These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

143 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 30055118)

  • 1. Multimodel ensembles improve predictions of crop-environment-management interactions.
    Wallach D; Martre P; Liu B; Asseng S; Ewert F; Thorburn PJ; van Ittersum M; Aggarwal PK; Ahmed M; Basso B; Biernath C; Cammarano D; Challinor AJ; De Sanctis G; Dumont B; Eyshi Rezaei E; Fereres E; Fitzgerald GJ; Gao Y; Garcia-Vila M; Gayler S; Girousse C; Hoogenboom G; Horan H; Izaurralde RC; Jones CD; Kassie BT; Kersebaum KC; Klein C; Koehler AK; Maiorano A; Minoli S; Müller C; Naresh Kumar S; Nendel C; O'Leary GJ; Palosuo T; Priesack E; Ripoche D; Rötter RP; Semenov MA; Stöckle C; Stratonovitch P; Streck T; Supit I; Tao F; Wolf J; Zhang Z
    Glob Chang Biol; 2018 Nov; 24(11):5072-5083. PubMed ID: 30055118
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. Multimodel ensembles of wheat growth: many models are better than one.
    Martre P; Wallach D; Asseng S; Ewert F; Jones JW; Rötter RP; Boote KJ; Ruane AC; Thorburn PJ; Cammarano D; Hatfield JL; Rosenzweig C; Aggarwal PK; Angulo C; Basso B; Bertuzzi P; Biernath C; Brisson N; Challinor AJ; Doltra J; Gayler S; Goldberg R; Grant RF; Heng L; Hooker J; Hunt LA; Ingwersen J; Izaurralde RC; Kersebaum KC; Müller C; Kumar SN; Nendel C; O'leary G; Olesen JE; Osborne TM; Palosuo T; Priesack E; Ripoche D; Semenov MA; Shcherbak I; Steduto P; Stöckle CO; Stratonovitch P; Streck T; Supit I; Tao F; Travasso M; Waha K; White JW; Wolf J
    Glob Chang Biol; 2015 Feb; 21(2):911-25. PubMed ID: 25330243
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. Impact of climate change on crop yield and role of model for achieving food security.
    Kumar M
    Environ Monit Assess; 2016 Aug; 188(8):465. PubMed ID: 27418072
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. Contribution of crop model structure, parameters and climate projections to uncertainty in climate change impact assessments.
    Tao F; Rötter RP; Palosuo T; Gregorio Hernández Díaz-Ambrona C; Mínguez MI; Semenov MA; Kersebaum KC; Nendel C; Specka X; Hoffmann H; Ewert F; Dambreville A; Martre P; Rodríguez L; Ruiz-Ramos M; Gaiser T; Höhn JG; Salo T; Ferrise R; Bindi M; Cammarano D; Schulman AH
    Glob Chang Biol; 2018 Mar; 24(3):1291-1307. PubMed ID: 29245185
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. Deterministic skill of ENSO predictions from the North American Multimodel Ensemble.
    Barnston AG; Tippett MK; Ranganathan M; L'Heureux ML
    Clim Dyn; 2019; 53(12):7215-7234. PubMed ID: 31929685
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. Lessons from climate modeling on the design and use of ensembles for crop modeling.
    Wallach D; Mearns LO; Ruane AC; Rötter RP; Asseng S
    Clim Change; 2016; 139(3):551-564. PubMed ID: 32355375
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. Implications of crop model ensemble size and composition for estimates of adaptation effects and agreement of recommendations.
    Rodríguez A; Ruiz-Ramos M; Palosuo T; Carter TR; Fronzek S; Lorite IJ; Ferrise R; Pirttioja N; Bindi M; Baranowski P; Buis S; Cammarano D; Chen Y; Dumont B; Ewert F; Gaiser T; Hlavinka P; Hoffmann H; Höhn JG; Jurecka F; Kersebaum KC; Krzyszczak J; Lana M; Mechiche-Alami A; Minet J; Montesino M; Nendel C; Porter JR; Ruget F; Semenov MA; Steinmetz Z; Stratonovitch P; Supit I; Tao F; Trnka M; de Wit A; Rötter RP
    Agric For Meteorol; 2019 Jan; 264():351-362. PubMed ID: 31007324
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. A potato model intercomparison across varying climates and productivity levels.
    Fleisher DH; Condori B; Quiroz R; Alva A; Asseng S; Barreda C; Bindi M; Boote KJ; Ferrise R; Franke AC; Govindakrishnan PM; Harahagazwe D; Hoogenboom G; Naresh Kumar S; Merante P; Nendel C; Olesen JE; Parker PS; Raes D; Raymundo R; Ruane AC; Stockle C; Supit I; Vanuytrecht E; Wolf J; Woli P
    Glob Chang Biol; 2017 Mar; 23(3):1258-1281. PubMed ID: 27387228
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. Novel multimodel ensemble approach to evaluate the sole effect of elevated CO
    Ahmed M; Stöckle CO; Nelson R; Higgins S; Ahmad S; Raza MA
    Sci Rep; 2019 May; 9(1):7813. PubMed ID: 31127159
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. Forecasting Corn Yield With Machine Learning Ensembles.
    Shahhosseini M; Hu G; Archontoulis SV
    Front Plant Sci; 2020; 11():1120. PubMed ID: 32849688
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. SWAT-MODSIM-PSO optimization of multi-crop planning in the Karkheh River Basin, Iran, under the impacts of climate change.
    Fereidoon M; Koch M
    Sci Total Environ; 2018 Jul; 630():502-516. PubMed ID: 29486443
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. Projected climate impacts to South African maize and wheat production in 2055: a comparison of empirical and mechanistic modeling approaches.
    Estes LD; Beukes H; Bradley BA; Debats SR; Oppenheimer M; Ruane AC; Schulze R; Tadross M
    Glob Chang Biol; 2013 Dec; 19(12):3762-74. PubMed ID: 23864352
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. Evaluation of MJO Predictive Skill in Multiphysics and Multimodel Global Ensembles.
    Green BW; Sun S; Bleck R; Benjamin SG; Grell GA
    Mon Weather Rev; 2017 Jul; 145(7):2555-2574. PubMed ID: 32908322
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. Climate variation explains a third of global crop yield variability.
    Ray DK; Gerber JS; MacDonald GK; West PC
    Nat Commun; 2015 Jan; 6():5989. PubMed ID: 25609225
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. Uncertainties in predicting rice yield by current crop models under a wide range of climatic conditions.
    Li T; Hasegawa T; Yin X; Zhu Y; Boote K; Adam M; Bregaglio S; Buis S; Confalonieri R; Fumoto T; Gaydon D; Marcaida M; Nakagawa H; Oriol P; Ruane AC; Ruget F; Singh B; Singh U; Tang L; Tao F; Wilkens P; Yoshida H; Zhang Z; Bouman B
    Glob Chang Biol; 2015 Mar; 21(3):1328-41. PubMed ID: 25294087
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. Advancing the climate data driven crop-modeling studies in the dry areas of Northern Syria and Lebanon: an important first step for assessing impact of future climate.
    Dixit PN; Telleria R
    Sci Total Environ; 2015 Apr; 511():562-75. PubMed ID: 25590537
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. Use of crop simulation modelling to aid ideotype design of future cereal cultivars.
    Rötter RP; Tao F; Höhn JG; Palosuo T
    J Exp Bot; 2015 Jun; 66(12):3463-76. PubMed ID: 25795739
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. Sensitivity and requirement of improvements of four soybean crop simulation models for climate change studies in Southern Brazil.
    Battisti R; Sentelhas PC; Boote KJ
    Int J Biometeorol; 2018 May; 62(5):823-832. PubMed ID: 29196806
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. Projective analysis of staple food crop productivity in adaptation to future climate change in China.
    Zhang Q; Zhang W; Li T; Sun W; Yu Y; Wang G
    Int J Biometeorol; 2017 Aug; 61(8):1445-1460. PubMed ID: 28247124
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. Regional projections of North Indian climate for adaptation studies.
    Mathison C; Wiltshire A; Dimri AP; Falloon P; Jacob D; Kumar P; Moors E; Ridley J; Siderius C; Stoffel M; Yasunari T
    Sci Total Environ; 2013 Dec; 468-469 Suppl():S4-17. PubMed ID: 22633462
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 8.