169 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 30055507)
1. DNA damage response and repair in colorectal cancer: Defects, regulation and therapeutic implications.
Mirza-Aghazadeh-Attari M; Darband SG; Kaviani M; Mihanfar A; Aghazadeh Attari J; Yousefi B; Majidinia M
DNA Repair (Amst); 2018 Sep; 69():34-52. PubMed ID: 30055507
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
2. Interaction between DNA damage response and autophagy in colorectal cancer.
Roshani-Asl E; Mansori B; Mohammadi A; Najafi S; Danesh-Pouya F; Rasmi Y
Gene; 2020 Mar; 730():144323. PubMed ID: 31917230
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
3. DNA damage signaling in response to 5-fluorouracil in three colorectal cancer cell lines with different mismatch repair and TP53 status.
Adamsen BL; Kravik KL; De Angelis PM
Int J Oncol; 2011 Sep; 39(3):673-82. PubMed ID: 21674128
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
4. DNA damage checkpoints and cancer.
Shimada M; Nakanishi M
J Mol Histol; 2006 Sep; 37(5-7):253-60. PubMed ID: 16841236
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
5. DNA damage response: the players, the network and the role in tumor suppression.
Rai R; Peng G; Li K; Lin SY
Cancer Genomics Proteomics; 2007; 4(2):99-106. PubMed ID: 17804872
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
6. [Cell cycle regulation after exposure to ionizing radiation].
Teyssier F; Bay JO; Dionet C; Verrelle P
Bull Cancer; 1999 Apr; 86(4):345-57. PubMed ID: 10341340
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
7. DNA damage-dependent cell cycle checkpoints and genomic stability.
Ishikawa K; Ishii H; Saito T
DNA Cell Biol; 2006 Jul; 25(7):406-11. PubMed ID: 16848682
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
8. Noncoding RNAs in DNA Damage Response: Opportunities for Cancer Therapeutics.
Arjumand W; Asiaf A; Ahmad ST
Methods Mol Biol; 2018; 1699():3-21. PubMed ID: 29086365
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
9. [Dbait: An innovative concept to inhibit DNA repair and treat cancer].
Biau J; Devun F; Verrelle P; Dutreix M
Bull Cancer; 2016 Mar; 103(3):227-35. PubMed ID: 26917468
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
10. DNA damage checkpoint, damage repair, and genome stability.
Liu WF; Yu SS; Chen GJ; Li YZ
Yi Chuan Xue Bao; 2006 May; 33(5):381-90. PubMed ID: 16722332
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
11. LncRNAs in DNA damage response and repair in cancer cells.
Su M; Wang H; Wang W; Wang Y; Ouyang L; Pan C; Xia L; Cao D; Liao Q
Acta Biochim Biophys Sin (Shanghai); 2018 May; 50(5):433-439. PubMed ID: 29554194
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
12. DNA damage response and transcription.
Lagerwerf S; Vrouwe MG; Overmeer RM; Fousteri MI; Mullenders LH
DNA Repair (Amst); 2011 Jul; 10(7):743-50. PubMed ID: 21622031
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
13. DNA damage response and repair in ovarian cancer: Potential targets for therapeutic strategies.
Mirza-Aghazadeh-Attari M; Ostadian C; Saei AA; Mihanfar A; Darband SG; Sadighparvar S; Kaviani M; Samadi Kafil H; Yousefi B; Majidinia M
DNA Repair (Amst); 2019 Aug; 80():59-84. PubMed ID: 31279973
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
14. Mutations in DNA mismatch repair genes: implications for DNA damage signaling and drug sensitivity (review).
Fedier A; Fink D
Int J Oncol; 2004 Apr; 24(4):1039-47. PubMed ID: 15010846
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
15. Aberrant BLM cytoplasmic expression associates with DNA damage stress and hypersensitivity to DNA-damaging agents in colorectal cancer.
Votino C; Laudanna C; Parcesepe P; Giordano G; Remo A; Manfrin E; Pancione M
J Gastroenterol; 2017 Mar; 52(3):327-340. PubMed ID: 27169843
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
16. Ataxia-telangiectasia and cellular responses to DNA damage.
Meyn MS
Cancer Res; 1995 Dec; 55(24):5991-6001. PubMed ID: 8521380
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
17. Dealing with DNA damage: relationships between checkpoint and repair pathways.
Warmerdam DO; Kanaar R
Mutat Res; 2010; 704(1-3):2-11. PubMed ID: 20006736
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
18. Yeast checkpoint controls and relevance to cancer.
Weinert T
Cancer Surv; 1997; 29():109-32. PubMed ID: 9338099
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
19. Harnessing the complexity of DNA-damage response pathways to improve cancer treatment outcomes.
Al-Ejeh F; Kumar R; Wiegmans A; Lakhani SR; Brown MP; Khanna KK
Oncogene; 2010 Nov; 29(46):6085-98. PubMed ID: 20818418
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
20. Causes and consequences of the DNA damage response.
Nussenzweig A
Cell Cycle; 2007 Oct; 6(19):2339-40. PubMed ID: 17914283
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
[Next] [New Search]
