148 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 30056530)
1. A prospective and population-based inquiry on the use and acceptability of peer support for women newly diagnosed with breast cancer.
Legg M; Hyde MK; Occhipinti S; Youl PH; Dunn J; Chambers SK
Support Care Cancer; 2019 Feb; 27(2):677-685. PubMed ID: 30056530
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
2. The use and acceptability of a one-on-one peer support program for Australian women with early breast cancer.
Rankin N; Williams P; Davis C; Girgis A
Patient Educ Couns; 2004 May; 53(2):141-6. PubMed ID: 15140453
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
3. Senior peer counseling by telephone for psychosocial support after breast cancer surgery: effects at six months.
Crane-Okada R; Freeman E; Kiger H; Ross M; Elashoff D; Deacon L; Giuliano AE
Oncol Nurs Forum; 2012 Jan; 39(1):78-89. PubMed ID: 22201658
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
4. A randomized trial of dyadic peer support intervention for newly diagnosed breast cancer patients in Korea.
Lee R; Lee KS; Oh EG; Kim SH
Cancer Nurs; 2013; 36(3):E15-22. PubMed ID: 22964869
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
5. Emotional approach coping and the effects of online peer-led support group participation among patients with breast cancer: a longitudinal study.
Batenburg A; Das E
J Med Internet Res; 2014 Nov; 16(11):e256. PubMed ID: 25474819
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
6. Telephone peer support for women with gynaecological cancer: recipients' perspectives.
Pistrang N; Jay Z; Gessler S; Barker C
Psychooncology; 2012 Oct; 21(10):1082-90. PubMed ID: 21751294
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
7. Benefits of peer support in online Japanese breast cancer communities: differences between lurkers and posters.
Setoyama Y; Yamazaki Y; Namayama K
J Med Internet Res; 2011 Dec; 13(4):e122. PubMed ID: 22204869
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
8. Enablers and Barriers to Implementing ICU Follow-Up Clinics and Peer Support Groups Following Critical Illness: The Thrive Collaboratives.
Haines KJ; McPeake J; Hibbert E; Boehm LM; Aparanji K; Bakhru RN; Bastin AJ; Beesley SJ; Beveridge L; Butcher BW; Drumright K; Eaton TL; Farley T; Firshman P; Fritschle A; Holdsworth C; Hope AA; Johnson A; Kenes MT; Khan BA; Kloos JA; Kross EK; Mactavish P; Meyer J; Montgomery-Yates A; Quasim T; Saft HL; Slack A; Stollings J; Weinhouse G; Whitten J; Netzer G; Hopkins RO; Mikkelsen ME; Iwashyna TJ; Sevin CM
Crit Care Med; 2019 Sep; 47(9):1194-1200. PubMed ID: 31241499
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
9. Effectiveness of peer support on health-related quality of life in recently diagnosed breast cancer patients: a randomized controlled trial.
Toija AS; Kettunen TH; Leidenius MHK; Vainiola THK; Roine RPA
Support Care Cancer; 2019 Jan; 27(1):123-130. PubMed ID: 30338354
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
10. What models of peer support do people with colorectal cancer prefer?
Ieropoli SC; White VM; Jefford M; Akkerman D
Eur J Cancer Care (Engl); 2011 Jul; 20(4):455-65. PubMed ID: 20738390
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
11. Cognitive and affective determinants of decisions to attend a group psychosocial support program for women with breast cancer.
Cameron LD; Booth RJ; Schlatter M; Ziginskas D; Harman JE; Benson SR
Psychosom Med; 2005; 67(4):584-9. PubMed ID: 16046371
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
12. What is the role of online support from the perspective of facilitators of face-to-face support groups? A multi-method study of the use of breast cancer online communities.
Bender JL; Katz J; Ferris LE; Jadad AR
Patient Educ Couns; 2013 Dec; 93(3):472-9. PubMed ID: 23928354
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
13. Effects of mutual dyad support on quality of life in women with breast cancer.
Sutton LB; Erlen JA
Cancer Nurs; 2006; 29(6):488-98. PubMed ID: 17135823
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
14. Facilitated peer support in breast cancer: a pre- and post-program evaluation of women's expectations and experiences of a facilitated peer support program.
Power S; Hegarty J
Cancer Nurs; 2010; 33(2):E9-16. PubMed ID: 20142745
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
15. Effects of online support group format (moderated vs peer-led) on depressive symptoms and extent of participation in women with breast cancer.
Klemm P
Comput Inform Nurs; 2012 Jan; 30(1):9-18. PubMed ID: 22240564
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
16. Perceived helpfulness and impact of social support provided by family, friends, and health care providers to women newly diagnosed with breast cancer.
Arora NK; Finney Rutten LJ; Gustafson DH; Moser R; Hawkins RP
Psychooncology; 2007 May; 16(5):474-86. PubMed ID: 16986172
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
17. A randomized, controlled study of Internet peer-to-peer interactions among women newly diagnosed with breast cancer.
Salzer MS; Palmer SC; Kaplan K; Brusilovskiy E; Ten Have T; Hampshire M; Metz J; Coyne JC
Psychooncology; 2010 Apr; 19(4):441-6. PubMed ID: 19484712
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
18. Education and psychological support meet the supportive care needs of Taiwanese women three months after surgery for newly diagnosed breast cancer: a non-randomised quasi-experimental study.
Liao MN; Chen SC; Lin YC; Chen MF; Wang CH; Jane SW
Int J Nurs Stud; 2014 Mar; 51(3):390-9. PubMed ID: 23942373
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
19. Amazon heart: an exploration of the role of challenge events in personal growth after breast cancer.
Dunn J; Campbell M; Penn D; Dwyer M; Chambers SK
J Psychosoc Oncol; 2009; 27(1):119-35. PubMed ID: 19197681
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
20. Using social support to promote breast self-examination performance.
Lierman LM; Young HM; Powell-Cope G; Georgiadou F; Benoliel JQ
Oncol Nurs Forum; 1994 Jul; 21(6):1051-6; discussion 1057. PubMed ID: 7971411
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
[Next] [New Search]
