These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

117 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 30056198)

  • 1. All-Resolutions Inference for brain imaging.
    Rosenblatt JD; Finos L; Weeda WD; Solari A; Goeman JJ
    Neuroimage; 2018 Nov; 181():786-796. PubMed ID: 30056198
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. Intracortical smoothing of small-voxel fMRI data can provide increased detection power without spatial resolution losses compared to conventional large-voxel fMRI data.
    Blazejewska AI; Fischl B; Wald LL; Polimeni JR
    Neuroimage; 2019 Apr; 189():601-614. PubMed ID: 30690157
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. Cluster-level statistical inference in fMRI datasets: The unexpected behavior of random fields in high dimensions.
    Bansal R; Peterson BS
    Magn Reson Imaging; 2018 Jun; 49():101-115. PubMed ID: 29408478
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. Permutation and parametric tests for effect sizes in voxel-based morphometry of gray matter volume in brain structural MRI.
    Dickie DA; Mikhael S; Job DE; Wardlaw JM; Laidlaw DH; Bastin ME
    Magn Reson Imaging; 2015 Dec; 33(10):1299-1305. PubMed ID: 26253778
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. Notip: Non-parametric true discovery proportion control for brain imaging.
    Blain A; Thirion B; Neuvial P
    Neuroimage; 2022 Oct; 260():119492. PubMed ID: 35870698
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. Cluster mass inference via random field theory.
    Zhang H; Nichols TE; Johnson TD
    Neuroimage; 2009 Jan; 44(1):51-61. PubMed ID: 18805493
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. Adjusting the neuroimaging statistical inferences for nonstationarity.
    Salimi-Khorshidi G; Smith SM; Nichols TE
    Med Image Comput Comput Assist Interv; 2009; 12(Pt 1):992-9. PubMed ID: 20426085
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. Detecting activations in PET and fMRI: levels of inference and power.
    Friston KJ; Holmes A; Poline JB; Price CJ; Frith CD
    Neuroimage; 1996 Dec; 4(3 Pt 1):223-35. PubMed ID: 9345513
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. An evaluation of spatial thresholding techniques in fMRI analysis.
    Logan BR; Geliazkova MP; Rowe DB
    Hum Brain Mapp; 2008 Dec; 29(12):1379-89. PubMed ID: 18064589
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. An integrated cluster-wise significance measure for fMRI analysis.
    Ge Y; Chen G; Waltz JA; Hong LE; Kochunov P; Chen S
    Hum Brain Mapp; 2022 Jun; 43(8):2444-2459. PubMed ID: 35233859
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. Optimization of functional MRI for detection, decoding and high-resolution imaging of the response patterns of cortical columns.
    Chaimow D; Uğurbil K; Shmuel A
    Neuroimage; 2018 Jan; 164():67-99. PubMed ID: 28461061
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. A non-parametric statistical test to compare clusters with applications in functional magnetic resonance imaging data.
    Fujita A; Takahashi DY; Patriota AG; Sato JR
    Stat Med; 2014 Dec; 33(28):4949-62. PubMed ID: 25185759
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. Statistical inference and multiple testing correction in classification-based multi-voxel pattern analysis (MVPA): random permutations and cluster size control.
    Stelzer J; Chen Y; Turner R
    Neuroimage; 2013 Jan; 65():69-82. PubMed ID: 23041526
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. Accounting for Non-Gaussian Sources of Spatial Correlation in Parametric Functional Magnetic Resonance Imaging Paradigms II: A Method to Obtain First-Level Analysis Residuals with Uniform and Gaussian Spatial Autocorrelation Function and Independent and Identically Distributed Time-Series.
    Gopinath K; Krishnamurthy V; Lacey S; Sathian K
    Brain Connect; 2018 Feb; 8(1):10-21. PubMed ID: 29161884
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. Spatial correspondence between functional MRI (fMRI) activations and cortical current density maps of event-related potentials (ERP): a study with four tasks.
    Minati L; Rosazza C; Zucca I; D'Incerti L; Scaioli V; Bruzzone MG
    Brain Topogr; 2008 Dec; 21(2):112-27. PubMed ID: 18758934
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. Comparison of a non-stationary voxelation-corrected cluster-size test with TFCE for group-Level MRI inference.
    Li H; Nickerson LD; Nichols TE; Gao JH
    Hum Brain Mapp; 2017 Mar; 38(3):1269-1280. PubMed ID: 27785843
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. Permutation-based true discovery proportions for functional magnetic resonance imaging cluster analysis.
    Andreella A; Hemerik J; Finos L; Weeda W; Goeman J
    Stat Med; 2023 Jun; 42(14):2311-2340. PubMed ID: 37259808
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. Hidden Markov event sequence models: toward unsupervised functional MRI brain mapping.
    Faisan S; Thoraval L; Armspach JP; Foucher JR; Metz-Lutz MN; Heitz F
    Acad Radiol; 2005 Jan; 12(1):25-36. PubMed ID: 15691723
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. Cluster-level statistical inference in fMRI datasets: The unexpected behavior of random fields in high dimensions.
    Bansal R; Peterson BS
    Magn Reson Imaging; 2022 Apr; 87():19-31. PubMed ID: 34920042
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. Cluster-based analysis of FMRI data.
    Heller R; Stanley D; Yekutieli D; Rubin N; Benjamini Y
    Neuroimage; 2006 Nov; 33(2):599-608. PubMed ID: 16952467
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 6.