275 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 30056308)
1. Simulated cuspal deflection and flexural properties of high viscosity bulk-fill and conventional resin composites.
Tsujimoto A; Nagura Y; Barkmeier WW; Watanabe H; Johnson WW; Takamizawa T; Latta MA; Miyazaki M
J Mech Behav Biomed Mater; 2018 Nov; 87():111-118. PubMed ID: 30056308
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
2. Simulated Cuspal Deflection and Flexural Properties of Bulk-Fill and Conventional Flowable Resin Composites.
Shimatani Y; Tsujimoto A; Barkmeier WW; Fischer NG; Nagura Y; Takamizawa T; Latta MA; Miyazaki M
Oper Dent; 2020 Sep; 45(5):537-546. PubMed ID: 32216724
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
3. Effect of Layering Techniques on Polymerization Shrinkage Stress of High- and Low-viscosity Bulk-fill Resins.
Tsujimoto A; Jurado CA; Barkmeier WW; Sayed ME; Takamizawa T; Latta MA; Miyazaki M; Garcia-Godoy F
Oper Dent; 2020 Nov; 45(6):655-663. PubMed ID: 32674133
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
4. Comparison of premolar cuspal deflection in bulk or in incremental composite restoration methods.
Kim ME; Park SH
Oper Dent; 2011; 36(3):326-34. PubMed ID: 21827222
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
5. Cuspal Deflection in Premolar Teeth Restored with Bulk-Fill Resin-Based Composite Materials.
Elsharkasi MM; Platt JA; Cook NB; Yassen GH; Matis BA
Oper Dent; 2018; 43(1):E1-E9. PubMed ID: 29284100
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
6. Effect of layering methods, composite type, and flowable liner on the polymerization shrinkage stress of light cured composites.
Kwon Y; Ferracane J; Lee IB
Dent Mater; 2012 Jul; 28(7):801-9. PubMed ID: 22575738
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
7. Flexural Strength of Conventional or Bulk-fill Resin Composite Repaired with High- or Low-viscosity Restorative Materials.
Foscarini AV; Barros LS; Turssi CP; França F; Basting RT; Vieira WF
Oper Dent; 2023 Nov; 48(6):677-688. PubMed ID: 37881103
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
8. Mechanical properties, shrinkage stress, cuspal strain and fracture resistance of molars restored with bulk-fill composites and incremental filling technique.
Rosatto CM; Bicalho AA; Veríssimo C; Bragança GF; Rodrigues MP; Tantbirojn D; Versluis A; Soares CJ
J Dent; 2015 Dec; 43(12):1519-28. PubMed ID: 26449641
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
9. Implications of resin-based composite (RBC) restoration on cuspal deflection and microleakage score in molar teeth: Placement protocol and restorative material.
McHugh LEJ; Politi I; Al-Fodeh RS; Fleming GJP
Dent Mater; 2017 Sep; 33(9):e329-e335. PubMed ID: 28688735
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
10. Cuspal Deflection of Premolars Restored with Bulk-Fill Composite Resins.
Behery H; El-Mowafy O; El-Badrawy W; Saleh B; Nabih S
J Esthet Restor Dent; 2016; 28(2):122-30. PubMed ID: 26892364
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
11. Volumetric Cuspal Deflection of Premolars Restored With Different Paste-like Bulk-fill Resin Composites Evaluated by Microcomputed Tomography.
Demirel G; Baltacioglu IH; Kolsuz ME; Ocak M; Bilecenoglu B; Orhan K
Oper Dent; 2020; 45(2):143-150. PubMed ID: 31283421
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
12. Bulk fill restoratives: to cap or not to cap--that is the question?
Tomaszewska IM; Kearns JO; Ilie N; Fleming GJ
J Dent; 2015 Mar; 43(3):309-16. PubMed ID: 25625673
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
13. Cuspal Deflection and Temperature Rise of MOD Cavities Restored through the Bulk-Fill and Incremental Layering Techniques Using Flowable and Packable Bulk-Fill Composites.
Santis R; Lodato V; Gallicchio V; Prisco D; Riccitiello F; Rengo S; Rengo C
Materials (Basel); 2020 Dec; 13(24):. PubMed ID: 33322480
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
14. Influence of the Compliance and Layering Method on the Wall Deflection of Simulated Cavities in Bulk-fill Composite Restoration.
Kim YJ; Kim R; Ferracane JL; Lee IB
Oper Dent; 2016; 41(6):e183-e194. PubMed ID: 27820696
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
15. Assessment of cuspal deflection and volumetric shrinkage of different bulk fill composites using non-contact phase microscopy and micro-computed tomography.
Prager M; Pierce M; Atria PJ; Sampaio C; Cáceres E; Wolff M; Giannini M; Hirata R
Dent Mater J; 2018 Jun; 37(3):393-399. PubMed ID: 29375091
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
16. Depth of cure, flexural properties and volumetric shrinkage of low and high viscosity bulk-fill giomers and resin composites.
Tsujimoto A; Barkmeier WW; Takamizawa T; Latta MA; Miyazaki M
Dent Mater J; 2017 Mar; 36(2):205-213. PubMed ID: 28154317
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
17. Mechanical performance of a conventional resin composite and its bulk-fill restorative counterpart after long-term accelerated aging.
Naser Alavi F; Ghavami-Lahiji M; Habibi P
Dent Med Probl; 2023; 60(4):641-647. PubMed ID: 38127461
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
18. Comparative Assessment of Cuspal Deflection in Premolars Restored with Bulk-Fill and Conventional Composite Resins.
Yarmohammadi E; Kasraei S; Sadeghi Y
Front Dent; 2019; 16(6):407-414. PubMed ID: 33089241
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
19. Comparison of Polymerization Shrinkage, Physical Properties, and Marginal Adaptation of Flowable and Restorative Bulk Fill Resin-Based Composites.
Jung JH; Park SH
Oper Dent; 2017; 42(4):375-386. PubMed ID: 28402737
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
20. Modification of the restoration protocol for resin-based composite (RBC) restoratives (conventional and bulk fill) on cuspal movement and microleakage score in molar teeth.
Politi I; McHugh LEJ; Al-Fodeh RS; Fleming GJP
Dent Mater; 2018 Sep; 34(9):1271-1277. PubMed ID: 29857989
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
[Next] [New Search]
