257 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 30047770)
1. Spatial memory for vertical locations.
Hinterecker T; Leroy C; Kirschhock ME; Zhao M; Butz MV; Bülthoff HH; Meilinger T
J Exp Psychol Learn Mem Cogn; 2019 Jul; 45(7):1205-1223. PubMed ID: 30047770
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
2. No advantage for remembering horizontal over vertical spatial locations learned from a single viewpoint.
Hinterecker T; Leroy C; Zhao M; Butz MV; Bülthoff HH; Meilinger T
Mem Cognit; 2018 Jan; 46(1):158-171. PubMed ID: 28875474
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
3. Allocentric visual cues influence mental transformation of bodies.
Preuss N; Harris LR; Mast FW
J Vis; 2013 Oct; 13(12):14. PubMed ID: 24133294
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
4. Perceived self-orientation in allocentric and egocentric space: effects of visual and physical tilt on saccadic and tactile measures.
Barnett-Cowan M; Harris LR
Brain Res; 2008 Nov; 1242():231-43. PubMed ID: 18706895
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
5. Gravitational and retinal reference frames shape spatial memory.
Tucciarelli R; Ferrè ER; Amoruso E; Azañón E; Longo MR
J Exp Psychol Gen; 2023 Dec; 152(12):3433-3439. PubMed ID: 37561498
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
6. Extrinsic reference frames modify the neural substrates of object-location representations.
Chan E; Baumann O; Bellgrove MA; Mattingley JB
Neuropsychologia; 2013 Apr; 51(5):781-8. PubMed ID: 23422330
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
7. Intrinsic frames of reference in haptic spatial learning.
Yamamoto N; Philbeck JW
Cognition; 2013 Nov; 129(2):447-56. PubMed ID: 24007919
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
8. Gravity and observer's body orientation influence the visual perception of human body postures.
Lopez C; Bachofner C; Mercier M; Blanke O
J Vis; 2009 May; 9(5):1.1-14. PubMed ID: 19757879
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
9. Kinesthetic perception of visually specified axes.
Darling WG; Bartelt R
Exp Brain Res; 2003 Mar; 149(1):40-7. PubMed ID: 12592502
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
10. Does gravity influence the visual line bisection task?
Drakul A; Bockisch CJ; Tarnutzer AA
J Neurophysiol; 2016 Aug; 116(2):629-36. PubMed ID: 27226452
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
11. Geometric cues, reference frames, and the equivalence of experienced-aligned and novel-aligned views in human spatial memory.
Kelly JW; Sjolund LA; Sturz BR
Cognition; 2013 Mar; 126(3):459-74. PubMed ID: 23305700
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
12. Different damping responses explain vertical endpoint error differences between visual conditions.
Hondzinski JM; Soebbing CM; French AE; Winges SA
Exp Brain Res; 2016 Jun; 234(6):1575-87. PubMed ID: 26821319
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
13. Not all memories are the same: Situational context influences spatial recall within one's city of residency.
Meilinger T; Frankenstein J; Simon N; Bülthoff HH; Bresciani JP
Psychon Bull Rev; 2016 Feb; 23(1):246-52. PubMed ID: 26088668
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
14. Multisensory determinants of orientation perception: task-specific sex differences.
Barnett-Cowan M; Dyde RT; Thompson C; Harris LR
Eur J Neurosci; 2010 May; 31(10):1899-907. PubMed ID: 20584195
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
15. Qualitative differences in memory for vista and environmental spaces are caused by opaque borders, not movement or successive presentation.
Meilinger T; Strickrodt M; Bülthoff HH
Cognition; 2016 Oct; 155():77-95. PubMed ID: 27367592
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
16. A coordinate system for visual motion perception.
Darling WG; Pizzimenti MA
Exp Brain Res; 2001 Nov; 141(2):174-83. PubMed ID: 11713629
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
17. Internal reference frames for representation and storage of visual information: the role of gravity.
McIntyre J; Lipshits M; Zaoui M; Berthoz A; Gurfinkel V
Acta Astronaut; 2001; 49(3-10):111-21. PubMed ID: 11669099
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
18. Memory for retinotopic locations is more accurate than memory for spatiotopic locations, even for visually guided reaching.
Shafer-Skelton A; Golomb JD
Psychon Bull Rev; 2018 Aug; 25(4):1388-1398. PubMed ID: 29159799
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
19. Altered visual and haptic verticality perception in posterior cortical atrophy and Alzheimer's disease.
Day BL; Ocal D; Peters A; Bancroft MJ; Cash D; Kaski D; Crutch SJ; Yong KXX
J Physiol; 2022 Jan; 600(2):373-391. PubMed ID: 34841531
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
20. The subjective visual vertical and the perceptual upright.
Dyde RT; Jenkin MR; Harris LR
Exp Brain Res; 2006 Sep; 173(4):612-22. PubMed ID: 16550392
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
[Next] [New Search]
