200 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 30056502)
1. Mock Juror Perceptions of Child Witnesses on the Autism Spectrum: The Impact of Providing Diagnostic Labels and Information About Autism.
Crane L; Wilcock R; Maras KL; Chui W; Marti-Sanchez C; Henry LA
J Autism Dev Disord; 2020 May; 50(5):1509-1519. PubMed ID: 30056502
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
2. Mock Juror Perceptions of Credibility and Culpability in an Autistic Defendant.
Maras K; Marshall I; Sands C
J Autism Dev Disord; 2019 Mar; 49(3):996-1010. PubMed ID: 30382444
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
3. The impact of developmental language disorder in a defendant's description on mock jurors' perceptions and judgements.
Hobson HM; Woodley J; Gamblen S; Brackely J; O'Neill F; Miles D; Westwood C
Int J Lang Commun Disord; 2023 Jan; 58(1):189-205. PubMed ID: 36087284
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
4. From the shadows into the light: How pretrial publicity and deliberation affect mock jurors' decisions, impressions, and memory.
Ruva CL; Guenther CC
Law Hum Behav; 2015 Jun; 39(3):294-310. PubMed ID: 25495716
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
5. Impact of Evidence Type and Judicial Warning on Juror Perceptions of Global and Specific Witness Evidence.
Wheatcroft JM; Keogan H
J Psychol; 2017 Apr; 151(3):247-267. PubMed ID: 27982750
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
6. Attorney Questions Predict Jury-eligible Adult Assessments of Attorneys, Child Witnesses, and Defendant Guilt.
Mugno AP; Klemfuss JZ; Lyon TD
Behav Sci Law; 2016 Jan; 34(1):178-99. PubMed ID: 26932420
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
7. Juror perceptions of child eyewitness testimony in a sexual abuse trial.
Holcomb MJ; Jacquin KM
J Child Sex Abus; 2007; 16(2):79-95. PubMed ID: 17895233
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
8. Impact of defense-only and opposing eyewitness experts on juror judgments.
Devenport JL; Cutler BL
Law Hum Behav; 2004 Oct; 28(5):569-76. PubMed ID: 15638210
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
9. Race, witness credibility, and jury deliberation in a simulated drug trafficking trial.
Shaw EV; Lynch M; Laguna S; Frenda SJ
Law Hum Behav; 2021 Jun; 45(3):215-228. PubMed ID: 34351204
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
10. Eyewitness confidence and mock juror decisions of guilt: A meta-analytic review.
Slane CR; Dodson CS
Law Hum Behav; 2022 Feb; 46(1):45-66. PubMed ID: 35073115
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
11. The emotional child witness: effects on juror decision-making.
Cooper A; Quas JA; Cleveland KC
Behav Sci Law; 2014; 32(6):813-28. PubMed ID: 25537438
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
12. Juror decision-making in cases of rape involving high functioning Autistic persons.
Devine K; Mojtahedi D
Int J Law Psychiatry; 2021; 77():101714. PubMed ID: 34062383
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
13. Factors that Influence Mock Jurors' Perceptions of Child Credibility.
Call AA; Wingrove T
J Child Sex Abus; 2022; 31(6):726-742. PubMed ID: 35833559
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
14. Mock-juror evaluations of traditional and ratings-based eyewitness identification evidence.
Sauer JD; Palmer MA; Brewer N
Law Hum Behav; 2017 Aug; 41(4):375-384. PubMed ID: 28191988
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
15. Keep your bias to yourself: How deliberating with differently biased others affects mock-jurors' guilt decisions, perceptions of the defendant, memories, and evidence interpretation.
Ruva CL; Guenther CC
Law Hum Behav; 2017 Oct; 41(5):478-493. PubMed ID: 28714733
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
16. Face-to-face confrontation: effects of closed-circuit technology on children's eyewitness testimony and jurors' decisions.
Goodman GS; Tobey AE; Batterman-Faunce JM; Orcutt H; Thomas S; Shapiro C; Sachsenmaier T
Law Hum Behav; 1998 Apr; 22(2):165-203. PubMed ID: 9566121
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
17. Mock Jurors' Perceptions of Child Sexual Abuse Cases: Investigating the Role of Delayed Disclosure and Relationship to the Perpetrator.
Miller QC; Call AA; London K
J Interpers Violence; 2022 Dec; 37(23-24):NP23374-NP23396. PubMed ID: 35285346
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
18. Jurors' and Judges' Evaluation of Defendants with Autism and the Impact on Sentencing: A Systematic Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Reviews and Meta-analyses (PRISMA) Review of Autism Spectrum Disorder in the Courtroom.
Allely CS; Cooper P
J Law Med; 2017 Nov; 25(1):105-123. PubMed ID: 29978627
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
19. Where There's Smoke, There's Fire: the Effect of Truncated Testimony on Juror Decision-making.
Anderson L; Gross J; Sonne T; Zajac R; Hayne H
Behav Sci Law; 2016 Jan; 34(1):200-17. PubMed ID: 26879737
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
20. Mock jurors' awareness of age-related changes in memory and cognitive capacity.
Martschuk N; Sporer SL
Psychiatr Psychol Law; 2020; 27(3):441-464. PubMed ID: 33071551
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
[Next] [New Search]
