These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

104 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 30056688)

  • 1. The influence of a first-order antedependence model and hyperparameters in BayesCπ for genomic prediction.
    Li X; Liu X; Chen Y
    Asian-Australas J Anim Sci; 2018 Dec; 31(12):1863-1870. PubMed ID: 30056688
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. A Bayesian antedependence model for whole genome prediction.
    Yang W; Tempelman RJ
    Genetics; 2012 Apr; 190(4):1491-501. PubMed ID: 22135352
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. Extension of the bayesian alphabet for genomic selection.
    Habier D; Fernando RL; Kizilkaya K; Garrick DJ
    BMC Bioinformatics; 2011 May; 12():186. PubMed ID: 21605355
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. Genomic breeding value prediction and QTL mapping of QTLMAS2010 data using Bayesian Methods.
    Sun X; Habier D; Fernando RL; Garrick DJ; Dekkers JC
    BMC Proc; 2011 May; 5 Suppl 3(Suppl 3):S13. PubMed ID: 21624169
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. Bayesian methods for jointly estimating genomic breeding values of one continuous and one threshold trait.
    Wang C; Li X; Qian R; Su G; Zhang Q; Ding X
    PLoS One; 2017; 12(4):e0175448. PubMed ID: 28410429
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. Improving the computational efficiency of fully Bayes inference and assessing the effect of misspecification of hyperparameters in whole-genome prediction models.
    Yang W; Chen C; Tempelman RJ
    Genet Sel Evol; 2015 Mar; 47(1):13. PubMed ID: 25885894
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. Fast genomic prediction of breeding values using parallel Markov chain Monte Carlo with convergence diagnosis.
    Guo P; Zhu B; Niu H; Wang Z; Liang Y; Chen Y; Zhang L; Ni H; Guo Y; Hay EHA; Gao X; Gao H; Wu X; Xu L; Li J
    BMC Bioinformatics; 2018 Jan; 19(1):3. PubMed ID: 29298666
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. The Impact of Variable Degrees of Freedom and Scale Parameters in Bayesian Methods for Genomic Prediction in Chinese Simmental Beef Cattle.
    Zhu B; Zhu M; Jiang J; Niu H; Wang Y; Wu Y; Xu L; Chen Y; Zhang L; Gao X; Gao H; Liu J; Li J
    PLoS One; 2016; 11(5):e0154118. PubMed ID: 27139889
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. Accuracies of genomic prediction for twenty economically important traits in Chinese Simmental beef cattle.
    Zhu B; Guo P; Wang Z; Zhang W; Chen Y; Zhang L; Gao H; Wang Z; Gao X; Xu L; Li J
    Anim Genet; 2019 Dec; 50(6):634-643. PubMed ID: 31502261
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. Comparison of five methods for genomic breeding value estimation for the common dataset of the 15th QTL-MAS Workshop.
    Wang CL; Ma PP; Zhang Z; Ding XD; Liu JF; Fu WX; Weng ZQ; Zhang Q
    BMC Proc; 2012 May; 6 Suppl 2(Suppl 2):S13. PubMed ID: 22640547
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. Genomic breeding value prediction and QTL mapping of QTLMAS2011 data using Bayesian and GBLUP methods.
    Zeng J; Pszczola M; Wolc A; Strabel T; Fernando RL; Garrick DJ; Dekkers JC
    BMC Proc; 2012 May; 6 Suppl 2(Suppl 2):S7. PubMed ID: 22640755
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. Improving accuracy of genomic prediction by genetic architecture based priors in a Bayesian model.
    Gao N; Li J; He J; Xiao G; Luo Y; Zhang H; Chen Z; Zhang Z
    BMC Genet; 2015 Oct; 16():120. PubMed ID: 26466667
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. Improving the accuracy of genomic prediction in dairy cattle using the biologically annotated neural networks framework.
    Wang X; Shi S; Ali Khan MY; Zhang Z; Zhang Y
    J Anim Sci Biotechnol; 2024 Jul; 15(1):87. PubMed ID: 38945998
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. Sensitivity to prior specification in Bayesian genome-based prediction models.
    Lehermeier C; Wimmer V; Albrecht T; Auinger HJ; Gianola D; Schmid VJ; Schön CC
    Stat Appl Genet Mol Biol; 2013 Jun; 12(3):375-91. PubMed ID: 23629460
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. Genomic predictions combining SNP markers and copy number variations in Nellore cattle.
    Hay EHA; Utsunomiya YT; Xu L; Zhou Y; Neves HHR; Carvalheiro R; Bickhart DM; Ma L; Garcia JF; Liu GE
    BMC Genomics; 2018 Jun; 19(1):441. PubMed ID: 29871610
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. Single-Trait and Multiple-Trait Genomic Prediction From Multi-Class Bayesian Alphabet Models Using Biological Information.
    Wang Z; Cheng H
    Front Genet; 2021; 12():717457. PubMed ID: 34707638
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. Comparison of alternative approaches to single-trait genomic prediction using genotyped and non-genotyped Hanwoo beef cattle.
    Lee J; Cheng H; Garrick D; Golden B; Dekkers J; Park K; Lee D; Fernando R
    Genet Sel Evol; 2017 Jan; 49(1):2. PubMed ID: 28093065
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. Factors affecting GEBV accuracy with single-step Bayesian models.
    Zhou L; Mrode R; Zhang S; Zhang Q; Li B; Liu JF
    Heredity (Edinb); 2018 Jan; 120(2):100-109. PubMed ID: 29167557
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. Prediction of genomic breeding values using new computing strategies for the implementation of MixP.
    Dong L; Fang M; Wang Z
    Sci Rep; 2017 Dec; 7(1):17200. PubMed ID: 29222415
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. High density marker panels, SNPs prioritizing and accuracy of genomic selection.
    Chang LY; Toghiani S; Ling A; Aggrey SE; Rekaya R
    BMC Genet; 2018 Jan; 19(1):4. PubMed ID: 29304753
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 6.