172 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 30055375)
41. Influence of different self-expanding stent-graft types on remodeling of the aortic neck after endovascular aneurysm repair.
Oberhuber A; Schwarz A; Hoffmann MH; Klass O; Orend KH; Mühling B
J Endovasc Ther; 2010 Dec; 17(6):677-84. PubMed ID: 21142472
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
42. Durability of endovascular infrarenal aneurysm repair: when does late failure occur and why?
Chuter TA
Semin Vasc Surg; 2009 Jun; 22(2):102-10. PubMed ID: 19573750
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
43. Sequential Structural and Fluid Dynamics Analysis of Balloon-Expandable Coronary Stents: A Multivariable Statistical Analysis.
Martin D; Boyle F
Cardiovasc Eng Technol; 2015 Sep; 6(3):314-28. PubMed ID: 26577363
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
44. Estimating the influence of aortic-stent grafts after endovascular aneurysm repair: Are we missing something?
Georgakarakos E
Med Hypotheses; 2016 Dec; 97():26-30. PubMed ID: 27876124
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
45. Virtual evaluation of stent graft deployment: a validated modeling and simulation study.
De Bock S; Iannaccone F; De Santis G; De Beule M; Van Loo D; Devos D; Vermassen F; Segers P; Verhegghe B
J Mech Behav Biomed Mater; 2012 Sep; 13():129-39. PubMed ID: 22842656
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
46. Finite element modeling of a novel self-expanding endovascular stent method in treatment of aortic aneurysms.
Arokiaraj MC; De Santis G; De Beule M; Palacios IF
Sci Rep; 2014 Jan; 4():3630. PubMed ID: 24406869
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
47. Phantom-based experimental validation of fast virtual deployment of self-expandable stents for cerebral aneurysms.
Zhang Q; Meng Z; Zhang Y; Yao K; Liu J; Zhang Y; Jing L; Yang X; Paliwal N; Meng H; Wang S
Biomed Eng Online; 2016 Dec; 15(Suppl 2):125. PubMed ID: 28155680
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
48. A Finite Element-Based Analysis of a Hemodynamics Efficient Flow Stent Suitable for Different Abdominal Aneurysm Shapes.
Nada A; Fakhr MA; El-Wakad MTI; Hassan MA
J Biomech Eng; 2022 Sep; 144(9):. PubMed ID: 35237800
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
49. Deployment of stent grafts in curved aneurysmal arteries: toward a predictive numerical tool.
Perrin D; Demanget N; Badel P; Avril S; Orgéas L; Geindreau C; Albertini JN
Int J Numer Method Biomed Eng; 2015 Jan; 31(1):e02698. PubMed ID: 25399927
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
50. The effect of vessel material properties and pulsatile wall motion on the fixation of a proximal stent of an endovascular graft.
Corbett TJ; Molony DS; Callanan A; McGloughlin TM
Med Eng Phys; 2011 Jan; 33(1):106-11. PubMed ID: 20947409
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
51. Fenestrated stent-grafts for salvage of prior endovascular abdominal aortic aneurysm repair.
Katsargyris A; Yazar O; Oikonomou K; Bekkema F; Tielliu I; Verhoeven EL
Eur J Vasc Endovasc Surg; 2013 Jul; 46(1):49-56. PubMed ID: 23642523
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
52. Fluid-structure interaction analyses of stented abdominal aortic aneurysms.
Kleinstreuer C; Li Z; Farber MA
Annu Rev Biomed Eng; 2007; 9():169-204. PubMed ID: 17362195
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
53. Deep Femoral Vein Reconstruction of the Abdominal Aorta and Adaptation of the Neo-Aortoiliac System Bypass Technique in an Endovascular Era.
Nordanstig J; Törngren K; Smidfelt K; Roos H; Langenskiöld M
Vasc Endovascular Surg; 2019 Jan; 53(1):28-34. PubMed ID: 30231803
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
54. Patient-specific numerical simulation of stent-graft deployment: Validation on three clinical cases.
Perrin D; Badel P; Orgéas L; Geindreau C; Dumenil A; Albertini JN; Avril S
J Biomech; 2015 Jul; 48(10):1868-75. PubMed ID: 25979382
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
55. The quantification of hemodynamic parameters downstream of a Gianturco Zenith stent wire using newtonian and non-newtonian analog fluids in a pulsatile flow environment.
Walker AM; Johnston CR; Rival DE
J Biomech Eng; 2012 Nov; 134(11):111001. PubMed ID: 23387783
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
56. Biomechanical implications of excessive endograft protrusion into the aortic arch after thoracic endovascular repair.
Rinaudo A; Raffa GM; Scardulla F; Pilato M; Scardulla C; Pasta S
Comput Biol Med; 2015 Nov; 66():235-41. PubMed ID: 26433455
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
57. Fluid structure interaction of patient specific abdominal aortic aneurysms: a comparison with solid stress models.
Leung JH; Wright AR; Cheshire N; Crane J; Thom SA; Hughes AD; Xu Y
Biomed Eng Online; 2006 May; 5():33. PubMed ID: 16712729
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
58. Stent graft visualization and planning tool for endovascular surgery using finite element analysis.
von Sachsen S; Senf B; Burgert O; Meixensberger J; Florek HJ; Mohr FW; Etz CD
Int J Comput Assist Radiol Surg; 2014 Jul; 9(4):617-33. PubMed ID: 24170574
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
59. Turbulence significantly increases pressure and fluid shear stress in an aortic aneurysm model under resting and exercise flow conditions.
Khanafer KM; Bull JL; Upchurch GR; Berguer R
Ann Vasc Surg; 2007 Jan; 21(1):67-74. PubMed ID: 17349339
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
60. Enhancement of Mechanical Properties and Testing of Nitinol Stents in Cerebral Aneurysm Simulation Models.
Nam HG; Yoo CM; Baek SM; Kim HK; Shin JH; Hwang MH; Jo GE; Kim KS; Cho JH; Lee SH; Kim HC; Lim CH; Choi H; Sun K
Artif Organs; 2015 Dec; 39(12):E213-26. PubMed ID: 26416549
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
[Previous] [Next] [New Search]
