BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

233 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 30051905)

  • 1. Robust estimation of the hierarchical model for responses and response times.
    Ranger J; Wolgast A; Kuhn JT
    Br J Math Stat Psychol; 2019 Feb; 72(1):83-107. PubMed ID: 30051905
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. Minimum Distance Estimation of Multidimensional Diffusion-Based Item Response Theory Models.
    Ranger J; Kuhn JT; Szardenings C
    Multivariate Behav Res; 2020; 55(6):941-957. PubMed ID: 32019358
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. Limited information estimation of the diffusion-based item response theory model for responses and response times.
    Ranger J; Kuhn JT; Szardenings C
    Br J Math Stat Psychol; 2016 May; 69(2):122-38. PubMed ID: 26853083
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. A mixture hierarchical model for response times and response accuracy.
    Wang C; Xu G
    Br J Math Stat Psychol; 2015 Nov; 68(3):456-77. PubMed ID: 25873487
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. The robust estimation of examinee ability based on the four-parameter logistic model when guessing and carelessness responses exist.
    Jian X; Buyun D; Yuanping D
    PLoS One; 2021; 16(4):e0250268. PubMed ID: 33914784
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. A mixture model for responses and response times with a higher-order ability structure to detect rapid guessing behaviour.
    Lu J; Wang C; Zhang J; Tao J
    Br J Math Stat Psychol; 2020 May; 73(2):261-288. PubMed ID: 31385609
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. Joint Maximum Likelihood Estimation for High-Dimensional Exploratory Item Factor Analysis.
    Chen Y; Li X; Zhang S
    Psychometrika; 2019 Mar; 84(1):124-146. PubMed ID: 30456747
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. Information matrix estimation procedures for cognitive diagnostic models.
    Liu Y; Xin T; Andersson B; Tian W
    Br J Math Stat Psychol; 2019 Feb; 72(1):18-37. PubMed ID: 29508383
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. A semi-parametric within-subject mixture approach to the analyses of responses and response times.
    Molenaar D; Bolsinova M; Vermunt JK
    Br J Math Stat Psychol; 2018 May; 71(2):205-228. PubMed ID: 29044460
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. Robust maximum marginal likelihood (RMML) estimation for item response theory models.
    Hong MR; Cheng Y
    Behav Res Methods; 2019 Apr; 51(2):573-588. PubMed ID: 30350024
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. Marginal likelihood inference for a model for item responses and response times.
    Glas CA; van der Linden WJ
    Br J Math Stat Psychol; 2010 Nov; 63(Pt 3):603-26. PubMed ID: 20109271
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. A comparison of item response models for accuracy and speed of item responses with applications to adaptive testing.
    van Rijn PW; Ali US
    Br J Math Stat Psychol; 2017 May; 70(2):317-345. PubMed ID: 28474769
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. A Two-Stage Approach to Differentiating Normal and Aberrant Behavior in Computer Based Testing.
    Wang C; Xu G; Shang Z
    Psychometrika; 2018 Mar; 83(1):223-254. PubMed ID: 27796763
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. Modeling Differences Between Response Times of Correct and Incorrect Responses.
    Bolsinova M; Tijmstra J
    Psychometrika; 2019 Dec; 84(4):1018-1046. PubMed ID: 31463656
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. Robust model fitting for the non linear structural equation model under normal theory.
    Xia YM; Song XY; Lee SY
    Br J Math Stat Psychol; 2009 Nov; 62(Pt 3):529-68. PubMed ID: 19040790
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. A targeted maximum likelihood estimator of a causal effect on a bounded continuous outcome.
    Gruber S; van der Laan MJ
    Int J Biostat; 2010; 6(1):Article 26. PubMed ID: 21731529
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. Improving precision of ability estimation: Getting more from response times.
    Bolsinova M; Tijmstra J
    Br J Math Stat Psychol; 2018 Feb; 71(1):13-38. PubMed ID: 28635139
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. Shrinkage estimation of the three-parameter logistic model.
    Battauz M; Bellio R
    Br J Math Stat Psychol; 2021 Nov; 74(3):591-609. PubMed ID: 33734439
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. A Generalized Speed-Accuracy Response Model for Dichotomous Items.
    van Rijn PW; Ali US
    Psychometrika; 2018 Mar; 83(1):109-131. PubMed ID: 29164449
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. Using a Response Time-Based Expected A Posteriori Estimator to Control for Differential Speededness in Computerized Adaptive Test.
    Kern JL; Choe E
    Appl Psychol Meas; 2021 Jul; 45(5):361-385. PubMed ID: 34565941
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 12.