These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

156 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 30050221)

  • 21. Dentists' restorative decision-making and implications for an 'amalgamless' profession. Part 2: a qualitative study.
    Alexander G; Hopcraft MS; Tyas MJ; Wong RH
    Aust Dent J; 2014 Dec; 59(4):420-31. PubMed ID: 25091200
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 22. Attitudes of dentists and interns in Riyadh to the use of dental amalgam.
    Alkhudhairy F
    BMC Res Notes; 2016 Nov; 9(1):488. PubMed ID: 27855718
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 23. The Use of Restorative Materials in Primary Molars among Pediatric Dentists in Israel.
    Blumer S; Peretz B; Ratson T
    J Clin Pediatr Dent; 2017; 41(3):199-203. PubMed ID: 28422598
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 24. Repair of defective composite restorations. A questionnaire study among dentists in the Public Dental Service in Norway.
    Staxrud F; Tveit AB; Rukke HV; Kopperud SE
    J Dent; 2016 Sep; 52():50-4. PubMed ID: 27421988
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 25. Dentists' restorative decision-making and implications for an 'amalgamless' profession. Part 5: knowledge factors.
    Alexander G; Hopcraft MS; Tyas MJ; Wong R
    Aust Dent J; 2017 Dec; 62(4):440-452. PubMed ID: 28542834
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 26. Nordic dentists' knowledge and attitudes on dental amalgam from health and environmental perspectives.
    Ylinen K; Löfroth G
    Acta Odontol Scand; 2002 Oct; 60(5):315-20. PubMed ID: 12418724
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 27. Direct Posterior Restorations: A 13-Year Survey of Teaching Trends and Use of Materials.
    Zabrovsky A; Mahmoud R; Beyth N; Ben-Gal G
    Oper Dent; 2018; 43(6):E273-E279. PubMed ID: 30216130
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 28. Direct restorative material use of selected practitioners in the United Kingdom.
    Brunton PA; Hickel R; Wilson NH
    Prim Dent Care; 2002 Oct; 9(4):133-7. PubMed ID: 12483789
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 29. Restorative treatment decisions on occlusal caries in Scandinavia.
    Espelid I; Tveit AB; Mejàre I; Sundberg H; Hallonsten AL
    Acta Odontol Scand; 2001 Feb; 59(1):21-7. PubMed ID: 11318041
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 30. The Use of Restorative Materials in Primary Molars among Pediatric Dentists in Israel.
    Blumer S; Peretz B; Ratson T
    J Clin Pediatr Dent; 2017; 41(6):424-428. PubMed ID: 28937890
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 31. Substantial variation in the provision of sedation for primary dental care.
    Robb ND
    Br Dent J; 1998 Apr; 184(8):386. PubMed ID: 9604506
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 32. [What efforts are being made by dentists in the Flemish region for the limiting of amalgam rejection? A study conducted on a representative sample of 373 Flemish dentists on the subject of amalgam waste: extent of the problem, waste management and foreseeable solutions].
    Deliens L; De Deyn B
    Rev Belge Med Dent (1984); 1993; 48(4):35-43. PubMed ID: 8090960
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 33. The prescription and relative outcomes of different materials used in general dental practice in the north west region of England to restore the primary dentition.
    Milsom KM; Tickle M; Blinkhorn A
    J Dent; 2002; 30(2-3):77-82. PubMed ID: 12381406
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 34. Economic impact of regulating the use of amalgam restorations.
    Beazoglou T; Eklund S; Heffley D; Meiers J; Brown LJ; Bailit H
    Public Health Rep; 2007; 122(5):657-63. PubMed ID: 17877313
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 35. Community dental officers' use and knowledge of restorative techniques for primary molars: an audit of two Trusts in Wales.
    Maggs-Rapport FL; Treasure ET; Chadwick BL
    Int J Paediatr Dent; 2000 Jun; 10(2):133-9. PubMed ID: 11310098
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 36. Informed consent: direct posterior composite versus amalgam.
    Dlugokinski M; Browning WD
    J Am Coll Dent; 2001; 68(2):31-40. PubMed ID: 11764638
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 37. Finnish dentists' perceptions of the longevity of direct dental restorations.
    Palotie U; Vehkalahti MM
    Acta Odontol Scand; 2009; 67(1):44-9. PubMed ID: 19039686
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 38. Amalgam safety and dentists' attitude: a survey among a Subpopulation of Nigerian dentists.
    Udoye C; Aguwa E
    Oper Dent; 2008; 33(4):467-71. PubMed ID: 18666507
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 39. Dentists' molar restoration choices and longevity: a web-based survey.
    Rosenstiel SF; Land MF; Rashid RG
    J Prosthet Dent; 2004 Apr; 91(4):363-7. PubMed ID: 15116038
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 40. Cost implications of differences in dentists' restorative treatment decisions.
    Shugars DA; Bader JD
    J Public Health Dent; 1996; 56(4):219-22. PubMed ID: 8906706
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Previous]   [Next]    [New Search]
    of 8.