105 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 30053277)
1. A COMPARISON OF BETA SKIN DOSES CALCULATED WITH VARSKIN 5.35.3 AND MCNP5.
Dubeau J; Hakmana Witharana SS; Sun J; Heinmiller BE; Chase WJ
Radiat Prot Dosimetry; 2018 Dec; 182(4):502-507. PubMed ID: 30053277
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
2. Verification of the VARSKIN beta skin dose calculation computer code.
Sherbini S; DeCicco J; Gray AT; Struckmeyer R
Health Phys; 2008 Jun; 94(6):527-38. PubMed ID: 18469586
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
3. Validation of the photon dose calculation model in the VARSKIN 4 skin dose computer code.
Sherbini S; Decicco J; Struckmeyer R; Saba M; Bush-Goddard S
Health Phys; 2012 Dec; 103(6):763-9. PubMed ID: 23111523
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
4. Skin dose from radionuclide contamination on clothing.
Taylor DC; Hussein EM; Yuen PS
Health Phys; 1997 Jun; 72(6):835-41. PubMed ID: 9169925
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
5. Evaluation of skin absorbed doses during manipulation of radioactive sources: a comparison between the VARSKIN code and Monte Carlo simulations.
Amato E; Italiano A
J Radiol Prot; 2018 Mar; 38(1):262-272. PubMed ID: 29235449
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
6. The new VARSKIN 4 photon skin dosimetry model.
Hamby DM; Lodwick CJ; Palmer TS; Reese SR; Higley KA; Caffrey JA; Sherbini S; Saba M; Bush-Goddard SP
Radiat Prot Dosimetry; 2013; 154(3):356-63. PubMed ID: 23070483
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
7. Considerations for applying VARSKIN mod 2 to skin dose calculations averaged over 10 cm2.
Durham JS
Health Phys; 2004 Feb; 86(2 Suppl):S11-4. PubMed ID: 14744063
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
8. Monte Carlo calculation and silicon detector measurement of the hot particle dose.
Chung MH; Levine SH; Jester WA
Health Phys; 1991 Dec; 61(6):843-8. PubMed ID: 1955329
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
9. PERFORMANCE OF THE VARSKIN 5 (v5.3) ELECTRON DOSIMETRY MODEL.
Anspach LJ; Hamby DM
Radiat Prot Dosimetry; 2018 Oct; 181(2):111-119. PubMed ID: 29378064
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
10. Spectrum and Yield to Dose Conversion Coefficients for Beta Skin Doses Linked to the Q System.
Frosio T; Bertreix P; Köster U; Theis C; Magistris M
Health Phys; 2019 May; 116(5):607-618. PubMed ID: 30908318
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
11. Optimising cylinder model dimensions for VARSKIN to simulate a droplet of radionuclide skin contamination using Geant4 Monte Carlo code.
James G; O'Brien J; Thomson B
Nucl Med Commun; 2023 May; 44(5):366-374. PubMed ID: 36897054
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
12. Skin dose calculations for uranium fuel particles below 500 microns in diameter.
Pöllänen R; Toivonen H
Health Phys; 1995 Mar; 68(3):401-5. PubMed ID: 7860313
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
13. Gamma and Beta Absorbed Dose Conversion Coefficients in the Range from 10 keV to 10 MeV for Accidental Exposures From Point Sources Placed in Clothing in Proximity to the Body.
Owens A; Bertelli L; Brandl A
Health Phys; 2018 Aug; 115(2):281-294. PubMed ID: 29957689
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
14. Skin dose contamination conversion coefficients. Benchmark with three simulation codes.
Frosio T; Bertreix P; Menaa N; Thomas S; Eberhardt H; Endres J
J Radiol Prot; 2022 Jan; 42(1):. PubMed ID: 34801994
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
15. Contamination skin doses and attenuation of radiation by clothing.
Napier ID; Locke J; Grubb SR; Picton DJ
J Radiol Prot; 2010 Dec; 30(4):717-33. PubMed ID: 21149936
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
16. CALCULATION OF SKIN DOSE DUE TO BETA CONTAMINATION USING THE NEW QUANTITY OF THE ICRP 116: THE 'LOCAL SKIN DOSE'.
Bourgois L; Ménard S; Comte N
Radiat Prot Dosimetry; 2017 Nov; 176(4):365-379. PubMed ID: 28338860
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
17. Radiation protection from external exposure to radionuclides: A Monte Carlo data handbook.
Amato E; Italiano A; Auditore L; Baldari S
Phys Med; 2018 Feb; 46():160-167. PubMed ID: 29519404
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
18. Monte Carlo dose voxel kernel calculations of beta-emitting and Auger-emitting radionuclides for internal dosimetry: A comparison between EGSnrcMP and EGS4.
Strigari L; Menghi E; D'Andrea M; Benassi M
Med Phys; 2006 Sep; 33(9):3383-9. PubMed ID: 17022234
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
19. A dose point kernel database using GATE Monte Carlo simulation toolkit for nuclear medicine applications: comparison with other Monte Carlo codes.
Papadimitroulas P; Loudos G; Nikiforidis GC; Kagadis GC
Med Phys; 2012 Aug; 39(8):5238-47. PubMed ID: 22894448
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
20. Determining the effects of microsphere and surrounding material composition on (90)Y dose kernels using egsnrc and mcnp5.
Paxton AB; Davis SD; Dewerd LA
Med Phys; 2012 Mar; 39(3):1424-34. PubMed ID: 22380375
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
[Next] [New Search]
