve after coronary revascularization as assessed by serial 15O-water positron emission tomography/computed tomography.
    Aikawa T; Naya M; Koyanagawa K; Manabe O; Obara M; Magota K; Oyama-Manabe N; Tamaki N; Anzai T
    Eur Heart J Cardiovasc Imaging; 2020 Jan; 21(1):36-46. PubMed ID: 31544927
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. Diagnostic accuracy of stress myocardial computed tomography perfusion imaging to detect myocardial ischemia: a comparison with coronary flow velocity reserve derived from transthoracic Doppler echocardiography.
    Kono T; Uetani T; Inoue K; Nagai T; Nishimura K; Suzuki J; Tanabe Y; Kido T; Kurata A; Mochizuki T; Ogimoto A; Okura T; Higaki J; Yamaguchi O; Ikeda S
    J Cardiol; 2020 Sep; 76(3):251-258. PubMed ID: 32354493
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. Feasibility of myocardial flow reserve prediction without the use of dynamic data from myocardial perfusion positron emission tomography.
    Hashimoto H; Fukushima Y; Kumita SI; Tomiyama T; Kiriyama T
    Int J Cardiovasc Imaging; 2018 Aug; 34(8):1323-1329. PubMed ID: 29556942
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. Assessment of coronary flow velocity reserve with phase-contrast cine magnetic resonance imaging in patients with heavy coronary calcification.
    Higashikawa T; Ichikawa Y; Ishida M; Kitagawa K; Hirano T; Sakuma H
    Int J Cardiovasc Imaging; 2019 May; 35(5):897-905. PubMed ID: 30805755
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. 15-O-water myocardial flow reserve PET and CT angiography by full hybrid PET/CT as a potential alternative to invasive angiography.
    Thomassen A; Braad PE; Pedersen KT; Petersen H; Johansen A; Diederichsen ACP; Mickley H; Jensen LO; Knuuti J; Gerke O; Høilund-Carlsen PF
    Int J Cardiovasc Imaging; 2018 Dec; 34(12):2011-2022. PubMed ID: 30066164
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. Comparison of two software systems for quantification of myocardial blood flow in patients with hypertrophic cardiomyopathy.
    Yalcin H; Valenta I; Zhao M; Tahari A; Lu DY; Higuchi T; Yalcin F; Kucukler N; Soleimanifard Y; Zhou Y; Pomper MG; Abraham TP; Tsui B; Lodge MA; Schindler TH; Roselle Abraham M
    J Nucl Cardiol; 2019 Aug; 26(4):1243-1253. PubMed ID: 29359273
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 11.