These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

277 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 30057131)

  • 1. How Are Gleason Scores Categorized in the Current Literature: An Analysis and Comparison of Articles Published in 2016-2017.
    Zhou AG; Salles DC; Samarska IV; Epstein JI
    Eur Urol; 2019 Jan; 75(1):25-31. PubMed ID: 30057131
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. Comparison of Japanese general rules of prostatic cancer and Gleason grading system.
    Fukagai T; Namiki T; Carlile RG; Sugawara S; Morita M; Shimada M; Yoshida H; Namiki H
    Int J Urol; 2001 Oct; 8(10):539-45; discussion 546-8. PubMed ID: 11737480
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. From Gleason to International Society of Urological Pathology (ISUP) grading of prostate cancer.
    Samaratunga H; Delahunt B; Yaxley J; Srigley JR; Egevad L
    Scand J Urol; 2016 Oct; 50(5):325-9. PubMed ID: 27415753
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. Contemporary Gleason Grading of Prostatic Carcinoma: An Update With Discussion on Practical Issues to Implement the 2014 International Society of Urological Pathology (ISUP) Consensus Conference on Gleason Grading of Prostatic Carcinoma.
    Epstein JI; Amin MB; Reuter VE; Humphrey PA
    Am J Surg Pathol; 2017 Apr; 41(4):e1-e7. PubMed ID: 28177964
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. New Prostate Cancer Grading System Predicts Long-term Survival Following Surgery for Gleason Score 8-10 Prostate Cancer.
    Ham WS; Chalfin HJ; Feng Z; Trock BJ; Epstein JI; Cheung C; Humphreys E; Partin AW; Han M
    Eur Urol; 2017 Jun; 71(6):907-912. PubMed ID: 27876305
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. Outcomes of Gleason score 3 + 4 = 7 prostate cancer with minimal amounts (<6%) vs ≥6% of Gleason pattern 4 tissue in needle biopsy specimens.
    Kır G; Seneldir H; Gumus E
    Ann Diagn Pathol; 2016 Feb; 20():48-51. PubMed ID: 26750655
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. Gleason grading challenges in the diagnosis of prostate adenocarcinoma: experience of a single institution.
    Chen SD; Fava JL; Amin A
    Virchows Arch; 2016 Feb; 468(2):213-8. PubMed ID: 26563400
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. The 2014 International Society of Urological Pathology (ISUP) Consensus Conference on Gleason Grading of Prostatic Carcinoma: Definition of Grading Patterns and Proposal for a New Grading System.
    Epstein JI; Egevad L; Amin MB; Delahunt B; Srigley JR; Humphrey PA;
    Am J Surg Pathol; 2016 Feb; 40(2):244-52. PubMed ID: 26492179
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. Review of Bioptic Gleason Scores by Central Pathologist Modifies the Risk Classification in Prostate Cancer.
    Soga N; Yatabe Y; Kageyama T; Ogura Y; Hayashi N
    Urol Int; 2015; 95(4):452-6. PubMed ID: 26430904
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. [Impact of International Association of Urological Pathology Gleason scoring system on prostatic carcinoma grading: a preliminary analysis of 185 cases].
    Wang G; Shen D
    Zhonghua Bing Li Xue Za Zhi; 2014 Oct; 43(10):677-9. PubMed ID: 25567594
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. Prognostic Significance of Percentage and Architectural Types of Contemporary Gleason Pattern 4 Prostate Cancer in Radical Prostatectomy.
    Choy B; Pearce SM; Anderson BB; Shalhav AL; Zagaja G; Eggener SE; Paner GP
    Am J Surg Pathol; 2016 Oct; 40(10):1400-6. PubMed ID: 27379821
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. Prostate biopsy and radical prostatectomy Gleason score correlation in heterogenous tumors: proposal for a composite Gleason score.
    Arias-Stella JA; Shah AB; Montoya-Cerrillo D; Williamson SR; Gupta NS
    Am J Surg Pathol; 2015 Sep; 39(9):1213-8. PubMed ID: 26274028
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. Correlation of Preoperative and Radical Prostatectomy Gleason Score: Examining the Predictors of Upgrade and Downgrade Results.
    Pourmand G; Gooran S; Hossieni SR; Guitynavard F; Safavi M; Sharifi A; Mokhtari E
    Acta Med Iran; 2017 Apr; 55(4):249-253. PubMed ID: 28532136
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. Metastatic potential to regional lymph nodes with Gleason score ≤7, including tertiary pattern 5, at radical prostatectomy.
    Diolombi ML; Epstein JI
    BJU Int; 2017 Jun; 119(6):872-878. PubMed ID: 27496532
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. Agreement of Gleason score on prostate biopsy and radical prostatectomy specimen: is there improvement with increased number of biopsy cylinders and the 2005 revised Gleason scoring?
    Van Praet C; Libbrecht L; D'Hondt F; Decaestecker K; Fonteyne V; Verschuere S; Rottey S; Praet M; De Visschere P; Lumen N;
    Clin Genitourin Cancer; 2014 Jun; 12(3):160-6. PubMed ID: 24361055
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. Downgrading of biopsy based Gleason score in prostatectomy specimens.
    Treurniet KM; Trudel D; Sykes J; Evans AJ; Finelli A; Van der Kwast TH
    J Clin Pathol; 2014 Apr; 67(4):313-8. PubMed ID: 24403214
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. Prostate cancer grading: the effect of stratification of needle biopsy Gleason Score 4 + 3 as high or intermediate grade.
    Fanning DM; Kay E; Fan Y; Fitzpatrick JM; Watson RW
    BJU Int; 2010 Mar; 105(5):631-5. PubMed ID: 19732053
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. Gleason score 3 + 4=7 prostate cancer with minimal quantity of gleason pattern 4 on needle biopsy is associated with low-risk tumor in radical prostatectomy specimen.
    Huang CC; Kong MX; Zhou M; Rosenkrantz AB; Taneja SS; Melamed J; Deng FM
    Am J Surg Pathol; 2014 Aug; 38(8):1096-101. PubMed ID: 24832163
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. The New Prostate Cancer Grading System Does Not Improve Prediction of Clinical Recurrence After Radical Prostatectomy: Results of a Large, Two-Center Validation Study.
    Dell'Oglio P; Karnes RJ; Gandaglia G; Fossati N; Stabile A; Moschini M; Cucchiara V; Zaffuto E; Karakiewicz PI; Suardi N; Montorsi F; Briganti A
    Prostate; 2017 Feb; 77(3):263-273. PubMed ID: 27753114
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. Extended prostate biopsy scheme improves reliability of Gleason grading: implications for radiotherapy patients.
    King CR; McNeal JE; Gill H; Presti JC
    Int J Radiat Oncol Biol Phys; 2004 Jun; 59(2):386-91. PubMed ID: 15145152
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 14.