These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

108 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 30056688)

  • 41. Genomic prediction applied to high-biomass sorghum for bioenergy production.
    de Oliveira AA; Pastina MM; de Souza VF; da Costa Parrella RA; Noda RW; Simeone MLF; Schaffert RE; de Magalhães JV; Damasceno CMB; Margarido GRA
    Mol Breed; 2018; 38(4):49. PubMed ID: 29670457
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 42. Prediction of genomic breeding values for reproductive traits in Nellore heifers.
    Costa RB; Irano N; Diaz IDPS; Takada L; Hermisdorff IDC; Carvalheiro R; Baldi F; de Oliveira HN; Tonhati H; de Albuquerque LG
    Theriogenology; 2019 Feb; 125():12-17. PubMed ID: 30368127
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 43. Prediction of genetic contributions to complex traits using whole genome sequencing data.
    Yao C; Leng N; Weigel KA; Lee KE; Engelman CD; Meyers KJ
    BMC Proc; 2014; 8(Suppl 1):S68. PubMed ID: 25519339
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 44. Genome-Enabled Prediction of Breeding Values for Feedlot Average Daily Weight Gain in Nelore Cattle.
    Somavilla AL; Regitano LCA; Rosa GJM; Mokry FB; Mudadu MA; Tizioto PC; Oliveira PSN; Souza MM; Coutinho LL; Munari DP
    G3 (Bethesda); 2017 Jun; 7(6):1855-1859. PubMed ID: 28391242
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 45. Ridge, Lasso and Bayesian additive-dominance genomic models.
    Azevedo CF; de Resende MD; E Silva FF; Viana JM; Valente MS; Resende MF; Muñoz P
    BMC Genet; 2015 Aug; 16():105. PubMed ID: 26303864
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 46. Impact of QTL minor allele frequency on genomic evaluation using real genotype data and simulated phenotypes in Japanese Black cattle.
    Uemoto Y; Sasaki S; Kojima T; Sugimoto Y; Watanabe T
    BMC Genet; 2015 Nov; 16():134. PubMed ID: 26586567
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 47. Effects of marker density and population structure on the genomic prediction accuracy for growth trait in Pacific white shrimp Litopenaeus vannamei.
    Wang Q; Yu Y; Yuan J; Zhang X; Huang H; Li F; Xiang J
    BMC Genet; 2017 May; 18(1):45. PubMed ID: 28514941
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 48. Genomic evaluation of feed efficiency component traits in Duroc pigs using 80K, 650K and whole-genome sequence variants.
    Zhang C; Kemp RA; Stothard P; Wang Z; Boddicker N; Krivushin K; Dekkers J; Plastow G
    Genet Sel Evol; 2018 Apr; 50(1):14. PubMed ID: 29625549
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 49. Comparison of breeding value prediction for two traits in a Nellore-Angus crossbred population using different Bayesian modeling methodologies.
    Hulsman Hanna LL; Garrick DJ; Gill CA; Herring AD; Sanders JO; Riley DG
    Genet Mol Biol; 2014 Oct; 37(4):631-7. PubMed ID: 25505837
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 50. Incorporating Prior Knowledge of Principal Components in Genomic Prediction.
    Hosseini-Vardanjani SM; Shariati MM; Moradi Shahrebabak H; Tahmoorespur M
    Front Genet; 2018; 9():289. PubMed ID: 30116258
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 51. Accuracies of genomic prediction of feed efficiency traits using different prediction and validation methods in an experimental Nelore cattle population.
    Silva RM; Fragomeni BO; Lourenco DA; Magalhães AF; Irano N; Carvalheiro R; Canesin RC; Mercadante ME; Boligon AA; Baldi FS; Misztal I; Albuquerque LG
    J Anim Sci; 2016 Sep; 94(9):3613-3623. PubMed ID: 27898889
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 52. Accuracy of prediction of simulated polygenic phenotypes and their underlying quantitative trait loci genotypes using real or imputed whole-genome markers in cattle.
    Hassani S; Saatchi M; Fernando RL; Garrick DJ
    Genet Sel Evol; 2015 Dec; 47():99. PubMed ID: 26698091
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 53. Genomic prediction using imputed whole-genome sequence data in Holstein Friesian cattle.
    van Binsbergen R; Calus MP; Bink MC; van Eeuwijk FA; Schrooten C; Veerkamp RF
    Genet Sel Evol; 2015 Sep; 47(1):71. PubMed ID: 26381777
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 54. Identification of potential genomic regions for egg weight by a haplotype-based genome-wide association study using Bayesian methods.
    Khaltabadi Farahani AH; Mohammadi H; Moradi MH; Ghasemi HA
    Br Poult Sci; 2020 Jun; 61(3):251-257. PubMed ID: 32008362
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 55. An efficient unified model for genome-wide association studies and genomic selection.
    Li H; Su G; Jiang L; Bao Z
    Genet Sel Evol; 2017 Aug; 49(1):64. PubMed ID: 28836943
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 56. Accuracy of whole-genome prediction using a genetic architecture-enhanced variance-covariance matrix.
    Zhang Z; Erbe M; He J; Ober U; Gao N; Zhang H; Simianer H; Li J
    G3 (Bethesda); 2015 Feb; 5(4):615-27. PubMed ID: 25670771
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 57. Pre-selecting markers based on fixation index scores improved the power of genomic evaluations in a combined Yorkshire pig population.
    Ye S; Song H; Ding X; Zhang Z; Li J
    Animal; 2020; 14(8):1555-1564. PubMed ID: 32209149
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 58. Variable selection models for genomic selection using whole-genome sequence data and singular value decomposition.
    Meuwissen THE; Indahl UG; Ødegård J
    Genet Sel Evol; 2017 Dec; 49(1):94. PubMed ID: 29281962
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 59. Predictive ability of genome-assisted statistical models under various forms of gene action.
    Momen M; Mehrgardi AA; Sheikhi A; Kranis A; Tusell L; Morota G; Rosa GJM; Gianola D
    Sci Rep; 2018 Aug; 8(1):12309. PubMed ID: 30120288
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 60. Design of a low-density SNP chip for the main Australian sheep breeds and its effect on imputation and genomic prediction accuracy.
    Bolormaa S; Gore K; van der Werf JH; Hayes BJ; Daetwyler HD
    Anim Genet; 2015 Oct; 46(5):544-56. PubMed ID: 26360638
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Previous]   [Next]    [New Search]
    of 6.