151 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 30047768)
1. Are cognitive control processes reliable?
Whitehead PS; Brewer GA; Blais C
J Exp Psychol Learn Mem Cogn; 2019 May; 45(5):765-778. PubMed ID: 30047768
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
2. Interacting congruency effects in the hybrid Stroop-Simon task prevent conclusions regarding the domain specificity or generality of the congruency sequence effect.
Weissman DH
J Exp Psychol Learn Mem Cogn; 2020 May; 46(5):945-967. PubMed ID: 31580121
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
3. Strategy and processing speed eclipse individual differences in control ability in conflict tasks.
Hedge C; Powell G; Bompas A; Sumner P
J Exp Psychol Learn Mem Cogn; 2022 Oct; 48(10):1448-1469. PubMed ID: 34591554
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
4. Linking the dynamics of cognitive control to individual differences in working memory capacity: Evidence from reaching behavior.
Erb CD; Welhaf MS; Smeekens BA; Moreau D; Kane MJ; Marcovitch S
J Exp Psychol Learn Mem Cogn; 2021 Sep; 47(9):1383-1402. PubMed ID: 34197169
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
5. Do Young Children Modulate Their Cognitive Control?
Ambrosi S; Lemaire P; Blaye A
Exp Psychol; 2016 Mar; 63(2):117-26. PubMed ID: 27221602
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
6. A behavioural and electrophysiological investigation of the effect of bilingualism on aging and cognitive control.
Kousaie S; Phillips NA
Neuropsychologia; 2017 Jan; 94():23-35. PubMed ID: 27876508
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
7. Exploring the differences in distributional properties between Stroop and Simon effects using delta plots.
Pratte MS; Rouder JN; Morey RD; Feng C
Atten Percept Psychophys; 2010 Oct; 72(7):2013-25. PubMed ID: 20952797
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
8. Overshooting cognitive control adjustments in older age: Evidence from conflict- and error-related slowing in the Stroop, Simon, and flanker tasks.
Dubravac M; Meier B
Acta Psychol (Amst); 2023 Apr; 234():103874. PubMed ID: 36857883
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
9. Cognitive control across the lifespan: Congruency effects reveal divergent developmental trajectories.
Erb CD; Germine L; Hartshorne JK
J Exp Psychol Gen; 2023 Nov; 152(11):3285-3291. PubMed ID: 37289513
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
10. Distributional analyses reveal the individual differences in congruency sequence effect.
Tang D; Chen X; Li H; Lei Y
PLoS One; 2022; 17(8):e0272621. PubMed ID: 35994475
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
11. Transcranial direct current stimulation (tDCS) over the right dorsolateral prefrontal cortex affects stimulus conflict but not response conflict.
Zmigrod S; Zmigrod L; Hommel B
Neuroscience; 2016 May; 322():320-5. PubMed ID: 26924018
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
12. Adolescent risk-taking is predicted by individual differences in cognitive control over emotional, but not non-emotional, response conflict.
Botdorf M; Rosenbaum GM; Patrianakos J; Steinberg L; Chein JM
Cogn Emot; 2017 Aug; 31(5):972-979. PubMed ID: 27050317
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
13. The Specificity and Reliability of Conflict Adaptation: A Mouse-Tracking Study.
Grundy JG
Front Psychol; 2021; 12():770509. PubMed ID: 35087450
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
14. The benefit of expecting no conflict--Stronger influence of self-generated than cue-induced conflict expectations on Stroop performance.
Kemper M; Gaschler R; Schwager S; Schubert T
Acta Psychol (Amst); 2016 Jan; 163():135-41. PubMed ID: 26649453
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
15. Cognitive control across adolescence: Dynamic adjustments and mind-wandering.
Gyurkovics M; Stafford T; Levita L
J Exp Psychol Gen; 2020 Jun; 149(6):1017-1031. PubMed ID: 31599622
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
16. Low and variable correlation between reaction time costs and accuracy costs explained by accumulation models: Meta-analysis and simulations.
Hedge C; Powell G; Bompas A; Vivian-Griffiths S; Sumner P
Psychol Bull; 2018 Nov; 144(11):1200-1227. PubMed ID: 30265012
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
17. Linking computational models of two core tasks of cognitive control.
Robinson MM; Steyvers M
Psychol Rev; 2023 Jan; 130(1):71-101. PubMed ID: 36227284
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
18. Control processes through the suppression of the automatic response activation triggered by task-irrelevant information in the Simon-type tasks.
Kim S; Lee SH; Cho YS
Acta Psychol (Amst); 2015 Nov; 162():51-61. PubMed ID: 26479902
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
19. A toolbox approach to improving the measurement of attention control.
Draheim C; Tsukahara JS; Martin JD; Mashburn CA; Engle RW
J Exp Psychol Gen; 2021 Feb; 150(2):242-275. PubMed ID: 32700925
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
20. Age-related qualitative differences in post-error cognitive control adjustments.
Dubravac M; Roebers CM; Meier B
Br J Dev Psychol; 2022 Jun; 40(2):287-305. PubMed ID: 35040504
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
[Next] [New Search]