These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

213 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 30047769)

  • 1. Survival analyses reveal how early phonological processing affects eye movements during reading.
    Leinenger M
    J Exp Psychol Learn Mem Cogn; 2019 Jul; 45(7):1316-1344. PubMed ID: 30047769
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. The role of preview validity in predictability and frequency effects on eye movements in reading.
    Staub A; Goddard K
    J Exp Psychol Learn Mem Cogn; 2019 Jan; 45(1):110-127. PubMed ID: 29648870
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. Phonological codes are assembled before word fixation: evidence from boundary paradigm in sentence reading.
    Miellet S; Sparrow L
    Brain Lang; 2004; 90(1-3):299-310. PubMed ID: 15172547
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. Use of phonological codes for Chinese characters: evidence from processing of parafoveal preview when reading sentences.
    Tsai JL; Lee CY; Tzeng OJ; Hung DL; Yen NS
    Brain Lang; 2004 Nov; 91(2):235-44. PubMed ID: 15485712
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. Parafoveal processing of transposed-letter words and nonwords: evidence against parafoveal lexical activation.
    Johnson RL; Dunne MD
    J Exp Psychol Hum Percept Perform; 2012 Feb; 38(1):191-212. PubMed ID: 22060141
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. Vowel processing during silent reading: evidence from eye movements.
    Ashby J; Treiman R; Kessler B; Rayner K
    J Exp Psychol Learn Mem Cogn; 2006 Mar; 32(2):416-24. PubMed ID: 16569156
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. Investigating word length effects in Chinese reading.
    Zang C; Fu Y; Bai X; Yan G; Liversedge SP
    J Exp Psychol Hum Percept Perform; 2018 Dec; 44(12):1831-1841. PubMed ID: 30475051
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. Reversed preview benefit effects: Forced fixations emphasize the importance of parafoveal vision for efficient reading.
    Schotter ER; Leinenger M
    J Exp Psychol Hum Percept Perform; 2016 Dec; 42(12):2039-2067. PubMed ID: 27732044
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. Orthographic and phonological preview benefits: parafoveal processing in skilled and less-skilled deaf readers.
    Bélanger NN; Mayberry RI; Rayner K
    Q J Exp Psychol (Hove); 2013; 66(11):2237-52. PubMed ID: 23768045
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. Capitalization interacts with syntactic complexity.
    Cutter MG; Martin AE; Sturt P
    J Exp Psychol Learn Mem Cogn; 2020 Jun; 46(6):1146-1164. PubMed ID: 31621360
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. The time course of age-of-acquisition effects on eye movements during reading: Evidence from survival analyses.
    Juhasz BJ; Sheridan H
    Mem Cognit; 2020 Jan; 48(1):83-95. PubMed ID: 31278632
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. Eye movements and phonological parafoveal preview: effects of reading skill.
    Chace KH; Rayner K; Well AD
    Can J Exp Psychol; 2005 Sep; 59(3):209-17. PubMed ID: 16248500
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. Activation time-course of phonological code in silent word recognition in adult readers with and without dyslexia.
    Denis-Noël A; Pattamadilok C; Castet É; Colé P
    Ann Dyslexia; 2020 Oct; 70(3):313-338. PubMed ID: 32712818
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. Is semantic preview benefit due to relatedness or plausibility?
    Veldre A; Andrews S
    J Exp Psychol Hum Percept Perform; 2016 Jul; 42(7):939-52. PubMed ID: 26752734
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. Eye movement control in Chinese reading: A cross-sectional study.
    Yan M; Pan J; Kliegl R
    Dev Psychol; 2019 Nov; 55(11):2275-2285. PubMed ID: 31535894
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. Do effects of visual contrast and font difficulty on readers' eye movements interact with effects of word frequency or predictability?
    Staub A
    J Exp Psychol Hum Percept Perform; 2020 Nov; 46(11):1235-1251. PubMed ID: 32730070
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. Parafoveal-on-foveal effects of emotional word semantics in reading Chinese sentences: evidence from eye movements.
    Yan M; Sommer W
    J Exp Psychol Learn Mem Cogn; 2015 Jul; 41(4):1237-43. PubMed ID: 25581226
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. Attention and eye-movement control in reading: The selective reading paradigm.
    Reingold EM; Sheridan H; Meadmore KL; Drieghe D; Liversedge SP
    J Exp Psychol Hum Percept Perform; 2016 Dec; 42(12):2003-2020. PubMed ID: 27643527
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. Activation of phonological codes during eye fixations in reading.
    Lee YA; Binder KS; Kim JO; Pollatsek A; Rayner K
    J Exp Psychol Hum Percept Perform; 1999 Aug; 25(4):948-64. PubMed ID: 10464940
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. Surviving blind decomposition: A distributional analysis of the time-course of complex word recognition.
    Schmidtke D; Matsuki K; Kuperman V
    J Exp Psychol Learn Mem Cogn; 2017 Nov; 43(11):1793-1820. PubMed ID: 28447810
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 11.